Paper · 2014 · International Journal of Agriculture Environment and Biotechnology

Fibrous Root Distribution in Blood Red Sweet Orange Trees under Semi- arid Irrigated Ecosystem

Raj Pal Singh Dalal; Harsimrat K. Bons; Satpal Baloda

11
claims
23
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Fibrous root distribution pattern of mature trees of sweet orange cultivar Blood Red budded on rough lemon with her cleoptera and troyer citrange rootstocks were studied by root excavation method. The roots excavated from four radial distances i.e.0–75,75–150, 150–225 and 225–300 cm from the tree trunk and three depths i.e.0–15, 15–30 and 30–60 cm from the ground level indicated that fibrous root dry weight density and proportion of dry weight differed significantly at various depths and radial distances. Cleoptera has more feeder roots as compared to rough lemon and troyer. Feeder root dry weight density and dry weight proportion was almost the same between 0–15 & 15–30 cm depth and at deeper horizon there was significant decrease in all the root stocks. Approximately 70% of the total feeder roots in all rootstocks were within 0–30 cm depth i.e. intensive vertical development. The highest feeder root dry weight density was recorded at 0-75cm radial distance after that there was a sharp decrease. Troyer citrange, cleoptera and rough lemon contain about 65, 61 and 50% feeder roots up to 150 cm radial distance from the trunk. Hence, feeder roots, in troyer citrange and cleoptera may be exemplified as intensive lateral development. Rough lemon bears extensive lateral development as it has substantial amount of feeder roots at 150-225cm radial distance.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Feeder-root density and dry-weight proportion differed significantly by depth and radial distance.

Taxon
Sweet OrangeCitrus sinensist0
Outcome
fibrous root dry weight density and proportion of dry weighte0
Setting
various depths and radial distancese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sweet Orange Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–57 · show in text ↑
e0

“fibrous root dry weight density and proportion of dry weight differed significantly at various depths and radial distances”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 387–509 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cleoptera had more feeder roots than rough lemon and troyer.

Taxon
Sweet OrangeCitrus sinensist0
Material
Cleopterae0
Outcome
feeder rootse0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
rough lemon and troyere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sweet Orange Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–57 · show in text ↑
e0

“Cleoptera has more feeder roots as compared to rough lemon and troyer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 511–581 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Feeder-root dry-weight density and proportion were nearly equal at 0–15 and 15–30 cm depths.

Taxon
Sweet OrangeCitrus sinensist0
Outcome
Feeder root dry weight density and dry weight proportione0
Direction
almost the samee0
Value
0–15 & 15–30 cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sweet Orange Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–57 · show in text ↑
e0

“Feeder root dry weight density and dry weight proportion was almost the same between 0–15 & 15–30 cm depth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 582–688 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Feeder-root density and proportion significantly decreased in the deeper horizon across rootstocks.

Taxon
Sweet OrangeCitrus sinensist0
Outcome
Feeder root dry weight density and dry weight proportione1
Direction
decreasee0
Setting
deeper horizone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sweet Orange Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–57 · show in text ↑
e0

“at deeper horizon there was significant decrease in all the root stocks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–764 · show in text ↑
e1

“Feeder root dry weight density and dry weight proportion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 582–638 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

About 70% of feeder roots across rootstocks occurred within 0–30 cm depth.

Taxon
Sweet OrangeCitrus sinensist0
Outcome
total feeder rootse0
Value
Approximately 70%e0
Setting
within 0–30 cm depthe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sweet Orange Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–57 · show in text ↑
e0

“Approximately 70% of the total feeder roots in all rootstocks were within 0–30 cm depth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–853 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Feeder-root dry-weight density was highest at 0-75cm radial distance and then decreased sharply.

Taxon
Sweet OrangeCitrus sinensist0
Outcome
feeder root dry weight densitye0
Direction
higheste0
Value
0-75cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sweet Orange Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–57 · show in text ↑
e0

“The highest feeder root dry weight density was recorded at 0-75cm radial distance after that there was a sharp decrease.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–1011 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Troyer citrange had about 65% of feeder roots within 150 cm of the trunk.

Taxon
Sweet OrangeCitrus sinensist0
Material
Troyer citrangee0
Outcome
feeder rootse0
Value
65e0
Setting
up to 150 cm radial distance from the trunke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sweet Orange Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–57 · show in text ↑
e0

“Troyer citrange, cleoptera and rough lemon contain about 65, 61 and 50% feeder roots up to 150 cm radial distance from the trunk.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1012–1141 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cleoptera had about 61% of feeder roots within 150 cm of the trunk.

Taxon
Sweet OrangeCitrus sinensist0
Material
cleopterae0
Outcome
feeder rootse0
Value
61e0
Setting
up to 150 cm radial distance from the trunke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sweet Orange Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–57 · show in text ↑
e0

“Troyer citrange, cleoptera and rough lemon contain about 65, 61 and 50% feeder roots up to 150 cm radial distance from the trunk.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1012–1141 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rough lemon had about 50% of feeder roots within 150 cm of the trunk.

Taxon
Sweet OrangeCitrus sinensist0
Material
rough lemone0
Outcome
feeder rootse0
Value
50%e0
Setting
up to 150 cm radial distance from the trunke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sweet Orange Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–57 · show in text ↑
e0

“Troyer citrange, cleoptera and rough lemon contain about 65, 61 and 50% feeder roots up to 150 cm radial distance from the trunk.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1012–1141 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Troyer citrange and cleoptera were characterized as having intensive lateral root development.

Taxon
Sweet OrangeCitrus sinensist0
Material
troyer citrange and cleopterae0
Outcome
intensive lateral developmente0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sweet Orange Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–57 · show in text ↑
e0

“feeder roots, in troyer citrange and cleoptera may be exemplified as intensive lateral development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1149–1247 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rough lemon was characterized as having extensive lateral development, with substantial feeder roots at 150-225cm.

Taxon
Sweet OrangeCitrus sinensist0
Material
Rough lemone0
Outcome
extensive lateral developmente0
Value
150-225cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sweet Orange Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–57 · show in text ↑
e0

“Rough lemon bears extensive lateral development as it has substantial amount of feeder roots at 150-225cm radial distance.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1249–1371 · show in text ↑