Paper · 1970 · Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Research

Efficacy Of Two Organic Amendments And A Nematicide To Manage Root-Knot Nematode (Meloidogyne Incognita) Of Tomato (Lycopersicon Esculentum L.)

MI Faruk; MI Rahman; MR Ali; et al.

17
claims
35
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted in two consecutive years to find out the efficacy of poultry refuse (PR), mustard oilcake (MOC), and Furadan 5G for the management of root-knot disease (Meloidogyne incognita) of tomato. Soil was treated with PR @ 3 and 5 t/ha, MOC @ 0.3 and 0.6 t/ha 3 weeks before transplanting and Furadan 5G @ 40 kg/ha on the day of transplanting of tomato seedlings. PR @ 3 t/ha and MOC @0.3 t/ha were applied alone and also mixed with Furadan 5G @ 20 kg/ha. The soils of the experimental plots were inoculated with chopped severely galled (M incognita) roots of tomato at the time of treatment application. In both the years, considerable reduction in rootknot disease and increase in plant growth and fruit yield were achieved with different treatments with two organic materials applied alone or mixed with Furadan 5G. The most effective treatment was PR @ 3 t/ha + Furadan 5G @ 20 kg/ha followed by PR alone @ 5 t/ha. Efficacy of PR @ 3 t/ha and MOC @ 0.6 1/ha were also appreciable. In first year and second year, gall index values were 6.50 and 6.27 under control, respectively. The severity was reduced to 2.27-4.00 in first year and 1.73-4.07 in second year due to application of the four treatments. On the other hand, fruit yield under control was 50.9 t/ha at first year and 47.6 t/ha in second year. The highly effective four treatments increased fruit yield to 71.1-82.5 t/ha in first year and 60.8-82.0 t/ha in second year. The fruit yield of tomato was directly and linearly correlated with gall indices in tomato gall. Based on findings of the study PR @ 3 t/ha + Furadan @20 kg/ha and PR alone @ 5 t/ha were noted as effective treatment to manage root-knot disease of tomato. Keywords: Poultry refuse; mustard oilcake; Furadan; Meloidogjyne incognita; tomato. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/bjar.v36i3.9275 BJAR 2011; 36(3): 477-486

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic amendments and Furadan 5G considerably reduced root-knot disease in tomato.

Treatment
two organic materials applied alone or mixed with Furadan 5Ge3
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae1pathogen
Outcome
rootknot diseasee3
Direction
reductione3
Setting
field experimente1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“A field experiment was conducted in two consecutive years to find out the efficacy of poultry refuse (PR), mustard oilcake (MOC), and Furadan 5G for the management of root-knot disease (Meloidogyne incognita) of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–218 · show in text ↑
e3

“In both the years, considerable reduction in rootknot disease and increase in plant growth and fruit yield were achieved with different treatments with two organic materials applied alone or mixed with Furadan 5G”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 629–841 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic amendments and Furadan 5G increased plant growth in tomato.

Treatment
two organic materials applied alone or mixed with Furadan 5Ge3
Outcome
plant growthe3
Direction
increasee3
Setting
field experimente1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“A field experiment was conducted in two consecutive years to find out the efficacy of poultry refuse (PR), mustard oilcake (MOC), and Furadan 5G for the management of root-knot disease (Meloidogyne incognita) of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–218 · show in text ↑
e3

“In both the years, considerable reduction in rootknot disease and increase in plant growth and fruit yield were achieved with different treatments with two organic materials applied alone or mixed with Furadan 5G”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 629–841 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic amendments and Furadan 5G increased fruit yield of tomato.

Treatment
two organic materials applied alone or mixed with Furadan 5Ge3
Outcome
fruit yielde3
Direction
increasee3
Setting
field experimente1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“A field experiment was conducted in two consecutive years to find out the efficacy of poultry refuse (PR), mustard oilcake (MOC), and Furadan 5G for the management of root-knot disease (Meloidogyne incognita) of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–218 · show in text ↑
e3

“In both the years, considerable reduction in rootknot disease and increase in plant growth and fruit yield were achieved with different treatments with two organic materials applied alone or mixed with Furadan 5G”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 629–841 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PR at 3 t/ha + Furadan 5G at 20 kg/ha was the most effective treatment against root-knot nematode in tomato, followed by PR alone at 5 t/ha.

Treatment
PR @ 3 t/ha + Furadan 5G @ 20 kg/hae4
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae1pathogen
Outcome
most effective treatmente4
Direction
most effectivee4
Comparator
PR alone @ 5 t/hae4
Setting
field experimente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“A field experiment was conducted in two consecutive years to find out the efficacy of poultry refuse (PR), mustard oilcake (MOC), and Furadan 5G for the management of root-knot disease (Meloidogyne incognita) of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–218 · show in text ↑
e4

“The most effective treatment was PR @ 3 t/ha + Furadan 5G @ 20 kg/ha followed by PR alone @ 5 t/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 843–941 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PR at 3 t/ha was appreciably effective against root-knot nematode in tomato.

Treatment
PR @ 3 t/hae5
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae1pathogen
Outcome
Efficacye5
Direction
appreciablee5
Setting
field experimente1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“A field experiment was conducted in two consecutive years to find out the efficacy of poultry refuse (PR), mustard oilcake (MOC), and Furadan 5G for the management of root-knot disease (Meloidogyne incognita) of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–218 · show in text ↑
e5

“Efficacy of PR @ 3 t/ha and MOC @ 0.6 1/ha were also appreciable”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 943–1007 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MOC at 0.6 1/ha was appreciably effective against root-knot nematode in tomato.

Treatment
MOC @ 0.6 1/hae5
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae1pathogen
Outcome
Efficacye5
Direction
appreciablee5
Setting
field experimente1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“A field experiment was conducted in two consecutive years to find out the efficacy of poultry refuse (PR), mustard oilcake (MOC), and Furadan 5G for the management of root-knot disease (Meloidogyne incognita) of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–218 · show in text ↑
e5

“Efficacy of PR @ 3 t/ha and MOC @ 0.6 1/ha were also appreciable”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 943–1007 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gall index under control was 6.50 in the first year.

Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae1pathogen
Outcome
gall index valuese2
Value
6.50e2
Qualifier
first yeare2
Comparator
controle2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“A field experiment was conducted in two consecutive years to find out the efficacy of poultry refuse (PR), mustard oilcake (MOC), and Furadan 5G for the management of root-knot disease (Meloidogyne incognita) of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–218 · show in text ↑
e2

“In first year and second year, gall index values were 6.50 and 6.27 under control, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1009–1104 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gall index under control was 6.27 in the second year.

Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae1pathogen
Outcome
gall index valuese2
Value
6.27e2
Qualifier
second yeare2
Comparator
controle2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“A field experiment was conducted in two consecutive years to find out the efficacy of poultry refuse (PR), mustard oilcake (MOC), and Furadan 5G for the management of root-knot disease (Meloidogyne incognita) of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–218 · show in text ↑
e2

“In first year and second year, gall index values were 6.50 and 6.27 under control, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1009–1104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Severity was reduced to 2.27-4.00 in the first year by the four treatments compared with control.

Treatment
application of the four treatmentse6
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae1pathogen
Outcome
severitye6
Direction
reducede6
Value
2.27-4.00e6
Qualifier
first yeare6
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“A field experiment was conducted in two consecutive years to find out the efficacy of poultry refuse (PR), mustard oilcake (MOC), and Furadan 5G for the management of root-knot disease (Meloidogyne incognita) of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–218 · show in text ↑
e2

“In first year and second year, gall index values were 6.50 and 6.27 under control, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1009–1104 · show in text ↑
e6

“The severity was reduced to 2.27-4.00 in first year and 1.73-4.07 in second year due to application of the four treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1228 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Severity was reduced to 1.73-4.07 in the second year by the four treatments compared with control.

Treatment
application of the four treatmentse6
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae1pathogen
Outcome
severitye6
Direction
reducede6
Value
1.73-4.07e6
Qualifier
second yeare6
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“A field experiment was conducted in two consecutive years to find out the efficacy of poultry refuse (PR), mustard oilcake (MOC), and Furadan 5G for the management of root-knot disease (Meloidogyne incognita) of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–218 · show in text ↑
e2

“In first year and second year, gall index values were 6.50 and 6.27 under control, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1009–1104 · show in text ↑
e6

“The severity was reduced to 2.27-4.00 in first year and 1.73-4.07 in second year due to application of the four treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1228 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit yield under control was 50.9 t/ha in the first year.

Outcome
fruit yielde7
Value
50.9 t/hae7
Qualifier
first yeare7

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“A field experiment was conducted in two consecutive years to find out the efficacy of poultry refuse (PR), mustard oilcake (MOC), and Furadan 5G for the management of root-knot disease (Meloidogyne incognita) of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–218 · show in text ↑
e7

“On the other hand, fruit yield under control was 50.9 t/ha at first year and 47.6 t/ha in second year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1230–1331 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit yield under control was 47.6 t/ha in the second year.

Outcome
fruit yielde7
Value
47.6 t/hae7
Qualifier
second yeare7

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“A field experiment was conducted in two consecutive years to find out the efficacy of poultry refuse (PR), mustard oilcake (MOC), and Furadan 5G for the management of root-knot disease (Meloidogyne incognita) of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–218 · show in text ↑
e7

“On the other hand, fruit yield under control was 50.9 t/ha at first year and 47.6 t/ha in second year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1230–1331 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The four treatments increased fruit yield to 71.1-82.5 t/ha in the first year.

Treatment
four treatmentse2
Outcome
fruit yielde2
Direction
increasede2
Value
71.1-82.5 t/hae2
Qualifier
first yeare2
Comparator
controle7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“A field experiment was conducted in two consecutive years to find out the efficacy of poultry refuse (PR), mustard oilcake (MOC), and Furadan 5G for the management of root-knot disease (Meloidogyne incognita) of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–218 · show in text ↑
e7

“On the other hand, fruit yield under control was 50.9 t/ha at first year and 47.6 t/ha in second year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1230–1331 · show in text ↑
e2

“The highly effective four treatments increased fruit yield to 71.1-82.5 t/ha in first year and 60.8-82.0 t/ha in second year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1333–1457 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The four treatments increased fruit yield to 60.8-82.0 t/ha in the second year.

Treatment
four treatmentse2
Outcome
fruit yielde2
Direction
increasede2
Value
60.8-82.0 t/hae2
Qualifier
second yeare2
Comparator
controle7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“A field experiment was conducted in two consecutive years to find out the efficacy of poultry refuse (PR), mustard oilcake (MOC), and Furadan 5G for the management of root-knot disease (Meloidogyne incognita) of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–218 · show in text ↑
e7

“On the other hand, fruit yield under control was 50.9 t/ha at first year and 47.6 t/ha in second year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1230–1331 · show in text ↑
e2

“The highly effective four treatments increased fruit yield to 71.1-82.5 t/ha in first year and 60.8-82.0 t/ha in second year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1333–1457 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit yield of tomato was directly and linearly correlated with gall indices.

Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
directly and linearly correlatede0
Comparator
gall indicese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fruit yield of tomato was directly and linearly correlated with gall indices in tomato gall”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1459–1554 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

PR at 3 t/ha + Furadan @20 kg/ha is an effective treatment to manage root-knot disease of tomato.

Treatment
PR @ 3 t/ha + Furadan @20 kg/hae0
Outcome
effective treatment to manage root-knot diseasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Based on findings of the study PR @ 3 t/ha + Furadan @20 kg/ha and PR alone @ 5 t/ha were noted as effective treatment to manage root-knot disease of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1556–1712 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

PR alone at 5 t/ha is an effective treatment to manage root-knot disease of tomato.

Treatment
PR alone @ 5 t/hae0
Outcome
effective treatment to manage root-knot diseasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Based on findings of the study PR @ 3 t/ha + Furadan @20 kg/ha and PR alone @ 5 t/ha were noted as effective treatment to manage root-knot disease of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1556–1712 · show in text ↑

carbofuran · Meloidogyne incognita · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 20 positive, 1 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

carbofuran · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

carbofuran · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.