Paper · 2006 · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Forage quality and tannin concentration and composition of a collection of the tropical shrub legume Flemingia macrophylla

Meike S Andersson; Carlos E Lascano; Rainer Schultze‐Kraft; et al.

11
claims
11
verbatim quotes
16
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract A collection of 23 Flemingia macrophylla (Willd.) Merrill accessions of different growth habits and contrasting digestibility and one Flemingia stricta reference accession were assessed for forage quality with particular emphasis on digestibility, condensed tannin concentration and fiber content. Large differences in in vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD) (356 to 598 g kg −1 ), content of crude protein (CP) (121 to 254 g kg −1 ) and extractable condensed tannins (CT) (0 to 268 g kg −1 ), protein‐binding capacity of extractable CT or astringency (1.7 to 7.9 protein‐binding entities) (PBE) and monomer composition of extractable CT were detected. IVDMD and extractable CT were negatively correlated and extractable CT was positively correlated with protein‐binding capacity. Prodelphinidin was positively and propelargonidin negatively correlated with protein‐binding capacity of extractable CT. The accessions CIAT 18438, CIAT 21083, CIAT 21090 and CIAT 22082 were superior to the most widely used accession CIAT 17403 in terms of forage quality and could be an option in production systems with acid infertile soils. In future evaluations, particular attention needs to be paid to chemical and structural features related to the composition of extractable CT and their effect on nitrogen utilization by ruminants. Copyright © 2006 Society of Chemical Industry

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Accessions varied in dry matter digestibility from 356 to 598 g kg −1.

Outcome
in vitro dry matter digestibilitye0
Value
356 to 598 g kg −1e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“in vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD) (356 to 598 g kg −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 328–391 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crude protein content varied from 121 to 254 g kg −1.

Outcome
content of crude proteine0
Value
121 to 254 g kg −1e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“content of crude protein (CP) (121 to 254 g kg −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–444 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Extractable condensed tannins varied from 0 to 268 g kg −1.

Outcome
extractable condensed tanninse0
Value
0 to 268 g kg −1e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“extractable condensed tannins (CT) (0 to 268 g kg −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 449–503 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tannin protein-binding capacity varied from 1.7 to 7.9 protein-binding entities.

Outcome
protein‐binding capacitye0
Value
1.7 to 7.9 protein‐binding entitiese0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“protein‐binding capacity of extractable CT or astringency (1.7 to 7.9 protein‐binding entities)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 505–600 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Monomer composition of extractable tannins differed among accessions.

Outcome
monomer composition of extractable CTe0
Direction
differencese0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Large differences in in vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD) (356 to 598 g kg −1 ), content of crude protein (CP) (121 to 254 g kg −1 ) and extractable condensed tannins (CT) (0 to 268 g kg −1 ), protein‐binding capacity of extractable CT or astringency (1.7 to 7.9 protein‐binding entities) (PBE) and monomer composition of extractable CT were detected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 307–662 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Digestibility and extractable condensed tannins were negatively correlated.

Compound
extractable CTe0
Outcome
IVDMDe0
Direction
negatively correlatede0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“IVDMD and extractable CT were negatively correlated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 664–715 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Extractable tannins and protein-binding capacity were positively correlated.

Compound
extractable CTe0
Outcome
protein‐binding capacitye0
Direction
positively correlatede0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“extractable CT was positively correlated with protein‐binding capacity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–790 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prodelphinidin was positively correlated with tannin protein-binding capacity.

Compound
Prodelphinidine0
Outcome
protein‐binding capacitye0
Direction
positivelye0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Prodelphinidin was positively and propelargonidin negatively correlated with protein‐binding capacity of extractable CT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–911 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Propelargonidin was negatively correlated with tannin protein-binding capacity.

Compound
propelargonidine0
Outcome
protein‐binding capacitye0
Direction
negatively correlatede0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Prodelphinidin was positively and propelargonidin negatively correlated with protein‐binding capacity of extractable CT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–911 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four CIAT accessions had better forage quality than CIAT 17403.

Material
CIAT 18438, CIAT 21083, CIAT 21090 and CIAT 22082e0
Outcome
forage qualitye0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
CIAT 17403e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The accessions CIAT 18438, CIAT 21083, CIAT 21090 and CIAT 22082 were superior to the most widely used accession CIAT 17403 in terms of forage quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–1063 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The four superior accessions could be used in acid infertile soil production systems.

Outcome
option in production systemse0
Setting
acid infertile soilse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“could be an option in production systems with acid infertile soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1134 · show in text ↑