Paper · 2005 · Journal of Dairy Science

Effect of Fibrolytic Enzymes on the Fermentation Characteristics, Aerobic Stability, and Digestibility of Bermudagrass Silage

D.B. Dean; A.T. Adesogan; N. Krueger; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
81
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine if the nutritive value and aerobic stability of bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon) silage could be improved by addition of proprietary, exogenous cellulase/hemicellulase enzyme preparations at ensiling. A 5-wk regrowth of Tifton 85 bermudagrass was conserved without treatment (control) or after treatment with exogenous fibrolytic enzymes including Promote NET (Pr), Biocellulase X-20 (X20), Biocellulase A-20 (A20), and Enzyme CT. The respective enzymes were applied at half the recommended rate, the recommended rate, or twice the recommended rate corresponding to 0.65, 1.3, and 2.6 g/kg of DM, 7.3, 14.5, and 29 mg/kg of DM, at 7.3, 14.4, and 29 mg/kg of DM, and 89, 178, and 356 mg/kg of DM, for Pr, X20, A20, and CT, respectively. The enzymes were sprayed on the bermudagrass at ensiling (not added at feeding as suggested by the manufacturers) to test the objectives of the study. Six 1-kg replicates of chopped (5 cm) forage were ensiled for 145 d in 2.8-L mini silos. Three silos per treatment were used for chemical analysis and 3 for aerobic stability monitoring. The silage juice was analyzed for organic acids, pH, water-soluble carbohydrates (WSC), ammonia-N, and soluble N. Freeze-dried samples were analyzed for crude protein (CP), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), and acid detergent fiber (ADF). In vitro digestibility of DM (IVDMD), NDF (IVNDFD), and ADF (IVADFD) were determined after digesting the silages in buffered rumen fluid for 6 or 48 h in 2 ANKOM(II) Daisy Incubators. Compared with the other silages, those treated with Pr had lower DM losses, and lower pH and ammonia-N concentration than control silages. Residual WSC concentration was greater in Pr- and CT-treated silages than in control silages and greater in Pr-treated silages than CT-treated silages. Compared with control silages, NDF concentration was lower in silages treated with Pr, X20, and CT, and ADF concentration was lower in silages treated with Pr, X20, and A20. Nevertheless, Pr-treated silages contained lower ADF and NDF concentrations than silages treated with the other enzymes. Enzyme-treated silages contained less acetic acid than control silages, and Pr-treated silages had the lowest concentrations of acetic acid. Aerobic stability was increased by enzyme treatment but microbial counts were not affected. The 6-h IVDMD was increased by treatment with Pr and A20, however only Pr increased the IVDMD and IVNDFD at 48 h. The 48-h IVADFD was also increased by treatment with Pr, CT, and A20. These results show that when applied at ensiling, certain fibrolytic enzymes (particularly Promote) can improve the digestibility, fermentation, and aerobic stability of bermudagrass silage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Promote NET reduced dry matter losses, pH, and ammonia nitrogen relative to control silage.

Taxon
bermudagrassCynodon dactylont0
Treatment
Pre0
Outcome
DM losses, and lower pH and ammonia-N concentratione0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
control silagese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cynodon dactylon
Cynodon dactylon · TaxonRobert Flogaus-Faust · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with the other silages, those treated with Pr had lower DM losses, and lower pH and ammonia-N concentration than control silages.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1532–1670 · show in text ↑
t0

“bermudagrass”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 106–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pr and CT silages retained more water soluble carbohydrate than controls, with Pr higher than CT.

Taxon
bermudagrassCynodon dactylont0
Treatment
Pr- and CT-treated silagese0
Outcome
Residual WSC concentratione0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
control silagese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cynodon dactylon
Cynodon dactylon · TaxonRobert Flogaus-Faust · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Residual WSC concentration was greater in Pr- and CT-treated silages than in control silages and greater in Pr-treated silages than CT-treated silages.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1671–1822 · show in text ↑
t0

“bermudagrass”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 106–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pr, X20 and CT reduced neutral detergent fiber concentration relative to controls.

Taxon
bermudagrassCynodon dactylont0
Treatment
Pr, X20, and CTe0
Outcome
NDF concentratione0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cynodon dactylon
Cynodon dactylon · TaxonRobert Flogaus-Faust · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NDF concentration was lower in silages treated with Pr, X20, and CT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1854–1921 · show in text ↑
t0

“bermudagrass”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 106–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pr, X20 and A20 reduced acid detergent fiber concentration relative to controls.

Taxon
bermudagrassCynodon dactylont0
Treatment
Pr, X20, and A20e0
Outcome
ADF concentratione0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cynodon dactylon
Cynodon dactylon · TaxonRobert Flogaus-Faust · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ADF concentration was lower in silages treated with Pr, X20, and A20.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1927–1996 · show in text ↑
t0

“bermudagrass”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 106–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pr silage had lower ADF and NDF than silage treated with other enzymes.

Taxon
bermudagrassCynodon dactylont0
Treatment
Pr-treated silagese0
Outcome
ADF and NDF concentrationse0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
silages treated with the other enzymese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cynodon dactylon
Cynodon dactylon · TaxonRobert Flogaus-Faust · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pr-treated silages contained lower ADF and NDF concentrations than silages treated with the other enzymes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2011–2117 · show in text ↑
t0

“bermudagrass”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 106–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Enzyme treated silages contained less acetic acid than controls; Pr had the lowest concentration.

Taxon
bermudagrassCynodon dactylont0
Treatment
Enzyme-treated silagese0
Outcome
acetic acide0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
control silagese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cynodon dactylon
Cynodon dactylon · TaxonRobert Flogaus-Faust · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Enzyme-treated silages contained less acetic acid than control silages, and Pr-treated silages had the lowest concentrations of acetic acid.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2118–2258 · show in text ↑
t0

“bermudagrass”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 106–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Enzyme treatment increased aerobic stability.

Taxon
bermudagrassCynodon dactylont0
Treatment
enzyme treatmente0
Outcome
Aerobic stabilitye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cynodon dactylon
Cynodon dactylon · TaxonRobert Flogaus-Faust · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Aerobic stability was increased by enzyme treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2259–2310 · show in text ↑
t0

“bermudagrass”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 106–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Enzyme treatment did not affect microbial counts.

Taxon
bermudagrassCynodon dactylont0
Outcome
microbial countse0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cynodon dactylon
Cynodon dactylon · TaxonRobert Flogaus-Faust · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“microbial counts were not affected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2315–2349 · show in text ↑
t0

“bermudagrass”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 106–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pr and A20 increased six hour in vitro dry matter digestibility.

Taxon
bermudagrassCynodon dactylont0
Treatment
Pr and A20e0
Outcome
6-h IVDMDe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cynodon dactylon
Cynodon dactylon · TaxonRobert Flogaus-Faust · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 6-h IVDMD was increased by treatment with Pr and A20”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2351–2407 · show in text ↑
t0

“bermudagrass”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 106–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Only Pr increased 48 hour IVDMD and IVNDFD.

Taxon
bermudagrassCynodon dactylont0
Treatment
Pre0
Outcome
IVDMD and IVNDFDe0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
48 he0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cynodon dactylon
Cynodon dactylon · TaxonRobert Flogaus-Faust · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“only Pr increased the IVDMD and IVNDFD at 48 h”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2417–2463 · show in text ↑
t0

“bermudagrass”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 106–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pr, CT and A20 increased 48 hour IVADFD.

Taxon
bermudagrassCynodon dactylont0
Treatment
Pr, CT, and A20e0
Outcome
48-h IVADFDe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cynodon dactylon
Cynodon dactylon · TaxonRobert Flogaus-Faust · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 48-h IVADFD was also increased by treatment with Pr, CT, and A20.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2465–2534 · show in text ↑
t0

“bermudagrass”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 106–118 · show in text ↑

tillage · quality: sugar starch · Cynodon dactylon (Bermuda grass)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.