Paper · 2014 · Plant Disease

First Report of Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. pisi as Causal Agent of Root and Crown Rot on Chickpea (Cicer arietinum) in Southern Italy

F. De Curtis; D. Palmieri; D. Vitullo; et al.

7
claims
11
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Epidemiological investigations in representative chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) fields in southern Italy (Larino, Campobasso, 41°50′45″ N, 14°55′28″ E) identified severe withering (25 to 51%) of plants during flowering. Diseased plants showed a reduced total root biomass associated with less vigorous and chlorotic foliage. Browning and necrosis of subcortical and xylematic tissues of the crown and main roots were observed in affected plants. Symptomatic root and stem portions from 50 plants were sampled, surface disinfected with a sodium hypochlorite water solution (2% v/v for 2 min), rinsed with sterile distilled water, and placed in petri dishes containing potato dextrose agar with streptomycin sulfate (200 mg/l) and incubated at 25°C for 10 days. The most frequent fungal colony isolated showed macro- and microscopic characters specific of the genus Fusarium (3), with falcate and three-septate macroconidia (24.0 to 43.8 μm long) and microconidia (6.8 to 10.4 μm long) with zero or one septa. The ribosomal DNA of the fungal isolate processed by PCR using the ITS1F/ITS4 primers (2) produced an amplicon of 545 bp (ENA, Accession No. HG423346). A BLAST search with the amplified sequence in the database of the International Mycological Association ( www.mycobank.org ) revealed 99% identity with F. oxysporum sequences. Additional molecular analysis using the specific primers Foc0-12/Foc0-12rf for F. oxysporum f.sp. ciceris (Foc) produced an amplicon only in the chickpea virulent strain Foc-7952, race 0 (1) used as control; furthermore, PCR amplification for the Pisatin Demetylase gene by using the specific primers PDAF2a and PDAR3a (4) yielded the expected amplicon only for the new isolate, whereas no amplification was obtained with the control strain Foc-7952. Pathogenicity assays were carried out to complete Koch's postulates. To this aim, horticultural peat was infested with a conidial suspension (1 × 10 4 conidia/g of soil) from the new fungal pathogen, dispensed in plastic pots, and sown with surface sterilized seeds of chickpea (cv. Real, ISEA, Italy). Uncontaminated peat was used as control. For both treatments, 3 replicates of 10 seeds were used and experiments repeated twice. The plastic pots were kept in a growth chamber (28°C; 70% RH; 15/9 h light/dark) where the first disease symptoms on plants appeared 20 days after sowing. At the end of the experiments, all plants inoculated with the new isolate showed a high disease severity (98%), whereas non-inoculated plants remained healthy. The seedlings from infested soil demonstrated the same symptoms previously observed in the field, and after re-isolation, the causal agent demonstrated the same morphological features of the isolate used for inoculation. Pathogenicity tests were performed on pea, faba bean, melon, and tomato by using three cultivars for each crop. The results demonstrated high virulence of the new isolate of F. oxysporum f.sp. pisi (Fop) on both chickpea and pea with seed germination reduction, rot on main and secondary roots and cotyledonary leaves, and root biomass reduction and foliage chlorosis. No symptoms were observed on other inoculated vegetal species. Collectively, data of our investigation allow us to affirm that this is the first report of Fop as a new pathogen of chickpea. This result has great economic importance since it enables specific monitoring and management plans for this new disease caused by Fop on chickpea, a key crop for human and animal nutrition. References: (1) M. M. Jiménez-Gasco and R. M. Jiménez-Díaz, Phytopathology 93:201, 2003. (2) I. Larena et al. J. Biotechnol. 75:187, 1999. (3) J. F. Leslie and B. A. Summerell. The Fusarium Laboratory Manual. Blackwell Publishing, Ames, IA, 2006. (4) N. A. Milani et al. Fungal Genet. Biol. 933:942, 2012.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Severe withering affected 25 to 51% of chickpea plants during flowering.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Organ / stage
floweringe0
Outcome
severe witheringe0
Value
25 to 51%e0
Setting
southern Italye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Epidemiological investigations in representative chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) fields in southern Italy (Larino, Campobasso, 41°50′45″ N, 14°55′28″ E) identified severe withering (25 to 51%) of plants during flowering.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–218 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Diseased chickpea plants had reduced root biomass and chlorotic foliage.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Outcome
reduced total root biomass associated with less vigorous and chlorotic foliagee0
Direction
reducede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Diseased plants showed a reduced total root biomass associated with less vigorous and chlorotic foliage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 219–323 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–113 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Affected chickpea plants showed crown and root tissue browning and necrosis.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Organ / stage
crown and main rootse0
Outcome
Browning and necrosise0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Browning and necrosis of subcortical and xylematic tissues of the crown and main roots were observed in affected plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 324–444 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All inoculated chickpea plants showed high disease severity of 98%, while controls remained healthy.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
inoculated with the new isolatee0
Interactor
Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. pisiFusarium oxysporum f. sp. pisit0pathogen
Outcome
disease severitye0
Direction
highe0
Value
98%e0
Comparator
non-inoculated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. pisi
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. pisi · Interactor · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At the end of the experiments, all plants inoculated with the new isolate showed a high disease severity (98%), whereas non-inoculated plants remained healthy.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2373–2532 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. pisi as Causal Agent of Root and Crown Rot on Chickpea (Cicer arietinum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–113 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The new isolate was highly virulent on chickpea, reducing germination and root biomass and causing rot and chlorosis.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Interactor
F. oxysporum f.sp. pisiFusarium oxysporum f. sp. pisie0pathogen
Outcome
seed germination reduction, rot on main and secondary roots and cotyledonary leaves, and root biomass reduction and foliage chlorosise0
Direction
reductione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. pisi
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. pisi · Interactor · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results demonstrated high virulence of the new isolate of F. oxysporum f.sp. pisi (Fop) on both chickpea and pea with seed germination reduction, rot on main and secondary roots and cotyledonary leaves, and root biomass reduction and foliage chlorosis.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2866–3122 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The new isolate was highly virulent on pea, reducing germination and root biomass and causing rot and chlorosis.

Interactor
F. oxysporum f.sp. pisiFusarium oxysporum f. sp. pisie0pathogen
Outcome
seed germination reduction, rot on main and secondary roots and cotyledonary leaves, and root biomass reduction and foliage chlorosise0
Direction
reductione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. pisi
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. pisi · Interactor · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results demonstrated high virulence of the new isolate of F. oxysporum f.sp. pisi (Fop) on both chickpea and pea with seed germination reduction, rot on main and secondary roots and cotyledonary leaves, and root biomass reduction and foliage chlorosis.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2866–3122 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Other inoculated plant species showed no symptoms.

Taxon
other inoculated vegetal speciese0
Interactor
Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. pisiFusarium oxysporum f. sp. pisit0pathogen
Outcome
No symptomse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. pisi
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. pisi · Interactor · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No symptoms were observed on other inoculated vegetal species.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3123–3185 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. pisi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–45 · show in text ↑