Lathyrus oleraceus 73,443 claims

species · family Fabaceae · green plant · NCBI Taxonomy ↗

Common name: pea — Also written in claims: pea · Pisum sativum · peas · Pisum sativum L · garden pea · pea plants — NCBI synonyms: Pisum sativum · Pisum sativum var. ponderosum

Listed here with its subspecies, varieties and cultivar groups: Lathyrus oleraceus var. arvensis (327 claims), Lathyrus oleraceus subsp. biflorus (114 claims), Lathyrus oleraceus subsp. oleraceus (58 claims), [Pisum sativum] subsp. abyssinicum (40 claims), [Pisum sativum] subsp. asiaticum (3 claims), [Pisum sativum] subsp. transcaucasicum (3 claims), [Pisum sativum] subsp. jomardii (1 claim)

1022 spellings

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceusRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root rot in pea intercropped with oat was mostly higher than in the pea monoculture.

Treatment
intercropped with oate0
Outcome
root rote0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
the pea monoculturee0

Verbatim

e0

“In contrast, root rot in pea intercropped with oat was mostly higher than in the pea monoculture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1497–1593

Title

Root rot suppression mechanisms in lentil promoted by organic intercropping

Myriam R. Fernandez; Lobna Abdellatif; Noe Waelchli; et al. Crop Science 2026. doi:10.1002/csc2.70238

Other claims from this paper (6)
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher root rot in pea intercropped with oat was attributed to the prevalence of similar species, including Fusarium pathogens, common to both crop species.

Interactor
FusariumFusariume0pathogen
Outcome
root rote0
Qualifier
prevalence of similar species, including Fusarium pathogens, common to both crop speciese0

Verbatim

e0

“root rot in pea intercropped with oat was mostly higher than in the pea monoculture, attributed to the prevalence of similar species, including Fusarium pathogens, common to both crop species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1510–1701

Title

Root rot suppression mechanisms in lentil promoted by organic intercropping

Myriam R. Fernandez; Lobna Abdellatif; Noe Waelchli; et al. Crop Science 2026. doi:10.1002/csc2.70238

Other claims from this paper (6)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Major defense-related phytohormones and their derivatives in pea did not show a clear response to aphid infestations.

Treatment
aphid infestationse0
Interactor
aphide0pest
Outcome
major defense-related phytohormones and their derivativese0
Direction
did not show clear responsee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–3
e0

“major defense-related phytohormones and their derivatives in pea did not show clear response to aphid infestations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 515–629

Title

Pea transcriptional and phytohormonal responses to adapted and non-adapted aphid biotypes at early stages of infestation

Rémi Ollivier; Stéphanie Robin; Marc Galland; et al. Scientific Reports 2026. doi:10.1038/s41598-026-38098-2

Other claims from this paper (5)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The number of differentially expressed genes increased over time in pea genotypes infested with pea-adapted aphids.

Treatment
infested with pea-adapted aphidse0
Interactor
pea-adapted aphidse0pest
Outcome
number of differentially expressed genes (DEGs)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–3
e0

“the number of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) increased over time in pea genotypes infested with pea-adapted aphids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 667–788

Title

Pea transcriptional and phytohormonal responses to adapted and non-adapted aphid biotypes at early stages of infestation

Rémi Ollivier; Stéphanie Robin; Marc Galland; et al. Scientific Reports 2026. doi:10.1038/s41598-026-38098-2

Other claims from this paper (5)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Significantly fewer differentially expressed genes were detected in pea genotypes infested with non-adapted aphids.

Treatment
infested with non-adapted aphidse0
Interactor
non-adapted aphidse0pest
Outcome
DEGse0
Direction
fewere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–3
e0

“while significantly fewer DEGs were detected in genotypes infested with non-adapted aphids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–880

Title

Pea transcriptional and phytohormonal responses to adapted and non-adapted aphid biotypes at early stages of infestation

Rémi Ollivier; Stéphanie Robin; Marc Galland; et al. Scientific Reports 2026. doi:10.1038/s41598-026-38098-2

Other claims from this paper (5)
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The most resistant of the four investigated pea genotypes showed the fewest DEGs to both aphid biotypes.

Material
The most resistant of the four investigated pea genotypese0
Interactor
aphid biotypese0pest
Outcome
fewest DEGse0

Verbatim

t0

“Pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–3
e0

“The most resistant of the four investigated pea genotypes showed the fewest DEGs to both aphid biotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–985

Title

Pea transcriptional and phytohormonal responses to adapted and non-adapted aphid biotypes at early stages of infestation

Rémi Ollivier; Stéphanie Robin; Marc Galland; et al. Scientific Reports 2026. doi:10.1038/s41598-026-38098-2

Other claims from this paper (5)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aphid infestation of the three other pea genotypes commonly induced down-regulation of various pathways involved in fundamental biological processes.

Treatment
Aphid infestatione0
Interactor
Aphide0pest
Outcome
various pathways involved in fundamental biological processese0
Direction
down-regulatione0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–3
e0

“Aphid infestation of the three other pea genotypes commonly induced down-regulation of various pathways involved in fundamental biological processes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 987–1135

Title

Pea transcriptional and phytohormonal responses to adapted and non-adapted aphid biotypes at early stages of infestation

Rémi Ollivier; Stéphanie Robin; Marc Galland; et al. Scientific Reports 2026. doi:10.1038/s41598-026-38098-2

Other claims from this paper (5)
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Comparison of transcriptional data of pea genotypes identified candidate genes potentially involved in the aphid resistance conferred by ApRVII.

Gene
ApRVIIe0
Outcome
candidate genes potentially involved in the aphid resistancee0

Verbatim

t0

“Pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–3
e0

“Comparison of the transcriptional data of pea genotypes identified candidate genes potentially involved in the aphid resistance conferred by ApRVII”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1137–1284

Title

Pea transcriptional and phytohormonal responses to adapted and non-adapted aphid biotypes at early stages of infestation

Rémi Ollivier; Stéphanie Robin; Marc Galland; et al. Scientific Reports 2026. doi:10.1038/s41598-026-38098-2

Other claims from this paper (5)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Germination percentage of pea was not affected by bio-inoculation and remained high (93.3-100%).

Taxon
Pisum sativumLathyrus oleraceust0
Treatment
bio-inoculatione0
Outcome
germination percentagee0
Direction
not affectede0
Value
93.3–100%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Pisum sativum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–113
e0

“germination percentage remained high across all treatments (93.3–100%) and was not affected by bio-inoculation or osmotic potential”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–674

Title

Microbial Bio-Inoculation Effects on the Seed Germination Dynamics and Field Performance of Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Under Osmotic Stress and Fertilization in the Amazonas Region of Peru

Francisco Guevara-Fernández; Sebastian Casas-Niño; Milagros Ninoska Munoz-Salas; et al. AgriEngineering 2026. doi:10.3390/agriengineering8040155

Other claims from this paper (14)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Germination percentage of pea was not affected by osmotic potential and remained high (93.3-100%).

Taxon
Pisum sativumLathyrus oleraceust0
Treatment
osmotic potentiale0
Outcome
germination percentagee0
Direction
not affectede0
Value
93.3–100%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Pisum sativum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–113
e0

“germination percentage remained high across all treatments (93.3–100%) and was not affected by bio-inoculation or osmotic potential”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–674

Title

Microbial Bio-Inoculation Effects on the Seed Germination Dynamics and Field Performance of Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Under Osmotic Stress and Fertilization in the Amazonas Region of Peru

Francisco Guevara-Fernández; Sebastian Casas-Niño; Milagros Ninoska Munoz-Salas; et al. AgriEngineering 2026. doi:10.3390/agriengineering8040155

Other claims from this paper (14)