Fungi 11,917 claims

Fungi. 259 families, 1,441 taxa.

259 entries, A to Z

Acaulosporaceae20 claims · 15 papersAcrocalymmaceae3 claims · 1 paperAgaricaceae20 claims · 6 papersAmanitaceae12 claims · 4 papersAmbisporaceae1 claim · 1 paperAmphisphaeriaceae11 claims · 4 papersAmylocorticiaceae124 claims · 35 papersAnthracoideaceae3 claims · 1 paperApiosporaceae29 claims · 10 papersArchaeosporaceae1 claim · 1 paperArctomiaceae1 claim · 1 paperArthoniaceae10 claims · 3 papersArthrodermataceae9 claims · 5 papersAscobolaceae1 claim · 1 paperAscodesmidaceae1 claim · 1 paperAscodichaenaceae2 claims · 1 paperAspergillaceae702 claims · 246 papersAtheliaceae1 claim · 1 paperAuriculariaceae1 claim · 1 paperBambusicolaceae2 claims · 1 paperBionectriaceae20 claims · 8 papersBolbitiaceae10 claims · 2 papersBoletaceae5 claims · 3 papersBoletinellaceae2 claims · 1 paperBondarzewiaceae39 claims · 12 papersBotryosphaeriaceae356 claims · 105 papersCaliciaceae8 claims · 6 papersCalycidiaceae2 claims · 1 paperCandelariaceae4 claims · 4 papersCenangiaceae2 claims · 1 paperCeratobasidiaceae399 claims · 144 papersCeratocystidaceae19 claims · 8 papersChaetomellaceae2 claims · 1 paperChaetomiaceae32 claims · 20 papersChaetosphaeriaceae1 claim · 1 paperChoanephoraceae9 claims · 2 papersCladoniaceae61 claims · 37 papersCladosporiaceae60 claims · 29 papersClavicipitaceae61 claims · 24 papersColeosporiaceae6 claims · 3 papersCollemataceae3 claims · 3 papersConiocybaceae5 claims · 1 paperConiothyriaceae1 claim · 1 paperCordycipitaceae30 claims · 11 papersCorticiaceae20 claims · 7 papersCortinariaceae5 claims · 4 papersCoryneliaceae3 claims · 1 paperCorynesporascaceae20 claims · 9 papersCrossopsoraceae1 claim · 1 paperCryphonectriaceae48 claims · 7 papersCryptococcaceae2 claims · 2 papersCunninghamellaceae5 claims · 1 paperCyphellaceae4 claims · 1 paperCystobasidiaceae1 claim · 1 paperCytosporaceae40 claims · 11 papersDebaryomycetaceae84 claims · 56 papersDermateaceae16 claims · 8 papersDiaporthaceae76 claims · 25 papersDiatrypaceae4 claims · 4 papersDidymellaceae190 claims · 58 papersDidymosphaeriaceae15 claims · 5 papersDipodascaceae12 claims · 7 papersDiscinellaceae2 claims · 1 paperDiversisporaceae10 claims · 3 papersDothioraceae3 claims · 1 paperDrepanopezizaceae12 claims · 3 papersEchinodontiaceae3 claims · 1 paperElsinoaceae8 claims · 4 papersEndogonaceae1 claim · 1 paperEntomophthoraceae1 claim · 1 paperEntorrhizaceae4 claims · 1 paperEntrophosporaceae10 claims · 8 papersEntylomataceae1 claim · 1 paperErysiphaceae315 claims · 92 papersExidiaceae2 claims · 2 papersExobasidiaceae10 claims · 4 papersFilobasidiaceae2 claims · 1 paperFomitopsidaceae1 claim · 1 paperGeastraceae1 claim · 1 paperGeminibasidiaceae2 claims · 2 papersGeosiphonaceae3 claims · 1 paperGigasporaceae54 claims · 23 papersGlomeraceae166 claims · 67 papersGlomerellaceae760 claims · 187 papersGlomosporiaceae6 claims · 1 paperGloniaceae4 claims · 3 papersGlugeidae4 claims · 2 papersGnomoniaceae8 claims · 3 papersGodroniaceae11 claims · 2 papersGolubeviaceae1 claim · 1 paperGomphaceae1 claim · 1 paperGraphidaceae1 claim · 1 paperGyalectaceae3 claims · 3 papersGymnosporangiaceae26 claims · 4 papersHelicobasidiaceae4 claims · 1 paperHelotiaceae9 claims · 3 papersHemipholiotaceae2 claims · 1 paperHerpotrichiellaceae2 claims · 2 papersHyaloscyphaceae9 claims · 4 papersHydnaceae6 claims · 6 papersHydnangiaceae18 claims · 8 papersHygrophoraceae4 claims · 3 papersHymenochaetaceae12 claims · 7 papersHymenogastraceae4 claims · 2 papersHypocreaceae346 claims · 133 papersHyponectriaceae2 claims · 2 papersHypoxylaceae1 claim · 1 paperIcmadophilaceae1 claim · 1 paperInocybaceae4 claims · 2 papersIrpicaceae13 claims · 4 papersKuehneromycetaceae1 claim · 1 paperLasiosphaeriaceae1 claim · 1 paperLecanoraceae1 claim · 1 paperLecideaceae2 claims · 2 papersLeptosphaeriaceae92 claims · 27 papersLobariaceae18 claims · 13 papersLophiostomataceae2 claims · 1 paperLyophyllaceae3 claims · 1 paperMagnaporthaceae52 claims · 16 papersMalasseziaceae1 claim · 1 paperMalmideaceae5 claims · 1 paperMarasmiaceae23 claims · 12 papersMarthamycetaceae1 claim · 1 paperMassarinaceae14 claims · 5 papersMegasporaceae1 claim · 1 paperMelampsoraceae22 claims · 8 papersMelanconiellaceae3 claims · 2 papersMelanommataceae7 claims · 3 papersMeliolaceae3 claims · 1 paperMeripilaceae2 claims · 1 paperMetschnikowiaceae13 claims · 5 papersMicareaceae1 claim · 1 paperMicroascaceae1 claim · 1 paperMicrobotryaceae11 claims · 4 papersMicrodochiaceae8 claims · 5 papersMilesinaceae2 claims · 1 paperMollisiaceae3 claims · 2 papersMortierellaceae11 claims · 7 papersMrakiaceae2 claims · 1 paperMucoraceae13 claims · 5 papersMycenaceae4 claims · 4 papersMycoblastaceae1 claim · 1 paperMycocaliciaceae1 claim · 1 paperMycosphaerellaceae336 claims · 88 papersMyxotrichaceae3 claims · 3 papersNectriaceae1,834 claims · 571 papersNeocamarosporiaceae4 claims · 1 paperNephromataceae7 claims · 1 paperNiaceae2 claims · 1 paperNiessliaceae1 claim · 1 paperOlpidiaceae13 claims · 1 paperOmphalotaceae3 claims · 3 papersOphiocordycipitaceae18 claims · 11 papersOphiostomataceae4 claims · 4 papersOrbiliaceae14 claims · 5 papersPannariaceae5 claims · 2 papersParaglomeraceae6 claims · 6 papersParmeliaceae76 claims · 42 papersPatellariaceae1 claim · 1 paperPaxillaceae10 claims · 4 papersPeltigeraceae15 claims · 9 papersPeniophoraceae2 claims · 1 paperPericoniaceae1 claim · 1 paperPertusariaceae2 claims · 2 papersPezizaceae4 claims · 2 papersPhacidiaceae9 claims · 2 papersPhaeolaceae2 claims · 1 paperPhaeomoniellaceae13 claims · 5 papersPhaeosphaeriaceae62 claims · 16 papersPhakopsoraceae49 claims · 12 papersPhleogenaceae2 claims · 1 paperPhlogicylindriaceae2 claims · 1 paperPhlyctidaceae1 claim · 1 paperPhragmidiaceae5 claims · 2 papersPhyllachoraceae19 claims · 2 papersPhyllostictaceae25 claims · 10 papersPhysalacriaceae43 claims · 17 papersPhysciaceae6 claims · 6 papersPhysodermataceae5 claims · 2 papersPichiaceae12 claims · 8 papersPileolariaceae2 claims · 1 paperPilocarpaceae1 claim · 1 paperPisolithaceae13 claims · 6 papersPlectosphaerellaceae244 claims · 70 papersPleosporaceae822 claims · 251 papersPleurostomataceae2 claims · 1 paperPleurotaceae33 claims · 9 papersPloettnerulaceae50 claims · 13 papersPluteaceae1 claim · 1 paperPolyporaceae54 claims · 18 papersPorinaceae3 claims · 1 paperProtomycetaceae3 claims · 1 paperPsathyrellaceae1 claim · 1 paperPseudopyrenochaetaceae4 claims · 2 papersPucciniaceae507 claims · 105 papersPucciniastraceae7 claims · 3 papersPulvinulaceae1 claim · 1 paperPyriculariaceae374 claims · 89 papersPyronemataceae5 claims · 4 papersRamalinaceae23 claims · 10 papersRaveneliaceae4 claims · 1 paperRhizocarpaceae3 claims · 1 paperRhizopodaceae39 claims · 15 papersRhizopogonaceae29 claims · 5 papersRhynchogastremaceae1 claim · 1 paperRhytismataceae4 claims · 4 papersRoccellaceae2 claims · 2 papersRussulaceae4 claims · 3 papersRutstroemiaceae19 claims · 4 papersSaccharomycetaceae75 claims · 57 papersSaccharomycodaceae4 claims · 4 papersSaccharomycopsidaceae3 claims · 1 paperSaccotheciaceae8 claims · 7 papersSarocladiaceae15 claims · 6 papersSchizoparmaceae8 claims · 2 papersSchizophyllaceae3 claims · 2 papersSchizosaccharomycetaceae11 claims · 8 papersSclerodermataceae9 claims · 2 papersSclerotiniaceae1,093 claims · 280 papersSeptobasidiaceae2 claims · 1 paperSerendipitaceae15 claims · 5 papersSerpulaceae1 claim · 1 paperSordariaceae4 claims · 3 papersSphaerophoraceae1 claim · 1 paperSphaerophragmiaceae4 claims · 2 papersSporidiobolaceae20 claims · 7 papersSporocadaceae64 claims · 19 papersStachybotryaceae28 claims · 12 papersStereaceae10 claims · 4 papersStereocaulaceae7 claims · 6 papersStrophariaceae1 claim · 1 paperSuillaceae10 claims · 6 papersSympoventuriaceae1 claim · 1 paperSyncephalastraceae1 claim · 1 paperSynchytriaceae6 claims · 3 papersSynnemasporellaceae1 claim · 1 paperTaphrinaceae1 claim · 1 paperTeloschistaceae20 claims · 7 papersTeratosphaeriaceae6 claims · 2 papersThelebolaceae1 claim · 1 paperThelephoraceae9 claims · 6 papersThermoascaceae3 claims · 1 paperTilletiaceae24 claims · 7 papersTogniniaceae13 claims · 4 papersTrapeliaceae2 claims · 2 papersTrichocomaceae18 claims · 12 papersTricholomataceae6 claims · 2 papersTricladiaceae2 claims · 1 paperTuberaceae43 claims · 15 papersTulasnellaceae12 claims · 4 papersUmbilicariaceae14 claims · 5 papersUstilaginaceae52 claims · 18 papersVenturiaceae56 claims · 14 papersVerrucariaceae6 claims · 3 papersWallemiaceae1 claim · 1 paperWickerhamomycetaceae3 claims · 2 papersXylariaceae7 claims · 3 papersXylographaceae1 claim · 1 paperAbove family level569 claims · 259 papers
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Colonies of the isolate were dark green with a velvety surface, concentric rings and a white marginal zone.

Taxon
Cladosporium anthropophilumCladosporium anthropophilumt0
Outcome
colonies were dark green with a velvety surfacee0

Verbatim

e0

“the colonies were dark green with a velvety surface, showing concentric rings and a white marginal zone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1562–1665
t0

“Cladosporium anthropophilum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–63

Title

First Report of Fruit Rot Caused by Cladosporium anthropophilum on Strawberry in China

Yanni Liu; Hongbo Cui; Qingyan Han; et al. Plant Disease 2026. doi:10.1094/pdis-12-25-2594-pdn

Other claims from this paper (11)
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conidiophores were hyaline, straight or slightly curved and mostly unbranched.

Taxon
Cladosporium anthropophilumCladosporium anthropophilumt0
Outcome
conidiophores were hyaline, straight or slightly curved, and mostly unbranchede0

Verbatim

e0

“The conidiophores were hyaline, straight or slightly curved, and mostly unbranched”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1667–1749
t0

“Cladosporium anthropophilum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–63

Title

First Report of Fruit Rot Caused by Cladosporium anthropophilum on Strawberry in China

Yanni Liu; Hongbo Cui; Qingyan Han; et al. Plant Disease 2026. doi:10.1094/pdis-12-25-2594-pdn

Other claims from this paper (11)
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conidia were ovoid, lemon-shaped or fusiform, and unicellular.

Taxon
Cladosporium anthropophilumCladosporium anthropophilumt0
Outcome
conidia were ovoid, lemon-shaped or fusiform, unicellulare0

Verbatim

e0

“The conidia were ovoid, lemon-shaped or fusiform, unicellular”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1751–1812
t0

“Cladosporium anthropophilum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–63

Title

First Report of Fruit Rot Caused by Cladosporium anthropophilum on Strawberry in China

Yanni Liu; Hongbo Cui; Qingyan Han; et al. Plant Disease 2026. doi:10.1094/pdis-12-25-2594-pdn

Other claims from this paper (11)
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conidia measured 3.22 – 13.5 µm × 2.08 – 5.32 µm (n=100).

Taxon
Cladosporium anthropophilumCladosporium anthropophilumt0
Outcome
measurede0
Value
3.22 – 13.5 µm × 2.08 – 5.32 µme0

Verbatim

e0

“measured 3.22 – 13.5 µm × 2.08 – 5.32 µm (n=100)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1818–1866
t0

“Cladosporium anthropophilum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–63

Title

First Report of Fruit Rot Caused by Cladosporium anthropophilum on Strawberry in China

Yanni Liu; Hongbo Cui; Qingyan Han; et al. Plant Disease 2026. doi:10.1094/pdis-12-25-2594-pdn

Other claims from this paper (11)
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The ITS and ACT sequences were identical among the ten isolates.

Taxon
Cladosporium anthropophilumCladosporium anthropophilumt0
Gene
ITS and ACTe0
Outcome
sequences obtained were identicale0
Qualifier
among the ten isolatese0

Verbatim

e0

“The ITS and ACT sequences obtained were identical among the ten isolates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2542–2614
t0

“Cladosporium anthropophilum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–63

Title

First Report of Fruit Rot Caused by Cladosporium anthropophilum on Strawberry in China

Yanni Liu; Hongbo Cui; Qingyan Han; et al. Plant Disease 2026. doi:10.1094/pdis-12-25-2594-pdn

Other claims from this paper (11)
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The ITS sequence showed 99.3% identity with C. anthropophilum.

Taxon
C. anthropophilumCladosporium anthropophilume0
Gene
ITSe0
Outcome
identitye0
Value
99.3%e0

Verbatim

e0

“the ITS sequence showed 99.3% identity with C. anthropophilum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2912–2973

Title

First Report of Fruit Rot Caused by Cladosporium anthropophilum on Strawberry in China

Yanni Liu; Hongbo Cui; Qingyan Han; et al. Plant Disease 2026. doi:10.1094/pdis-12-25-2594-pdn

Other claims from this paper (11)
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The ACT sequence showed 98.8% similarity to C. anthropophilum.

Taxon
C. anthropophilumCladosporium anthropophilume0
Gene
ACTe0
Outcome
similaritye0
Value
98.8%e0

Verbatim

e0

“the ACT sequence exhibited 98.8% similarity to C. anthropophilum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3013–3077

Title

First Report of Fruit Rot Caused by Cladosporium anthropophilum on Strawberry in China

Yanni Liu; Hongbo Cui; Qingyan Han; et al. Plant Disease 2026. doi:10.1094/pdis-12-25-2594-pdn

Other claims from this paper (11)
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phylogenetic analyses of ITS and ACT placed isolate CMGF-23 within the C. anthropophilum clade with support.

Taxon
C. anthropophilumCladosporium anthropophilume0
Material
CMGF-23e0
Outcome
placed isolate CMGF-23 within the C. anthropophilum cladee0

Verbatim

e0

“placed isolate CMGF-23 within the C. anthropophilum clade with support”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3213–3283

Title

First Report of Fruit Rot Caused by Cladosporium anthropophilum on Strawberry in China

Yanni Liu; Hongbo Cui; Qingyan Han; et al. Plant Disease 2026. doi:10.1094/pdis-12-25-2594-pdn

Other claims from this paper (11)
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

VdEGe1 of Verticillium dahliae was classified into glycoside hydrolase family 45 (GH45).

Taxon
Verticillium dahliaeVerticillium dahliaet0
Gene
VdEGe1e1
Outcome
classified into the glycoside hydrolase family 45 (GH45)e1

Verbatim

e1

“VdEGe1 was classified into the glycoside hydrolase family 45 (GH45)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1192–1259
t0

“Verticillium dahliae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–67

Title

VdEGe1, a cell wall-degrading enzyme gene from Verticillium dahliae required for cotton pathogenesis

Yuanjing Li; Ruixiang Yuan; Yongtai Li; et al. BMC Microbiology 2026. doi:10.1186/s12866-026-04977-x

Other claims from this paper (11)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The VdEGe1 knockout mutant of V. dahliae showed impaired colony expansion and hyphal growth.

Taxon
Verticillium dahliaeVerticillium dahliaet0
Treatment
ΔVdEGe1 knockoute1
Gene
VdEGe1e1
Outcome
colony expansion, hyphal growthe1
Direction
impairede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“The ΔVdEGe1 knockout mutant exhibited impaired colony expansion, hyphal growth, sporulation, and spore germination, accompanied by severely attenuated virulence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1380–1540
t0

“Verticillium dahliae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–67

Title

VdEGe1, a cell wall-degrading enzyme gene from Verticillium dahliae required for cotton pathogenesis

Yuanjing Li; Ruixiang Yuan; Yongtai Li; et al. BMC Microbiology 2026. doi:10.1186/s12866-026-04977-x

Other claims from this paper (11)