Paper · 2002 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

AUTOTOXICITY OF BARLEY

Moncef Ben-Hammouda; Habib Ghorbal; Robert J. Kremer; et al.

5
claims
7
verbatim quotes
34
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT Allelopathic potential of a crop species varies depending on stage of growth. Because allelopathy of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), an important cereal grain adapted to semi-arid conditions of northern Tunisia, has not been widely reported, a study was conducted to determine i) the potential autotoxicity of barley and ii) the differential allelopathic potential of barley plant components over four phenological stages. The study involved experiments with barley seed germination and seedling growth bioassay techniques for detection of allelopathic activity. Plant parts of field-grown ‘Rihane’ barley were extracted with distilled water. At growth stage 4 (stems not well developed), whole plants were extracted. Thereafter, roots, stems, and leaves were extracted separately. Water extracts of ‘Rihane’ barley plant parts were bioassayed on four varieties of barley. Seedling growth bioassays revealed autotoxicity of barley, which appeared to be more pronounced on radicle growth than coleoptile growth, especially when plants near physiological maturity were extracted. Autotoxicity was not significant when ‘Rihane’ barley was simultaneously the donor and recipient of water extracts. Leaves were the most important source of allelopathic substances. Root extracts were least inhibitory toward both radicle and coleoptile growth. Results suggest qualitative and quantitative changes in allelopathic substances in barley plant parts during plant development.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Barley extracts were more autotoxic to radicle than coleoptile growth, especially near donor maturity.

Treatment
autotoxicity of barleye0
Outcome
radicle growthe0
Direction
more pronouncede0
Qualifier
especially when plants near physiological maturity were extractede0
Comparator
coleoptile growthe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seedling growth bioassays revealed autotoxicity of barley, which appeared to be more pronounced on radicle growth than coleoptile growth, especially when plants near physiological maturity were extracted.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–1083 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Autotoxicity was not significant when Rihane barley supplied and received its own extracts.

Material
‘Rihane’e0
Outcome
Autotoxicitye0
Qualifier
simultaneously the donor and recipient of water extractse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Autotoxicity was not significant when ‘Rihane’ barley was simultaneously the donor and recipient of water extracts.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1084–1199 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaves were the main source of allelopathic substances.

Organ / stage
Leavese0
Outcome
most important source of allelopathic substancese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaves were the most important source of allelopathic substances.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1200–1265 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 16–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root extracts were least inhibitory to radicle and coleoptile growth.

Treatment
Root extractse0
Outcome
radicle and coleoptile growthe0
Direction
least inhibitorye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root extracts were least inhibitory toward both radicle and coleoptile growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1266–1344 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 16–22 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Allelopathic substances appear to change in quality and amount during barley development.

Organ / stage
plant partse0
Outcome
qualitative and quantitative changes in allelopathic substancese0
Qualifier
during plant developmente0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results suggest qualitative and quantitative changes in allelopathic substances in barley plant parts during plant development.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1345–1472 · show in text ↑

botanical · growth · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

84 papers: 48 positive, 36 negative or no effect

47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

80 papers more in this group

See all 84 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.