Paper · 2013 · Crop Science

Yield and Bread‐Making Potential of Spring Wheat Under Mineral and Organic Fertilization

Christine M. Rieux; Anne Vanasse; Martin H. Chantigny; et al.

8
claims
23
verbatim quotes
13
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT The food industry is increasingly interested in bread wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) produced under low‐input farming. However, the influence of soil management practices and N source type on wheat is unclear. Spring wheat (‘AC Brio’) was grown in 2009 and 2010 near Quebec City, QC, Canada, on a silty clay (SC) and a sandy loam (SL) soil under cool and wet climatic conditions. Nitrogen treatments comprised a control (mineral fertilizer containing P and K only [PK]), a complete mineral fertilizer (NPK), and three organic N sources (liquid swine manure [LSM], liquid dairy cattle manure [LCM], and solid poultry manure [SPM]) applied in the spring to moldboard plowed and minimum till plots. Even though some differences were found in crop N uptake between soil types and production years, the average amount of grains produced at harvest per unit of N applied was greater with NPK (8.5 kg grain kg −1 N applied) than with animal manures but was similar among LSM (6.4), SPM (5.8), and LCM (5.0). The use of LSM and SPM resulted in grain yields similar to those obtained with NPK. The grain protein and gluten content were generally greater with NPK (150 g protein kg −1 and 105 g gluten kg −1 ) than with the organic N sources (142 to 144 g protein kg −1 and 94 to 100 g gluten kg −1 ). However, these disparities had no effect on bread loaf volumes (average of 790 mL). The use of animal manures appears as an interesting alternative to mineral N fertilizers to produce good quality bread‐making wheat.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK produced more grain per unit N than animal manures.

Material
AC Brioe1
Treatment
NPKe0
Outcome
amount of grains produced at harvest per unit of N appliede0
Direction
greatere0
Value
8.5 kg grain kg −1 N appliede0
Comparator
animal manurese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–48 · show in text ↑
e1

“Spring wheat (‘AC Brio’)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 218–242 · show in text ↑
e0

“the average amount of grains produced at harvest per unit of N applied was greater with NPK (8.5 kg grain kg −1 N applied) than with animal manures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–949 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain produced per N applied was similar among liquid swine, solid poultry, and liquid cattle manure.

Material
AC Brioe1
Treatment
LSMe0
Outcome
similare0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
SPMe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–48 · show in text ↑
e1

“Spring wheat (‘AC Brio’)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 218–242 · show in text ↑
e0

“was similar among LSM (6.4), SPM (5.8), and LCM (5.0)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 954–1007 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Liquid swine manure gave grain yield similar to NPK.

Material
AC Brioe1
Treatment
LSMe0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
NPKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–48 · show in text ↑
e1

“Spring wheat (‘AC Brio’)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 218–242 · show in text ↑
e0

“The use of LSM and SPM resulted in grain yields similar to those obtained with NPK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1009–1091 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Solid poultry manure gave grain yield similar to NPK.

Material
AC Brioe1
Treatment
SPMe0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
NPKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–48 · show in text ↑
e1

“Spring wheat (‘AC Brio’)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 218–242 · show in text ↑
e0

“The use of LSM and SPM resulted in grain yields similar to those obtained with NPK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1009–1091 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK generally gave greater grain protein content than organic N sources.

Material
AC Brioe1
Treatment
NPKe0
Outcome
grain proteine0
Direction
greatere0
Value
150 g protein kg −1e0
Qualifier
142 to 144 g protein kg −1e0
Comparator
organic N sourcese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–48 · show in text ↑
e1

“Spring wheat (‘AC Brio’)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 218–242 · show in text ↑
e0

“The grain protein and gluten content were generally greater with NPK (150 g protein kg −1 and 105 g gluten kg −1 ) than with the organic N sources (142 to 144 g protein kg −1 and 94 to 100 g gluten kg −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1093–1298 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK generally gave greater grain gluten content than organic N sources.

Material
AC Brioe1
Treatment
NPKe0
Outcome
gluten contente0
Direction
greatere0
Value
105 g gluten kg −1e0
Qualifier
94 to 100 g gluten kg −1e0
Comparator
organic N sourcese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–48 · show in text ↑
e1

“Spring wheat (‘AC Brio’)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 218–242 · show in text ↑
e0

“The grain protein and gluten content were generally greater with NPK (150 g protein kg −1 and 105 g gluten kg −1 ) than with the organic N sources (142 to 144 g protein kg −1 and 94 to 100 g gluten kg −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1093–1298 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer differences in protein and gluten did not alter bread loaf volume.

Material
AC Brioe1
Treatment
these disparitiese0
Outcome
bread loaf volumese0
Direction
no effecte0
Value
790 mLe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–48 · show in text ↑
e1

“Spring wheat (‘AC Brio’)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 218–242 · show in text ↑
e0

“these disparities had no effect on bread loaf volumes (average of 790 mL)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1309–1382 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend animal manures as an alternative to mineral N for bread-making wheat.

Outcome
animal manures appears as an interesting alternative to mineral N fertilizerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–48 · show in text ↑
e0

“The use of animal manures appears as an interesting alternative to mineral N fertilizers to produce good quality bread‐making wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1384–1515 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

566 papers: 501 positive, 65 negative or no effect

500 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

562 papers more in this group

See all 566 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.