Paper · 2005 · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Effect of nitrogen and manure fertilizer on grain quality, baking and rheological properties of wheat grown in sandy soil

Salah M Al‐Eid

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
13
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Winter wheat was grown under various nitrogen (N) fertilizer regimes (with/without manure application) under calcareous sandy soils, control wheat being grown without fertilization. Six levels of N fertilizer were applied. The technological and baking characteristics of the wheat were closely related to N and nitrogen + manure (NM) fertilization. Contents of protein increased with increase in fertilization level, which also improved the rheological properties of dough and baking quality. N fertilization increased farinograph stability time, which increased with increasing flour protein content. NM fertilization affected protein content as well as farinograph stability time and farinograph maximum viscosity, thereby affecting the relationship between these properties. The increase in bread volume due to fertilizers was more noticeable with NM than with N. Application of 60 t ha −1 manure along with 200 kg ha −1 N onwards improved technological properties of flour in comparison with wheat grown with the basic N fertilizer only. Copyright © 2005 Society of Chemical Industry

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher fertilization increased wheat protein content.

Treatment
increase in fertilization levele0
Outcome
Contents of proteine0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Contents of protein increased with increase in fertilization level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 358–424 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization improved dough rheology and baking quality.

Treatment
fertilizatione1
Outcome
rheological properties of dough and baking qualitye0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“which also improved the rheological properties of dough and baking quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 426–500 · show in text ↑
e1

“Contents of protein increased with increase in fertilization level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 358–424 · show in text ↑
t0

“fertilizer on grain quality, baking and rheological properties of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilization increased farinograph stability time.

Treatment
N fertilizatione0
Outcome
farinograph stability timee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N fertilization increased farinograph stability time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 502–554 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–101 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Farinograph stability time increased with flour protein content.

Organ / stage
floure0
Compound
proteine0
Outcome
farinograph stability timee0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“farinograph stability time, which increased with increasing flour protein content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–609 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen plus manure affected protein content, farinograph stability time, and maximum viscosity.

Treatment
NM fertilizatione0
Outcome
protein content as well as farinograph stability time and farinograph maximum viscositye0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NM fertilization affected protein content as well as farinograph stability time and farinograph maximum viscosity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–724 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer increased bread volume more with nitrogen plus manure than nitrogen alone.

Treatment
NMe0
Outcome
bread volumee0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
Ne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increase in bread volume due to fertilizers was more noticeable with NM than with N.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–875 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The specified manure and nitrogen regime improved flour technological properties over nitrogen alone.

Treatment
60 t ha −1 manure along with 200 kg ha −1 N onwardse0
Outcome
technological properties of floure0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
basic N fertilizer onlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 60 t ha −1 manure along with 200 kg ha −1 N onwards improved technological properties of flour in comparison with wheat grown with the basic N fertilizer only.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–1050 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: grain · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

154 papers: 119 positive, 35 negative or no effect

118 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

150 papers more in this group

See all 154 papers →

fertilization · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

566 papers: 501 positive, 65 negative or no effect

500 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

562 papers more in this group

See all 566 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.