Paper · 2014 · Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

Winter Wheat Quality Responses to Water, Environment, and Nitrogen Fertilization

Hyejin Park; David E. Clay; Robert G. Hall; et al.

7
claims
18
verbatim quotes
26
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Decreasing carbon (C) footprints by reducing nitrogen (N) and water inputs has been speculated to have negative impacts on wheat grain yield and flour processing quality. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of N and water stress on winter wheat grain yield, protein composition, and dough quality. Wheat fertilized at two N rates (unfertilized and recommended) was grown under water-stressed and well-watered environments. Nitrogen and water stress were measured using the 13C isotopic approach. Research showed that (1) N fertilizer and the water-management environment produced similar impacts on wheat quality and yield loss due to N stress and yield loss due to water stress (YLWS); (2) N fertilizer increased flour protein, dough stability, and relative concentration of glutenin (%Glu), unextractable polymeric protein (UPP), and relative amount of high-molecular-weight glutenin subunits (HMW-GS/LMW-GS); (3) the well-watered environment reduced protein contents when N mineralization was low, whereas it did not influence protein content when mineralization was high; and (4) the %Glu was negatively correlated with yield loss due to N stress (YLNS) and positively correlated with stability. This study showed that a clear understanding of the complex relationship between soil variability and climatic conditions should make it possible to develop adaptive management practices, increase profitability, and improve quality.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N fertilizer and the water-management environment produced similar impacts on wheat quality and yield loss due to N stress and water stress

Outcome
wheat quality and yield loss due to N stresse1
Qualifier
similar impactse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat Quality Responses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–30 · show in text ↑
e1

“N fertilizer and the water-management environment produced similar impacts on wheat quality and yield loss due to N stress and yield loss due to water stress (YLWS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 541–705 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N fertilizer increased flour protein and dough stability relative to unfertilized wheat

Treatment
N fertilizere1
Outcome
flour protein, dough stabilitye1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
unfertilizede2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat Quality Responses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–30 · show in text ↑
e1

“N fertilizer increased flour protein, dough stability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–764 · show in text ↑
e2

“Wheat fertilized at two N rates (unfertilized and recommended)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 318–380 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N fertilizer increased the relative concentration of glutenin (%Glu), unextractable polymeric protein and relative amount of HMW-GS/LMW-GS relative to unfertilized wheat

Treatment
N fertilizere3
Outcome
relative concentration of glutenin (%Glu), unextractable polymeric protein (UPP), and relative amount of high-molecular-weight glutenin subunits (HMW-GS/LMW-GS)e1
Direction
increasede3
Comparator
unfertilizede2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat Quality Responses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–30 · show in text ↑
e1

“relative concentration of glutenin (%Glu), unextractable polymeric protein (UPP), and relative amount of high-molecular-weight glutenin subunits (HMW-GS/LMW-GS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–930 · show in text ↑
e2

“Wheat fertilized at two N rates (unfertilized and recommended)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 318–380 · show in text ↑
e3

“N fertilizer increased flour protein, dough stability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–764 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The well-watered environment reduced protein contents when N mineralization was low

Treatment
well-watered environmente1
Outcome
protein contentse1
Direction
reducede1
Qualifier
when N mineralization was lowe1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat Quality Responses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–30 · show in text ↑
e1

“the well-watered environment reduced protein contents when N mineralization was low”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–1019 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The well-watered environment did not influence protein content when N mineralization was high

Treatment
well-watered environmente2
Outcome
protein contente1
Direction
did not influencee1
Qualifier
when mineralization was highe1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat Quality Responses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–30 · show in text ↑
e1

“whereas it did not influence protein content when mineralization was high”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1094 · show in text ↑
e2

“the well-watered environment reduced protein contents when N mineralization was low”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–1019 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Percent Glu was negatively associated with yield loss due to N stress

Gene
%Glue1
Outcome
yield loss due to N stress (YLNS)e1
Direction
negatively correlatede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat Quality Responses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–30 · show in text ↑
e1

“%Glu was negatively correlated with yield loss due to N stress (YLNS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1108–1177 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Percent Glu was positively associated with dough stability

Gene
%Glue1
Outcome
stabilitye1
Direction
positively correlatede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat Quality Responses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–30 · show in text ↑
e1

“%Glu was negatively correlated with yield loss due to N stress (YLNS) and positively correlated with stability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1108–1218 · show in text ↑

climate site · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 7 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

fertilization · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

566 papers: 501 positive, 65 negative or no effect

500 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. no effect

562 papers more in this group

See all 566 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.