Paper · 2008 · Agronomy Journal

White Wheat Grain Quality Changes with Genotype, Nitrogen Fertilization, and Water Stress

Carolina Saint Pierre; C. James Peterson; Andrew S. Ross; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
62
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The production of hard white winter (HWW) wheats ( Triticum aestivum L.) with acceptable protein content and quality over different environments requires the correct combination of genotypes and management practices. The objectives of this study were to evaluate moisture deficit and N management on grain protein and quality of seven HWW and two soft white winter (SWW) genotypes, and to identify genotypes and traits that minimize grain quality variability. Plots were irrigated during grain fill to replace from 100 to <30% of estimated evapotranspiration (ET). Biomass of three genotypes across the irrigation levels was used as an integrated estimation of plant water stress at late grain fill. Biomass reductions under water stress tended to be higher if plots received high N fertilization. Water stress reduced grain yield, test weight, and kernel weight and diameter. Reducing irrigation increased average grain protein content from 116.4 to 128.3 g kg −1 . Nitrogen treatment did not affect grain yield. Additional N increased grain protein content and hardness for all genotypes. Reductions in test weight, and grain weight and diameter were observed under high N fertilization. High N fertilization would increase the numbers of kernels and extend the grain‐fill period, which result in greater water and heat stress. The SWW genotypes had greater reductions in test weight than HWW genotypes with increasing water stress. Among HWW genotypes, late maturing genotypes had larger reductions in test weight than early genotypes. In regions where late season water stress is common, early maturing genotypes are more likely to produce consistent grain quality.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress reduced biomass more under high nitrogen.

Treatment
water stresse0
Outcome
Biomass reductionse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
high N fertilizatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Biomass reductions under water stress tended to be higher if plots received high N fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–796 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 6–11 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress reduced grain yield.

Treatment
Water stresse0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Water stress reduced grain yield, test weight, and kernel weight and diameter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–875 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 6–11 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress reduced test weight and kernel weight and diameter.

Treatment
Water stresse0
Outcome
test weight, and kernel weight and diametere0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Water stress reduced grain yield, test weight, and kernel weight and diameter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–875 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 6–11 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced irrigation increased grain protein content from 116.4 to 128.3 g kg −1.

Treatment
Reducing irrigatione0
Outcome
average grain protein contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
128.3 g kg −1e0
Qualifier
116.4e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Reducing irrigation increased average grain protein content from 116.4 to 128.3 g kg −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–964 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 6–11 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen treatment did not affect grain yield.

Treatment
Nitrogen treatmente0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen treatment did not affect grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 967–1012 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 6–11 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Additional nitrogen increased grain protein content and hardness.

Treatment
Additional Ne0
Outcome
grain protein content and hardnesse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Additional N increased grain protein content and hardness for all genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1089 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 6–11 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High nitrogen reduced test weight, grain weight and diameter.

Treatment
high N fertilizatione0
Outcome
test weight, and grain weight and diametere0
Direction
Reductionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Reductions in test weight, and grain weight and diameter were observed under high N fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1091–1188 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 6–11 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High nitrogen was interpreted to increase kernel number and extend grain filling.

Treatment
High N fertilizatione0
Outcome
numbers of kernels and extend the grain‐fill periode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“High N fertilization would increase the numbers of kernels and extend the grain‐fill period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1281 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 6–11 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soft white winter genotypes had greater test weight reductions with water stress than hard white winter genotypes.

Material
SWW genotypese0
Outcome
reductions in test weighte0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
HWW genotypese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The SWW genotypes had greater reductions in test weight than HWW genotypes with increasing water stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1330–1433 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 6–11 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late maturing hard white winter genotypes had larger test weight reductions than early genotypes.

Material
late maturing genotypese0
Outcome
reductions in test weighte0
Direction
largere0
Comparator
early genotypese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“late maturing genotypes had larger reductions in test weight than early genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1456–1537 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 6–11 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Early maturing genotypes were recommended for consistent grain quality where late water stress occurs.

Material
early maturing genotypese0
Outcome
consistent grain qualitye0
Qualifier
late season water stresse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In regions where late season water stress is common, early maturing genotypes are more likely to produce consistent grain quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1539–1668 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 6–11 · show in text ↑

irrigation · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

80 papers: 50 positive, 30 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

76 papers more in this group

See all 80 papers →

nitrogen · quality: grain · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

96 papers: 70 positive, 26 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 70 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
    Late soil nitrogen increased common wheat test weight by 1.4%.

    Late‐Season Nitrogen Increases Improver Common and Durum Wheat Quality · 2015 · compared with control without N fertilization after the vegetative growth stage

    Opposite direction

92 papers more in this group

See all 96 papers →

drought · quality: grain · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 6 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

fertilization · quality: grain · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

154 papers: 119 positive, 35 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 119 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

150 papers more in this group

See all 154 papers →

drought · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

632 papers: 95 positive, 537 negative or no effect

536 papers in the same direction as this paper · 95 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

628 papers more in this group

See all 632 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

323 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1,737 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.