Abstract
Abstract A field experiment was carried out in Erzurum (Turkey) on winter wheat to analyse the effect of water stress at different growth stages – fully irrigated (FI), rainfed (R), early water stress (EWS), late water stress (LWS) and continuous water stress (CWS), on some quality characteristics – in the 1995–96 and 1996–97 cropping seasons. Water stress had a substantial effect on most of the quality characteristics. As averages of cropping seasons, CWS, EWS, R and LWS treatments decreased grain yields by 65.5, 40.6, 30.5 and 24.0 %, respectively, compared with the FI treatment. CWS increased grain protein content by 18.1 %, sedimentation volume by 16.5 %, wet gluten content by 21.9 % and decreased 1000‐kernel weight by 7.5 g compared with FI treatment. LWS caused an increase of 8.3 % in grain protein content, 8.7 % in sedimentation volume, 10.8 % in wet gluten content and a reduction of 3.8 g in 1000‐kernel weight compared with FI. EWS and R increased sedimentation volume and wet gluten content, but decreased 1000‐kernel weight compared with FI. The effect of LWS on grain quality was more significant than that of EWS. The results suggest that soil moisture conditions increase grain yield and kernel weight of winter wheat but decrease its quality.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 15
Claim · model-written summary
Continuous water stress decreased winter wheat grain yield by 65.5% compared with the fully irrigated treatment.
- Taxon
- winter wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- continuous water stresse1
- Outcome
- grain yieldse2
- Direction
- decreasede2
- Value
- 65.5e2
- Comparator
- FI treatmente2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“on winter wheat”
e1“fully irrigated (FI), rainfed (R), early water stress (EWS), late water stress (LWS) and continuous water stress (CWS)”
e2“CWS, EWS, R and LWS treatments decreased grain yields by 65.5, 40.6, 30.5 and 24.0 %, respectively, compared with the FI treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Early water stress decreased winter wheat grain yield by 40.6% compared with the fully irrigated treatment.
- Taxon
- winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- early water stresse1
- Outcome
- grain yieldse2
- Direction
- decreasede2
- Value
- 40.6e2
- Comparator
- FI treatmente2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“on winter wheat”
e1“fully irrigated (FI), rainfed (R), early water stress (EWS), late water stress (LWS) and continuous water stress (CWS)”
e2“CWS, EWS, R and LWS treatments decreased grain yields by 65.5, 40.6, 30.5 and 24.0 %, respectively, compared with the FI treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Rainfed winter wheat grain yield decreased by 30.5% compared with the fully irrigated treatment.
- Taxon
- winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- rainfede1
- Outcome
- grain yieldse2
- Direction
- decreasede2
- Value
- 30.5e2
- Comparator
- FI treatmente2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“on winter wheat”
e1“fully irrigated (FI), rainfed (R), early water stress (EWS), late water stress (LWS) and continuous water stress (CWS)”
e2“CWS, EWS, R and LWS treatments decreased grain yields by 65.5, 40.6, 30.5 and 24.0 %, respectively, compared with the FI treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Late water stress decreased winter wheat grain yield by 24.0% compared with the fully irrigated treatment.
- Taxon
- winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- late water stresse1
- Outcome
- grain yieldse2
- Direction
- decreasede2
- Value
- 24.0 %e2
- Comparator
- FI treatmente2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“on winter wheat”
e1“fully irrigated (FI), rainfed (R), early water stress (EWS), late water stress (LWS) and continuous water stress (CWS)”
e2“CWS, EWS, R and LWS treatments decreased grain yields by 65.5, 40.6, 30.5 and 24.0 %, respectively, compared with the FI treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Continuous water stress increased winter wheat grain protein content by 18.1% compared with the fully irrigated treatment.
- Taxon
- winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- CWSe3
- Outcome
- grain protein contente3
- Direction
- increasede3
- Value
- 18.1 %e3
- Comparator
- FI treatmente3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“on winter wheat”
e3“CWS increased grain protein content by 18.1 %, sedimentation volume by 16.5 %, wet gluten content by 21.9 % and decreased 1000‐kernel weight by 7.5 g compared with FI treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Continuous water stress increased winter wheat sedimentation volume by 16.5% compared with the fully irrigated treatment.
- Taxon
- winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- CWSe3
- Outcome
- sedimentation volumee3
- Direction
- increasede3
- Value
- 16.5 %e3
- Comparator
- FI treatmente3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“on winter wheat”
e3“CWS increased grain protein content by 18.1 %, sedimentation volume by 16.5 %, wet gluten content by 21.9 % and decreased 1000‐kernel weight by 7.5 g compared with FI treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Continuous water stress increased winter wheat wet gluten content by 21.9% compared with the fully irrigated treatment.
- Taxon
- winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- CWSe3
- Outcome
- wet gluten contente3
- Direction
- increasede3
- Value
- 21.9 %e3
- Comparator
- FI treatmente3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“on winter wheat”
e3“CWS increased grain protein content by 18.1 %, sedimentation volume by 16.5 %, wet gluten content by 21.9 % and decreased 1000‐kernel weight by 7.5 g compared with FI treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Continuous water stress decreased winter wheat kernel weight by 7.5 g compared with the fully irrigated treatment.
- Taxon
- winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- CWSe3
- Outcome
- kernel weighte3
- Direction
- decreasede3
- Value
- 7.5 ge3
- Comparator
- FI treatmente3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“on winter wheat”
e3“CWS increased grain protein content by 18.1 %, sedimentation volume by 16.5 %, wet gluten content by 21.9 % and decreased 1000‐kernel weight by 7.5 g compared with FI treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Late water stress increased winter wheat grain protein content by 8.3% compared with the fully irrigated treatment.
- Taxon
- winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- LWSe4
- Outcome
- grain protein contente4
- Direction
- increasee4
- Value
- 8.3 %e4
- Comparator
- FIe4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“on winter wheat”
e4“LWS caused an increase of 8.3 % in grain protein content, 8.7 % in sedimentation volume, 10.8 % in wet gluten content and a reduction of 3.8 g in 1000‐kernel weight compared with FI”
Claim · model-written summary
Late water stress increased winter wheat sedimentation volume by 8.7% compared with the fully irrigated treatment.
- Taxon
- winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- LWSe4
- Outcome
- sedimentation volumee4
- Direction
- increasee4
- Value
- 8.7 %e4
- Comparator
- FIe4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“on winter wheat”
e4“LWS caused an increase of 8.3 % in grain protein content, 8.7 % in sedimentation volume, 10.8 % in wet gluten content and a reduction of 3.8 g in 1000‐kernel weight compared with FI”
Claim · model-written summary
Late water stress increased winter wheat wet gluten content by 10.8% compared with the fully irrigated treatment.
- Taxon
- winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- LWSe4
- Outcome
- wet gluten contente4
- Direction
- increasee4
- Value
- 10.8 %e4
- Comparator
- FIe4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“on winter wheat”
e4“LWS caused an increase of 8.3 % in grain protein content, 8.7 % in sedimentation volume, 10.8 % in wet gluten content and a reduction of 3.8 g in 1000‐kernel weight compared with FI”
Claim · model-written summary
Late water stress decreased winter wheat kernel weight by 3.8 g compared with the fully irrigated treatment.
- Taxon
- winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- LWSe4
- Outcome
- kernel weighte4
- Direction
- reductione4
- Value
- 3.8 ge4
- Comparator
- FIe4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“on winter wheat”
e4“LWS caused an increase of 8.3 % in grain protein content, 8.7 % in sedimentation volume, 10.8 % in wet gluten content and a reduction of 3.8 g in 1000‐kernel weight compared with FI”
Claim · model-written summary
The effect of late water stress on grain quality was more significant than that of early water stress.
- Taxon
- winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- LWSe6
- Outcome
- grain qualitye6
- Direction
- more significante6
- Comparator
- EWSe6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“on winter wheat”
e6“The effect of LWS on grain quality was more significant than that of EWS”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil moisture conditions increase grain yield and kernel weight of winter wheat.
- Taxon
- winter wheatTriticum aestivume7
- Treatment
- soil moisture conditionse7
- Outcome
- grain yield and kernel weighte7
- Direction
- increasee7
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e7“soil moisture conditions increase grain yield and kernel weight of winter wheat but decrease its quality”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil moisture conditions decrease the quality of winter wheat grain.
- Taxon
- winter wheatTriticum aestivume7
- Treatment
- soil moisture conditionse7
- Outcome
- qualitye7
- Direction
- decreasee7
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e7“soil moisture conditions increase grain yield and kernel weight of winter wheat but decrease its quality”
The same questions in other papers
rainfall · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
77 papers more in this group
See all 81 papers →drought · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
536 papers in the same direction as this paper · 95 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
628 papers more in this group
See all 632 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.