Paper · 2014

Physiological-based Selection Criteria for Terminal Drought in Wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)

A Koocheki; A Yazdansepas; U. Mahmadyorov; et al.

7
claims
18
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Drought is the most restricting factor in agricultural production in arid and semi-arid regions. This research was conducted on 19 facultative and winter wheat genotypes grown under normal irrigation (N), early post-anthesis (S1), and late post-anthesis (S 2) drought stress conditions. The experiments were conducted at Karadj, Arak, and Jolgehrokh Agricultural Research Stations in Iran, during 2008 -11 cropping seasons. Stress reduced grain number per spike, thousand grain weight, grain weight per spike, harvest index, biological weight, and grain yield. Effect of environment, irrigation, and genotype on most of the traits, including grain yield, was significant. Remobilization, efficiency of remobilization, and pre-anthesis photo-assimilate contribution to grain filling increased under drought stress condition. Correlation coefficients between those traits and grain yield were significantly positive under N, S 1, and S 2 conditions. Based on different drought tolerance indices, the improved line Alvd//Aldan/Ias58*2/3/Gaspard was identified as the most tolerant genotype under anthesis and post-anthesis drought stress conditions. It also had the highest remobilization, efficiency of remobilization, and preanthesis photo-assimilate contribution to grain filling under drought stress conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress reduced grain number per spike, thousand grain weight and grain weight per spike compared with normal irrigation.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
grain number per spike, thousand grain weight, grain weight per spikee1
Direction
reducede1
Comparator
normal irrigation (N)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Physiological-based Selection Criteria for Terminal Drought in Wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–92 · show in text ↑
e0

“This research was conducted on 19 facultative and winter wheat genotypes grown under normal irrigation (N), early post-anthesis (S1), and late post-anthesis (S 2) drought stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 97–285 · show in text ↑
e1

“Stress reduced grain number per spike, thousand grain weight, grain weight per spike, harvest index, biological weight, and grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 424–559 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress reduced harvest index, biological weight and grain yield compared with normal irrigation.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
harvest index, biological weight, and grain yielde1
Direction
reducede1
Comparator
normal irrigation (N)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Physiological-based Selection Criteria for Terminal Drought in Wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–92 · show in text ↑
e0

“This research was conducted on 19 facultative and winter wheat genotypes grown under normal irrigation (N), early post-anthesis (S1), and late post-anthesis (S 2) drought stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 97–285 · show in text ↑
e1

“Stress reduced grain number per spike, thousand grain weight, grain weight per spike, harvest index, biological weight, and grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 424–559 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Environment, irrigation and genotype significantly affected most traits, including grain yield.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
grain yielde2
Qualifier
Effect of environment, irrigation, and genotype on most of the traitse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Physiological-based Selection Criteria for Terminal Drought in Wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–92 · show in text ↑
e2

“Effect of environment, irrigation, and genotype on most of the traits, including grain yield, was significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–670 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Remobilization, remobilization efficiency and pre-anthesis photo-assimilate contribution to grain filling increased under drought stress.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
drought stress conditione3
Outcome
Remobilization, efficiency of remobilization, and pre-anthesis photo-assimilate contribution to grain fillinge3
Direction
increasede3
Comparator
normal irrigation (N)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Physiological-based Selection Criteria for Terminal Drought in Wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–92 · show in text ↑
e0

“This research was conducted on 19 facultative and winter wheat genotypes grown under normal irrigation (N), early post-anthesis (S1), and late post-anthesis (S 2) drought stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 97–285 · show in text ↑
e3

“Remobilization, efficiency of remobilization, and pre-anthesis photo-assimilate contribution to grain filling increased under drought stress condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–822 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Correlation coefficients between the remobilization traits and grain yield were significantly positive under N, S1 and S2 conditions.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
N, S 1, and S 2 conditionse4
Outcome
Correlation coefficients between those traits and grain yielde4
Direction
positivee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Physiological-based Selection Criteria for Terminal Drought in Wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–92 · show in text ↑
e4

“Correlation coefficients between those traits and grain yield were significantly positive under N, S 1, and S 2 conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–946 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The improved line Alvd//Aldan/Ias58*2/3/Gaspard was the most tolerant genotype under anthesis and post-anthesis drought.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Alvd//Aldan/Ias58*2/3/Gasparde5
Outcome
most tolerant genotypee5
Qualifier
under anthesis and post-anthesis drought stress conditionse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Physiological-based Selection Criteria for Terminal Drought in Wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–92 · show in text ↑
e5

“the improved line Alvd//Aldan/Ias58*2/3/Gaspard was identified as the most tolerant genotype under anthesis and post-anthesis drought stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 994–1145 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same line had the highest remobilization, remobilization efficiency and pre-anthesis photo-assimilate contribution under drought stress.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Alvd//Aldan/Ias58*2/3/Gasparde5
Outcome
remobilization, efficiency of remobilization, and preanthesis photo-assimilate contribution to grain fillinge6
Qualifier
under drought stress conditionse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Physiological-based Selection Criteria for Terminal Drought in Wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–92 · show in text ↑
e5

“the improved line Alvd//Aldan/Ias58*2/3/Gaspard was identified as the most tolerant genotype under anthesis and post-anthesis drought stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 994–1145 · show in text ↑
e6

“It also had the highest remobilization, efficiency of remobilization, and preanthesis photo-assimilate contribution to grain filling under drought stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1311 · show in text ↑

drought · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

632 papers: 95 positive, 537 negative or no effect

94 papers in the same direction as this paper · 537 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

628 papers more in this group

See all 632 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.