Paper · 1988 · Australian Journal of Agricultural Research

Comparison of the effects of continuous and relieved water stress on nitrogen nutrition of grain sorghum

TJ Rego; NJ Grundon; CJ Asher; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
8
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A solution culture experiment was conducted to study the effects of continuous and relieved water stress and of nitrogen (N) supply on growth and N content of grain sorghum cv. Texas 610SR. Polyethylene glycol-6000 was used to impose solution osmotic potentials of -0.1, -0.4, and -1.1 MPa over 9 days beginning on day 21. On day 30, half the plants in the -0.4 and -1.1 MPa treatments were returned to solutions with osmotic potentials of -0.1 MPa (relieved water stress regime), while the other half remained at solution osmotic potentials of -0.4 and -1.1 MPa until harvest (continuous water stress regime). Plants were harvested on day 43. Dry matter yields, total plant N content, mean rate of N uptake per unit root weight, and the number of leaves expanded after imposition of solution osmotic potential treatments were decreased significantly by decreases in N supply and solution osmotic potential in the continuous water stress regime. Decreasing the solution osmotic potential in the continuous water stress regime had no effect on mean N concentrations in expanded leaves or in shoots, but increased N concentrations in roots and in stem plus immature leaves. Plants in the relieved water stress regime produced more dry matter, expanded more leaves after day 21, had higher N contents, N concentrations and mean N uptake rates per unit root weight than plants in the continuous stress regime at equivalent levels of solution osmotic potential. Relationships between leaf N concentrations and relative yield of shoots were non-asymptotic for all three index leaves (youngest emerged blade and the two blades immediately below), and this prevented the calculation of meaningful critical N concentrations in any treatment. The results are discussed in relation to effects of intermittent water stress on rainfed sorghum in the field.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower nitrogen supply and osmotic potential significantly decreased sorghum dry matter yield, total nitrogen, uptake rate, and leaf expansion under continuous stress.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
decreases in N supply and solution osmotic potentiale0
Outcome
Dry matter yields, total plant N content, mean rate of N uptake per unit root weighte0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
continuous water stress regimee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dry matter yields, total plant N content, mean rate of N uptake per unit root weight, and the number of leaves expanded after imposition of solution osmotic potential treatments were decreased significantly by decreases in N supply and solution osmotic potential in the continuous water stress regime.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 644–945 · show in text ↑
t0

“grain sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower osmotic potential did not change nitrogen concentrations in expanded leaves or shoots during continuous stress.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
Decreasing the solution osmotic potentiale0
Outcome
mean N concentrations in expanded leaves or in shootse0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Decreasing the solution osmotic potential in the continuous water stress regime had no effect on mean N concentrations in expanded leaves or in shoots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1096 · show in text ↑
t0

“grain sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower osmotic potential increased root and stem plus immature-leaf nitrogen concentrations during continuous stress.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
Decreasing the solution osmotic potentiale0
Outcome
N concentrations in roots and in stem plus immature leavese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Decreasing the solution osmotic potential in the continuous water stress regime had no effect on mean N concentrations in expanded leaves or in shoots, but increased N concentrations in roots and in stem plus immature leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1171 · show in text ↑
t0

“grain sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relieved stress increased dry matter, leaf expansion, nitrogen content, nitrogen concentration, and nitrogen uptake rate relative to continuous stress.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
relieved water stress regimee0
Outcome
dry matter, expanded more leaves after day 21, had higher N contentse0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
continuous stress regimee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants in the relieved water stress regime produced more dry matter, expanded more leaves after day 21, had higher N contents, N concentrations and mean N uptake rates per unit root weight than plants in the continuous stress regime at equivalent levels of solution osmotic potential.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1172–1456 · show in text ↑
t0

“grain sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–104 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf nitrogen concentration versus relative shoot yield relationships were non-asymptotic in all three index leaves, preventing critical nitrogen estimates.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolort0
Organ / stage
index leavese0
Outcome
Relationships between leaf N concentrations and relative yield of shootse0
Direction
non-asymptotice0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Relationships between leaf N concentrations and relative yield of shoots were non-asymptotic for all three index leaves (youngest emerged blade and the two blades immediately below), and this prevented the calculation of meaningful critical N concentrations in any treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1457–1732 · show in text ↑
t0

“grain sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–104 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Results differ

100 papers: 80 positive, 20 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 80 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

96 papers more in this group

See all 100 papers →

drought · growth · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 5 positive, 24 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.