Paper · 1995 · The Rangeland Journal

Spatial and Temporal Pattern in the Grazing of Grasses by Sheep Within a Semi-Arid Wooded Landscape.

KC Hodgkinson; JW Terpstra; WJ Muller

10
claims
17
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Grazing the woodlands of semi-arid and arid Australia by domestic stock has extensively collapsed perennial *grass populations and thereby fostered woody plant increase. This study examined the pattern of grazing of individual grass plants by sheep in the landscape of a semi-arid woodland, and a model was developed describing the spatial and temporal influences on the grazing pressure placed on plants. Plants of two widespread perennial grass species differing in palatability, Eragrostis eriopoda and Thyridolepis mitchelliana, were examined weekly in two contrasting periods at the CSIRO Lake Mere Research Facility. The plants were located throughout the landscape in lightly- and heavily- stocked paddocks. Patterns of grazing in space and time were determined by examining the grazing of marked tillers. No preference was shown for previously ungrazed plants and only occasionally were previously grazed plants preferred. Thyridolepis mitchelliana plants were slightly preferred over E. eriopoda plants. Landscape zones receiving water and nutrients from elsewhere were preferred for grazing but the effect was weak. The foliage biomass of herbaceous plants in the immediate vicinity of a grass plant did not influence the number of tillers grazed nor the probability of the plant being grazed. Overall the defoliation of individual plants by sheep was weakly determined by landscape location, stocking level, plant species and prevailing forage on offer. The influence of spatial and temporal variation was small; random grazing of grass plants was the rule. This finding suggests that the grazing pressure on palatable perennial grasses in the paddocks of semi-arid woodlands will be similar across wooded landscapes and that spatial variability in plant mortality could be due to. the combined effect of plant water stress, which varies spatially and temporally, and grazing pressure which varies temporally but not spatially.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sheep showed no preference for previously ungrazed grass plants.

Taxon
Grassest0
Interactor
SheepOvis ariest0herbivore
Outcome
previously ungrazed plantse1
Direction
No preferencee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ovis aries
Ovis aries · InteractorAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grazing of Grasses by Sheep”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–63 · show in text ↑
e1

“No preference was shown for previously ungrazed plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–867 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Previously grazed grass plants were only occasionally preferred by sheep.

Taxon
Grassest0
Interactor
SheepOvis ariest0herbivore
Outcome
previously grazed plantse2
Direction
only occasionallye2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ovis aries
Ovis aries · InteractorAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grazing of Grasses by Sheep”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–63 · show in text ↑
e2

“only occasionally were previously grazed plants preferred”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–929 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thyridolepis mitchelliana plants were slightly preferred over E. eriopoda plants.

Taxon
Thyridolepis mitchellianaThyridolepis mitchellianae3
Outcome
preferrede3
Direction
slightly preferrede3
Comparator
E. eriopoda plantse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Thyridolepis mitchelliana
Thyridolepis mitchelliana · TaxonKevin Thiele from Perth, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Thyridolepis mitchelliana plants were slightly preferred over E. eriopoda plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 931–1011 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Landscape zones receiving water and nutrients from elsewhere were preferred for grazing, but the effect was weak.

Taxon
Grassest0
Interactor
SheepOvis ariest0herbivore
Outcome
grazinge4
Direction
were preferrede4
Qualifier
the effect was weake4
Setting
Landscape zones receiving water and nutrients from elsewheree4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ovis aries
Ovis aries · InteractorAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grazing of Grasses by Sheep”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–63 · show in text ↑
e4

“Landscape zones receiving water and nutrients from elsewhere were preferred for grazing but the effect was weak”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1124 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliage biomass of herbaceous plants near a grass plant did not influence the number of tillers grazed or the probability of the plant being grazed.

Taxon
Grassest0
Treatment
foliage biomass of herbaceous plantse5
Interactor
SheepOvis ariest0herbivore
Outcome
number of tillers grazede5
Direction
did not influencee5
Qualifier
nor the probability of the plant being grazede5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ovis aries
Ovis aries · InteractorAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grazing of Grasses by Sheep”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–63 · show in text ↑
e5

“The foliage biomass of herbaceous plants in the immediate vicinity of a grass plant did not influence the number of tillers grazed nor the probability of the plant being grazed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1302 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Defoliation of individual grass plants by sheep was weakly determined by landscape location, stocking level, plant species and prevailing forage.

Taxon
Grassest0
Interactor
sheepOvis ariese6herbivore
Outcome
defoliation of individual plants by sheepe6
Qualifier
weakly determined by landscape location, stocking level, plant species and prevailing forage on offere6

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ovis aries
Ovis aries · InteractorAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grazing of Grasses by Sheep”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–63 · show in text ↑
e6

“Overall the defoliation of individual plants by sheep was weakly determined by landscape location, stocking level, plant species and prevailing forage on offer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1304–1463 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The influence of spatial and temporal variation on grazing was small.

Taxon
Grassest0
Outcome
The influence of spatial and temporal variatione7
Qualifier
was smalle7

Verbatim

t0

“Grazing of Grasses by Sheep”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–63 · show in text ↑
e7

“The influence of spatial and temporal variation was small”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1465–1522 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grazing of grass plants was random, the rule rather than an exception.

Taxon
grass plantse0
Outcome
random grazinge0

Verbatim

e0

“random grazing of grass plants was the rule”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1524–1567 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Grazing pressure on palatable perennial grasses in semi-arid woodland paddocks is suggested to be similar across wooded landscapes.

Taxon
palatable perennial grassese0
Outcome
grazing pressuree0
Qualifier
will be similar across wooded landscapese0

Verbatim

e0

“the grazing pressure on palatable perennial grasses in the paddocks of semi-arid woodlands will be similar across wooded landscapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1596–1727 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Spatial variability in plant mortality could be due to the combined effect of plant water stress and grazing pressure.

Taxon
Grassest0
Outcome
spatial variability in plant mortalitye1
Qualifier
the combined effect of plant water stresse1

Verbatim

t0

“Grazing of Grasses by Sheep”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–63 · show in text ↑
e1

“spatial variability in plant mortality could be due to. the combined effect of plant water stress, which varies spatially and temporally, and grazing pressure which varies temporally but not spatially”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1737–1937 · show in text ↑