Abstract
Virginia market‐type peanut cultivars in North Carolina vary in the number of days following emergence required to reach optimum maturity, and concern over cultivar response to interactions of tobacco thrips ( Frankliniella fusca Hinds) damage in absence of in‐furrow insecticide and injury from paraquat exist with respect to cultivar selection. Experiments were conducted during 2007 and 2008 to determine if cultivars vary in response to interactions of the insecticide aldicarb (no aldicarb or aldicarb applied in the seed furrow at planting) and the herbicide paraquat (no paraquat or paraquat applied 24 to 28 d after peanut emergence, DAE). The cultivar VA 98R expressed more damage from tobacco thrips than the cultivars Gregory, Perry, or Phillips. Although vegetative growth parameters varied among cultivar, aldicarb, and paraquat treatments, pod yield and market grade characteristics were not affected by the interaction of experiment, cultivar, aldicarb, and paraquat or the interaction of cultivar, aldicarb, and paraquat. Damage from tobacco thrips in absence of aldicarb affected pod yield more than injury from paraquat. The combination of tobacco thrips damage in absence of aldicarb and injury from paraquat lowered pod yield compared with aldicarb‐treated peanut either with or without paraquat regardless of cultivar. These data suggest that recommendations on use of aldicarb for tobacco thrips control or paraquat for early season weed control should not vary based on cultivar selection when considering pod yield and market grade characteristics.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
VA 98R had more tobacco-thrips damage than Gregory, Perry or Phillips.
- Taxon
- peanut
Arachis hypogaeat0 - Material
- VA 98Re0
- Interactor
- tobacco thripse0pest
- Outcome
- damage from tobacco thripse0
- Direction
- moree0
- Comparator
- Gregory, Perry, or Phillipse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The cultivar VA 98R expressed more damage from tobacco thrips than the cultivars Gregory, Perry, or Phillips”
t0“Peanut”
Claim · model-written summary
Vegetative growth parameters varied among cultivar, aldicarb and paraquat treatments.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- aldicarb, and paraquat treatmentse0
- Outcome
- vegetative growth parameterse0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“vegetative growth parameters varied among cultivar, aldicarb, and paraquat treatments”
t0“Peanut”
Claim · model-written summary
Pod yield was not affected by experiment-by-cultivar-by-aldicarb-by-paraquat or cultivar-by-aldicarb-by-paraquat interactions.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Outcome
- pod yielde0
- Direction
- not affectede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“pod yield and market grade characteristics were not affected by the interaction of experiment, cultivar, aldicarb, and paraquat or the interaction of cultivar, aldicarb, and paraquat”
t0“Peanut”
Claim · model-written summary
Market grade was not affected by the stated cultivar, aldicarb and paraquat interactions.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Outcome
- market grade characteristicse0
- Direction
- not affectede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“pod yield and market grade characteristics were not affected by the interaction of experiment, cultivar, aldicarb, and paraquat or the interaction of cultivar, aldicarb, and paraquat”
t0“Peanut”
Claim · model-written summary
Thrips damage without aldicarb affected pod yield more than paraquat injury.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- absence of aldicarbe0
- Interactor
- tobacco thripse0pest
- Outcome
- pod yielde0
- Direction
- moree0
- Comparator
- injury from paraquate0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Damage from tobacco thrips in absence of aldicarb affected pod yield more than injury from paraquat”
t0“Peanut”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined thrips damage without aldicarb and paraquat injury lowered pod yield relative to aldicarb-treated peanut regardless of cultivar.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae0
- Treatment
- tobacco thrips damage in absence of aldicarb and injury from paraquate0
- Interactor
- tobacco thripse0pest
- Outcome
- pod yielde0
- Direction
- lowerede0
- Qualifier
- regardless of cultivare0
- Comparator
- aldicarb‐treated peanut either with or without paraquate0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The combination of tobacco thrips damage in absence of aldicarb and injury from paraquat lowered pod yield compared with aldicarb‐treated peanut either with or without paraquat regardless of cultivar”
Claim · model-written summary
Aldicarb and paraquat recommendations based on pod yield and market grade should not vary by cultivar.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Interactor
- tobacco thripse0pest
- Outcome
- recommendations on use of aldicarb for tobacco thrips control or paraquat for early season weed control should not vary based on cultivar selectione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“recommendations on use of aldicarb for tobacco thrips control or paraquat for early season weed control should not vary based on cultivar selection when considering pod yield and market grade characteristics”
t0“Peanut”
The same questions in other papers
aldicarb · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- negative
19 papers more in this group
See all 23 papers →Nicotiana tabacum · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
paraquat · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- positive
16 papers more in this group
See all 20 papers →Thrips · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- negative
- negative
- no effect
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.