aldicarb · Yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)

Results differ23 papers: 19 positive, 4 negative or no effect · 22 pairs of papers confirmed to differ

28 claims from these papers; 8 citations between them.

Papers whose results differ, checked claim by claim 22

22 pairs of papers on this question report results that differ: an effect in one paper, the opposite effect or no effect in the other. Two model reviewers reading both claims accepted each pair.

Show 16 more pairs

How these papers cite each other

8 citations between these papers: 3 on the same side, 5 across the two sides.

Positive resultNegative result or no effect198019851990199520002005201020152020
  • Positive result
  • Negative result or no effect
  • Citation, pointing to the cited paper
  • Citation across the two sides
  • Larger circle: more citations overall

Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.

Papers reporting a positive result 19

  1. Research Papers: Relation Between the Method of Incorporation of Systemic Nematicides into Soil and their Effectiveness against Root-Knot Nematode on Peanuts · 1979

  2. Distribution and control of root-knot and root lesion nematodes on peanuts in north Queensland · 1981

  3. Combinations of 1,3-D and Aldicarb for Management of Meloidogyne arenaria in Peanuts · 1985

  4. Peanut-Cotton Rotations for the Management of Meloidogyne arenaria. · 1987

    cited by 2 papers here

  5. Crops Uncommon to Alabama for the Management of Meloidogyne arenaria in Peanut. · 1989

    cited by 1 paper here

  6. Soybean-Peanut Rotations for the Management of Meloidogyne arenaria and Sclerotium rolfsii · 1991

  7. Effects of Two Cropping and Two Tillage Systems and Pesticides on Peanut Pest Management1 · 1991

  8. Rotations of Bahiagrass and Castorbean with Peanut for the Management of Meloidogyne arenaria. · 1991

    cites 2 papers here

  9. Cotton as a Rotation Crop for the Management of Meloidogyne arenaria and Sclerotium rolfsii in Peanut. · 1991

  10. Effect of Harvest Date on Termite Damage, yield, and Aflatoxin Contamination in groundnut in Burkino Faso · 1991

  11. Effects of Partridge Pea-Peanut Rotations on Populations of Meloidogyne arenaria, Incidence of Sclerotium rolfsii, and Yield of Peanut · 1995

  12. Thrips Injury Can Reduce Peanut Yield and Quality under Conditions of multiple Stress · 1998

    cited by 2 papers here

  13. Managing Nematodes, Fungal Diseases, and Thrips on Peanut with Pesticides and Crop Rotations of Bahiagrass, Corn, and Cotton1 · 1999

    cited by 1 paper here

  14. Timing of Aldicarb Applications to Control Meloidogyne arenaria in Peanut1 · 2001

  15. Role of Insecticides in Reducing Thrips Injury to Plants and Incidence of Tomato Spotted Wilt Virus in Virginia Market-Type Peanut · 2007

    cited by 1 paper here

  16. Role of Insecticides in Reducing Thrips Injury to Plants and Incidence of Tomato Spotted Wilt Virus in Virginia Market-Type Peanut · 2007

  17. 国家“水专项”研究课题——城市污水再生利用及水质安全保障 · 2010

  18. Etiology of Peanut Pod Rot in Nicaragua: I. The Effect of Pod Size, Calcium, Fungicide, and Nematicide · 2010

  19. Performance of Imidacloprid or Phorate Co-Applied In-Furrow with Superabsorbent Polymer and Evaluation of Aldicarb · 2023

Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 4

  1. Evaluation of Trichoderma spp., Fungicides, and Chemical Combinations for Control of Southern Stem Rot on Peanuts1 · 1983

  2. Rotations with Coastal Bermudagrass, Cotton, and Bahiagrass for Management of Meloidogyne arenaria and Southern Blight in Peanut. · 1994

    cites 1 paper here

  3. Factors Influencing Response of Virginia Market Type Peanut (Arachis hypogaea) to Paraquat under Weed-Free Conditions · 2009

    cites 2 papers herecited by 1 paper here

  4. Peanut Cultivar Response to Damage from Tobacco Thrips and Paraquat · 2009

    cites 3 papers here

A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.

aldicarb on Arachis hypogaea (peanut) against other targets

aldicarb · yield on other organisms