Paper · 1986 · Experimental Agriculture

Manure for Cropping: A Case Study from Central Nigeria

J. Mark Powell

4
claims
5
verbatim quotes
40
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SUMMARY The traditional management of cattle manure in a cropping system in the savanna zone of central Nigeria is discussed in conjunction with the agronomic benefits and problems of manure use. Nitrogen and phosphorus contents of the manure varied seasonally. On-farm trials showed that maize grain yields were about 1 t ha −1 more and weed growth 90% greater in manured than in non-manured areas. It is important to reduce the competition between crops and weeds if grain crops are to obtain the full benefit of manure in such cropping systems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure nitrogen and phosphorus contents varied seasonally.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Outcome
Nitrogen and phosphorus contents of the manuree0
Direction
varied seasonallye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen and phosphorus contents of the manure varied seasonally.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 196–261 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize grain yields were about 1 t ha −1 more and weed growth 90% greater in manured than in non-manured areas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 289–398 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manured areas had about 1 t ha −1 more maize grain yield than non-manured areas.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
manurede0
Outcome
maize grain yieldse0
Direction
moree0
Value
1 t ha −1e0
Comparator
non-manured arease0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maize grain yields were about 1 t ha −1 more and weed growth 90% greater in manured than in non-manured areas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 289–398 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed growth was 90% greater in manured areas than non-manured areas.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
manurede0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed growthe0
Direction
greatere0
Value
90%e0
Comparator
non-manured arease0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maize grain yields were about 1 t ha −1 more and weed growth 90% greater in manured than in non-manured areas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 289–398 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend reducing crop–weed competition to gain the full grain-crop benefit of manure.

Taxon
grain cropse0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
reduce the competition between crops and weedse0

Verbatim

e0

“It is important to reduce the competition between crops and weeds if grain crops are to obtain the full benefit of manure in such cropping systems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 400–547 · show in text ↑

fertilization · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

62 papers: 34 positive, 28 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

58 papers more in this group

See all 62 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.