Paper · 1994 · FEMS Microbiology Ecology

Effect of a genetically modified Pseudomonas aureofaciens on indigenous microbial populations of wheat

Frans A.A.M. Leij; Emma J. Sutton; John M. Whipps; et al.

4
claims
6
verbatim quotes
40
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

An isolate of Pseudomonas aureofaciens from the phylloplane of sugar beet which was chromosomally modified for monitoring purposes by the insertion of two gene cassettes (kmr-xylE and lacZY) was introduced to the phytosphere of spring wheat in a number of experiments and the resulting microbial perturbations quantified. Such studies involving innocuous bacterial isolates can serve as a guide in the assessment of risk associated with the release of functionally modified microorganisms. Introductions of P. aureofaciens on seeds caused large microbial perturbations (up to 2 log units) at the seedling stage on seeds and roots. As the inoculated plants matured (tillering, flowering and ripening), perturbations of total microbial populations were found to be non-significant. Microbial perturbation on maturing wheat roots as a result of seed inoculations with P. aureofaciens could only be detected using more sensitive monitoring procedures describing the Pseudomonas community in terms of colony appearance rate on a selective Pseudomonas medium. Spray applications of the marked P. aureofaciens isolate onto the leaf surface of wheat caused no significant perturbations of the indigenous microbial populations present on the phylloplane.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed introduction caused microbial perturbations up to 2 log units on seedling seeds and roots.

Organ / stage
seedling stage on seeds and rootse0
Treatment
Introductions of P. aureofaciens on seedse0
Interactor
P. aureofaciensPseudomonas chlororaphis subsp. aureofaciense0symbiont
Outcome
microbial perturbationse0
Direction
largee0
Value
up to 2 log unitse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Introductions of P. aureofaciens on seeds caused large microbial perturbations (up to 2 log units) at the seedling stage on seeds and roots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 490–630 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–102 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Total microbial perturbations were nonsignificant as inoculated wheat matured.

Organ / stage
tillering, flowering and ripeninge0
Outcome
perturbations of total microbial populationse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“As the inoculated plants matured (tillering, flowering and ripening), perturbations of total microbial populations were found to be non-significant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–779 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–102 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sensitive monitoring detected microbial perturbation on maturing wheat roots after seed inoculation.

Treatment
seed inoculations with P. aureofaciense0
Interactor
P. aureofaciensPseudomonas chlororaphis subsp. aureofaciense0symbiont
Outcome
Microbial perturbation on maturing wheat rootse0
Comparator
more sensitive monitoring procedurese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Microbial perturbation on maturing wheat roots as a result of seed inoculations with P. aureofaciens could only be detected using more sensitive monitoring procedures describing the Pseudomonas community in terms of colony appearance rate on a selective Pseudomonas medium.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–1053 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf spray application caused no significant perturbation of indigenous phylloplane microbes.

Treatment
Spray applications of the marked P. aureofaciens isolatee0
Interactor
P. aureofaciensPseudomonas chlororaphis subsp. aureofaciense0symbiont
Outcome
perturbations of the indigenous microbial populationse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spray applications of the marked P. aureofaciens isolate onto the leaf surface of wheat caused no significant perturbations of the indigenous microbial populations present on the phylloplane.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1054–1245 · show in text ↑

application · soil: biology · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 19 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.