Paper · 2005 · Physiologia Plantarum

Ecophysiological and morphological parameters related to survival in grass species exposed to an extreme climatic event

Ann Milbau; Liesbeth Scheerlinck; Dirk Reheul; et al.

4
claims
7
verbatim quotes
43
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

An experiment was performed to elucidate interspecific differences in survival time of grass species subjected to an extreme climatic event. We exposed eight grass species to a simulated heat wave in the field (‘free air’ temperature increase at 11°C above ambient) combined with drought. We determined whether interspecific differences in survival time were related to the responses of the species to the imposed stress or could be explained by their ecophysiological or morphological characteristics in unstressed conditions. Surprisingly, there was no effect of specific leaf area, but species with a higher total leaf area survived longer. This may arise from a greater water reserve in the plant as a whole, which could delay the desiccation of the meristem, or from reduced evaporation due to a higher leaf area index. Species in which the decrease in light‐saturated stomatal conductance ( g s ) and photosynthetic CO 2 uptake rate ( A max ) was strongly related to the decrease in soil water availability (measured as soil relative water content and stress duration) survived longer than species in which g s and A max likewise declined but responded more to daily fluctuations in irradiance, temperature, and vapor pressure deficit during the heat wave. We, therefore, hypothesize that interspecific differences in stress survival time might be related to the extent to which stomata react to changes in soil water conditions relatively to changes in other environmental and physiological factors. The results suggest that resistance to extremes is governed by other mechanisms than resistance to moderate drought.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Specific leaf area had no effect on grass survival time.

Taxon
grass speciest0
Outcome
specific leaf areae0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedSetting

Verbatim

e0

“there was no effect of specific leaf area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–583 · show in text ↑
t0

“grass species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–82 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grass species with higher total leaf area survived longer.

Taxon
grass speciest0
Organ / stage
total leaf areae0
Outcome
survived longere0
Direction
longere0

Verbatim

e0

“species with a higher total leaf area survived longer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–642 · show in text ↑
t0

“grass species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–82 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Species whose stomatal conductance and photosynthetic uptake tracked declining soil water survived longer than species responding more to daily atmospheric variation.

Taxon
Speciese0
Outcome
survived longere0
Direction
longere0
Comparator
species in which g s and A max likewise declined but responded more to daily fluctuations in irradiance, temperature, and vapor pressure deficite0

Verbatim

e0

“Species in which the decrease in light‐saturated stomatal conductance ( g s ) and photosynthetic CO 2 uptake rate ( A max ) was strongly related to the decrease in soil water availability (measured as soil relative water content and stress duration) survived longer than species in which g s and A max likewise declined but responded more to daily fluctuations in irradiance, temperature, and vapor pressure deficit during the heat wave.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–1262 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors hypothesize that survival differences depend on relative stomatal responsiveness to soil water versus other environmental factors.

Taxon
grass speciest0
Outcome
stress survival timee0
Qualifier
might be relatede0

Verbatim

e0

“interspecific differences in stress survival time might be related to the extent to which stomata react to changes in soil water conditions relatively to changes in other environmental and physiological factors”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1295–1505 · show in text ↑
t0

“grass species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–82 · show in text ↑