Paper · 2008 · Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection

Use of nonpathogenicFusarium oxysporumand rhizobacteria for suppression of Fusarium root and stem rot ofCucumis sativuscaused byFusarium oxysporumf. sp.radicis - cucumerinum

Saman Abeysinghe

6
claims
10
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract In this study, only non-antagonistic, root-colonizing bacterial isolates and non-pathogenic F. oxysporum isolates were evaluated either alone or in combination as biological control agents. Two non-pathogenic F. oxysporum isolates significantly reduced the Fusarium root and stem rot severity compared to the pathogen inoculated controls plants. Although the bacterial isolates did not protect cucumber plants from Fusarium rot when they were applied alone, the bacterial isolates significantly enhanced (p < 0.05) the plant protection when they were used in combination with the non-pathogenic F. oxysporum isolates. Interestingly, one of the non-pathogenic F. oxysporum isolates which did not protect cucumber plants from Fusarium rot when used alone became a biological control agent when combined with either bacterial isolates. Seed bacterization induced significant root development compared to non-bacterized controls indicating positive effect on the plant growth. Addition of excess iron did not affect the plant protection ability of bacteria indicating no involvement of sidereophore-mediated iron competition. These data provide evidence of the importance of the use of the combination of two biological control agents in this system. Keywords: Cucumberbiological controlrhizobacteriaintegrated crop protectionSri Lanka Acknowledgements The author wishes to thank the financial support provided by the University of Ruhuna through the Faculty of Science Research grant (RU/SF/RP/2001/04).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two nonpathogenic Fusarium isolates significantly reduced rot severity versus pathogen-inoculated controls.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse1
Treatment
Two non-pathogenic F. oxysporum isolatese0
Interactor
FusariumFusariume0pathogen
Second interactor
F. oxysporumFusarium oxysporume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
Fusarium root and stem rot severitye0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
pathogen inoculated controls plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium oxysporum
Fusarium oxysporum · Second interactorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two non-pathogenic F. oxysporum isolates significantly reduced the Fusarium root and stem rot severity compared to the pathogen inoculated controls plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 199–354 · show in text ↑
e1

“Although the bacterial isolates did not protect cucumber plants from Fusarium rot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–436 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial isolates alone did not protect cucumber from Fusarium rot.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
bacterial isolatese0
Interactor
FusariumFusariume0pathogen
Outcome
protect cucumber plants from Fusarium rote0
Direction
did not protecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the bacterial isolates did not protect cucumber plants from Fusarium rot when they were applied alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 364–465 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combining bacterial and nonpathogenic Fusarium isolates significantly enhanced plant protection.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse1
Treatment
bacterial isolatese0
Interactor
FusariumFusariume1pathogen
Second interactor
F. oxysporumFusarium oxysporume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
plant protectione0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium oxysporum
Fusarium oxysporum · Second interactorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the bacterial isolates significantly enhanced (p < 0.05) the plant protection when they were used in combination with the non-pathogenic F. oxysporum isolates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 467–625 · show in text ↑
e1

“Although the bacterial isolates did not protect cucumber plants from Fusarium rot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–436 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A nonpathogenic Fusarium isolate became effective when combined with either bacterial isolate.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
combined with either bacterial isolatese0
Interactor
FusariumFusariume0pathogen
Second interactor
F. oxysporumFusarium oxysporume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
protect cucumber plants from Fusarium rote0
Direction
became a biological control agente0
Comparator
used alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium oxysporum
Fusarium oxysporum · Second interactorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“one of the non-pathogenic F. oxysporum isolates which did not protect cucumber plants from Fusarium rot when used alone became a biological control agent when combined with either bacterial isolates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–840 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed bacterization significantly increased root development relative to nonbacterized controls.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse1
Organ / stage
roote0
Treatment
Seed bacterizatione0
Outcome
root developmente0
Direction
inducede0
Comparator
non-bacterized controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed bacterization induced significant root development compared to non-bacterized controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–933 · show in text ↑
e1

“Although the bacterial isolates did not protect cucumber plants from Fusarium rot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–436 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Excess iron did not affect bacterial plant protection.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse1
Treatment
Addition of excess irone0
Outcome
plant protection ability of bacteriae0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Addition of excess iron did not affect the plant protection ability of bacteria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1061 · show in text ↑
e1

“Although the bacterial isolates did not protect cucumber plants from Fusarium rot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–436 · show in text ↑

Fusarium oxysporum · disease · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

inoculation · Fusarium · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.