Paper · 2005 · Functional Plant Biology

Floret development and survival in wheat plants exposed to contrasting photoperiod and radiation environments during stem elongation

Fernanda G. González; Gustavo A. Slafer; Daniel J. Miralles

11
claims
23
verbatim quotes
104
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Wheat breeding has improved yield potential increasing floret survival through higher dry matter partitioning to the spikes during the stem elongation phase (from terminal spikelet initiation to anthesis). We studied survival of floret primodia in different spikelet positions along the spike in relation to dynamics of spike growth, when dynamics of dry matter partitioning to the spike was altered by photoperiod and shading treatments applied during the stem elongation phase. The cultivar Buck Manantial was exposed to (1) NP+0 un-shaded (natural photoperiod and incoming radiation of the growing season), (2) NP+0 shaded (natural photoperiod but only 33% of the incoming radiation), and (3) NP+6 un-shaded (natural photoperiod extended 6 h and natural incoming radiation). Floret survival increased, depending on spikelet position, 1.1–2.5 fold under un-shaded v. shaded treatments (both under NP+0), and 1.3–1.8 fold under NP+0 v. NP+6 treatments (both un-shaded), without any impact of treatments on the total number of initiated floret primordia. The fate of the floret primordia and its final stage at anthesis were associated with duration of floret development within the stem elongation phase (R2 = 82%, P<0.0001). Florets may be classified into three groups: (i) those that were fertile at anthesis under all treatments (mostly the two florets F1 and F2, proximal to the rachis within the spikelet), (ii) those that reached different stages at anthesis, depending on treatment, and that contributed differentially to the number of fertile florets at anthesis (mostly the florets F3, F4 and F5, positioned in the middle of the spikelet), and (iii) those that did not contribute to the number of fertile florets under any treatment (mostly the florets = F6). Degeneration of florets in group (ii) was associated with spike growth at maximum rate, explaining the strong relationship observed between spike dry weight at anthesis and number of fertile florets. However, degeneration of florets in group (iii) seemed to occur before spike growth at maximum rate. Survival of florets positioned in the middle of the spikelets could be improved by increasing spike growth through manipulation of photoperiod sensitivity during stem elongation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Unshaded wheat had 1.1–2.5-fold greater floret survival than shaded wheat.

Treatment
un-shadede0
Outcome
Floret survivale0
Direction
increasede0
Value
1.1–2.5 folde0
Comparator
shadede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Floret survival increased, depending on spikelet position, 1.1–2.5 fold under un-shaded v. shaded treatments (both under NP+0)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–904 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Natural photoperiod gave 1.3–1.8-fold greater floret survival than extended photoperiod.

Treatment
NP+0e0
Outcome
Floret survivale1
Direction
increasede1
Value
1.3–1.8 folde0
Comparator
NP+6e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“1.3–1.8 fold under NP+0 v. NP+6 treatments (both un-shaded)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–969 · show in text ↑
e1

“Floret survival increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–803 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments did not affect the number of initiated floret primordia.

Treatment
treatmentse0
Outcome
total number of initiated floret primordiae0
Direction
without any impacte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“without any impact of treatments on the total number of initiated floret primordia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1053 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–47 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Final floret fate and stage at anthesis were associated with development duration during stem elongation.

Organ / stage
stem elongation phasee0
Outcome
fate of the floret primordia and its final stage at anthesise0
Value
82%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fate of the floret primordia and its final stage at anthesis were associated with duration of floret development within the stem elongation phase (R2 = 82%, P<0.0001)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1055–1225 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–47 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

F1 and F2 florets were fertile at anthesis under all treatments.

Organ / stage
florets F1 and F2e0
Outcome
fertile at anthesis under all treatmentse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“those that were fertile at anthesis under all treatments (mostly the two florets F1 and F2, proximal to the rachis within the spikelet)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1276–1411 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–47 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Middle-position F3–F5 florets reached different anthesis stages by treatment and contributed differentially to fertile-floret number.

Organ / stage
florets F3, F4 and F5e0
Outcome
different stages at anthesise0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“those that reached different stages at anthesis, depending on treatment, and that contributed differentially to the number of fertile florets at anthesis (mostly the florets F3, F4 and F5, positioned in the middle of the spikelet)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1418–1648 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–47 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

F6 florets did not contribute fertile florets under any treatment.

Organ / stage
florets = F6e0
Outcome
did not contribute to the number of fertile florets under any treatmente0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“those that did not contribute to the number of fertile florets under any treatment (mostly the florets = F6)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1660–1768 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–47 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

F3–F5 degeneration coincided with maximum spike growth.

Organ / stage
florets in group (ii)e0
Outcome
Degeneratione0
Qualifier
spike growth at maximum ratee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Degeneration of florets in group (ii) was associated with spike growth at maximum rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1770–1856 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–47 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spike dry weight at anthesis was strongly related to fertile-floret number.

Organ / stage
spikee0
Outcome
number of fertile floretse0
Qualifier
spike dry weight at anthesise0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“strong relationship observed between spike dry weight at anthesis and number of fertile florets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1873–1968 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–47 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

F6 degeneration appeared to precede maximum spike growth.

Outcome
degeneration of florets in group (iii)e0
Qualifier
before spike growth at maximum ratee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“degeneration of florets in group (iii) seemed to occur before spike growth at maximum rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1979–2069 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–47 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose increasing spike growth through photoperiod sensitivity to improve middle-floret survival.

Outcome
increasing spike growth through manipulation of photoperiod sensitivity during stem elongatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Survival of florets positioned in the middle of the spikelets could be improved by increasing spike growth through manipulation of photoperiod sensitivity during stem elongation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2071–2248 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–47 · show in text ↑

nanoparticle · survival · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.