Paper · 1976 · Canadian Journal of Botany

Isolation of peroxidase isozymes from two flax genotypes by column chromatography

M. A. Fieldes; N. Bashour; C. L. Deal; et al.

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
13
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Isolation of the four major peroxidase isozymes (isozymes 1, 2, 3, and 4) of two flax genotypes was achieved by modifying the procedure used by Shannon et al. (1966) for the isolation of horseradish peroxidase isozymes. The net positive and net negative charges of isozymes 1, 2, and 4 were different. Isozyme 3 resembled isozyme 4 in charge but differed in apparent molecular weight. The chromatographic elution profiles of both genotypes were the same. Anionic gel electrophoresis demonstrated that after isolation and repurification, relative mobility differences existed between the corresponding isozymes of the two genotypes for all four isozymes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four major peroxidase isozymes were isolated from two flax genotypes by a modified procedure.

Gene
peroxidase isozymese0
Outcome
Isolation of the four major peroxidase isozymese0
Value
foure0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Isolation of the four major peroxidase isozymes (isozymes 1, 2, 3, and 4) of two flax genotypes was achieved by modifying the procedure used by Shannon et al. (1966) for the isolation of horseradish peroxidase isozymes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–219 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Isozymes 1, 2, and 4 differed in net charge.

Gene
isozymes 1, 2, and 4e0
Outcome
net positive and net negative chargese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The net positive and net negative charges of isozymes 1, 2, and 4 were different.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 220–301 · show in text ↑
t0

“flax genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–56 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Isozyme 3 resembled isozyme 4 in charge but differed in apparent molecular weight.

Gene
Isozyme 3e0
Outcome
charge but differed in apparent molecular weighte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Isozyme 3 resembled isozyme 4 in charge but differed in apparent molecular weight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 302–384 · show in text ↑
t0

“flax genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–56 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chromatographic elution profiles were the same for both flax genotypes.

Outcome
chromatographic elution profilese0
Direction
samee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The chromatographic elution profiles of both genotypes were the same.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 385–454 · show in text ↑
t0

“flax genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–56 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corresponding isozymes of the two flax genotypes differed in relative mobility after isolation and repurification.

Gene
isozymese0
Outcome
relative mobility differencese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Anionic gel electrophoresis demonstrated that after isolation and repurification, relative mobility differences existed between the corresponding isozymes of the two genotypes for all four isozymes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 455–653 · show in text ↑
t0

“flax genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–56 · show in text ↑