Paper · 2008 · Canadian Journal of Plant Science

The effect of cultivar and applied nitrogen on the performance of Camelina sativa L. in the Maritime Provinces of Canada

S. D. Urbaniak; C. D. Caldwell; V. D. Zheljazkov; et al.

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
91
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Worldwide, oilseed demand is steadily expanding. This study assessed the novel oilseed crop Camelina sativa L. in the Maritime Provinces of Canada. Evaluations of cultivar and applied N were performed at Truro, NS, Harrington, PEI, and Hartland, NB, in 2005 and 2006. The results show that the selection of cultivar is an important determinant for the potential success or failure of C. sativa production. Differences in plant stand, plant height, seed yield, oil content and fatty acid profile were found among the cultivars. The cultivar Calena provided the most consistent performance in terms of plant establishment, yield and oil content across all year-sites. Plant height, seed yield, oil content, total plant N and seed protein all responded to applied N rate. Applied N increased the seed yield of C. sativa, but the increase was not significant when the application rates were over 60 kg N ha -1 in NS or 80 kg N ha -1 in PEI. Plant height, total N content in plant tissue and seed protein content increased with increased N application, while oil content decreased. With the exception of erucic acid, all the main fatty acids in C. sativa oil responded to applied N levels or the interaction of N levels and year. Regression analysis showed that the contents of oleic acid and eicosenoic acid decreased with increased N application. The response of linolenic acid to N application was not consistent at each year-site. Results of this study provide convincing evidence of the agronomic suitability of C. sativa to the Maritime Provinces of Canada. Key words: Camelina sativa, cultivar, nitrogen, yield, seed quality

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivars of Camelina sativa differed in plant stand, plant height and seed yield.

Taxon
Camelina sativa L.Camelina sativat0
Treatment
cultivarse0
Outcome
plant stand, plant height, seed yielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camelina sativa
Camelina sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryGerhard Nitter, Reutlingen. · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Differences in plant stand, plant height, seed yield, oil content and fatty acid profile were found among the cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 406–525 · show in text ↑
t0

“Camelina sativa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivars of Camelina sativa differed in oil content and fatty acid profile.

Taxon
Camelina sativa L.Camelina sativat0
Treatment
cultivarse0
Outcome
oil content and fatty acid profilee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camelina sativa
Camelina sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryGerhard Nitter, Reutlingen. · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Differences in plant stand, plant height, seed yield, oil content and fatty acid profile were found among the cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 406–525 · show in text ↑
t0

“Camelina sativa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–84 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar Calena gave the most consistent plant establishment, yield and oil content across all year-sites.

Taxon
Camelina sativa L.Camelina sativat0
Material
Calenae0
Outcome
most consistent performance in terms of plant establishment, yield and oil contente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camelina sativa
Camelina sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryGerhard Nitter, Reutlingen. · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The cultivar Calena provided the most consistent performance in terms of plant establishment, yield and oil content across all year-sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 527–664 · show in text ↑
t0

“Camelina sativa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applied N increased the seed yield of C. sativa.

Taxon
Camelina sativa L.Camelina sativat0
Treatment
Applied Ne0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camelina sativa
Camelina sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryGerhard Nitter, Reutlingen. · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applied N increased the seed yield of C. sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–816 · show in text ↑
t0

“Camelina sativa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In Nova Scotia the seed yield increase from applied N was not significant at rates over 60 kg N ha -1.

Taxon
Camelina sativa L.Camelina sativat0
Treatment
over 60 kg N ha -1e0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Setting
NSe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camelina sativa
Camelina sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryGerhard Nitter, Reutlingen. · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applied N increased the seed yield of C. sativa, but the increase was not significant when the application rates were over 60 kg N ha -1 in NS or 80 kg N ha -1 in PEI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–935 · show in text ↑
t0

“Camelina sativa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In Prince Edward Island the seed yield increase from applied N was not significant at rates over 80 kg N ha -1.

Taxon
Camelina sativa L.Camelina sativat0
Treatment
80 kg N ha -1e0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Setting
PEIe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camelina sativa
Camelina sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryGerhard Nitter, Reutlingen. · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applied N increased the seed yield of C. sativa, but the increase was not significant when the application rates were over 60 kg N ha -1 in NS or 80 kg N ha -1 in PEI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–935 · show in text ↑
t0

“Camelina sativa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant height, total N content in plant tissue and seed protein content increased with increased N application.

Taxon
Camelina sativa L.Camelina sativat0
Treatment
increased N applicatione0
Outcome
Plant height, total N content in plant tissue and seed protein contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camelina sativa
Camelina sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryGerhard Nitter, Reutlingen. · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant height, total N content in plant tissue and seed protein content increased with increased N application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1046 · show in text ↑
t0

“Camelina sativa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oil content decreased with increased N application.

Taxon
Camelina sativa L.Camelina sativat0
Treatment
increased N applicatione0
Outcome
oil contente0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camelina sativa
Camelina sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryGerhard Nitter, Reutlingen. · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant height, total N content in plant tissue and seed protein content increased with increased N application, while oil content decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1075 · show in text ↑
t0

“Camelina sativa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All main fatty acids in C. sativa oil except erucic acid responded to applied N levels or the interaction of N levels and year.

Taxon
Camelina sativa L.Camelina sativat0
Treatment
applied N levelse0
Outcome
all the main fatty acidse0
Qualifier
With the exception of erucic acide0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camelina sativa
Camelina sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryGerhard Nitter, Reutlingen. · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With the exception of erucic acid, all the main fatty acids in C. sativa oil responded to applied N levels or the interaction of N levels and year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1077–1223 · show in text ↑
t0

“Camelina sativa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Regression analysis showed that oleic acid and eicosenoic acid contents decreased with increased N application.

Taxon
Camelina sativa L.Camelina sativat0
Treatment
increased N applicatione0
Outcome
contents of oleic acid and eicosenoic acide0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camelina sativa
Camelina sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryGerhard Nitter, Reutlingen. · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Regression analysis showed that the contents of oleic acid and eicosenoic acid decreased with increased N application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1225–1342 · show in text ↑
t0

“Camelina sativa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The response of linolenic acid to N application was not consistent at each year-site.

Taxon
Camelina sativa L.Camelina sativat0
Treatment
N applicatione0
Outcome
response of linolenic acide0
Qualifier
not consistent at each year-sitee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camelina sativa
Camelina sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryGerhard Nitter, Reutlingen. · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The response of linolenic acid to N application was not consistent at each year-site”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1344–1428 · show in text ↑
t0

“Camelina sativa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–84 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that selection of cultivar is an important determinant of the success or failure of C. sativa production.

Taxon
C. sativaCamelina sativae0
Outcome
potential success or failure of C. sativa productione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camelina sativa
Camelina sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryGerhard Nitter, Reutlingen. · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the selection of cultivar is an important determinant for the potential success or failure of C. sativa production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 290–404 · show in text ↑
t0

“Camelina sativa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–84 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that the study provides convincing evidence of the agronomic suitability of C. sativa to the Maritime Provinces of Canada.

Taxon
C. sativaCamelina sativae0
Outcome
agronomic suitabilitye0
Setting
Maritime Provinces of Canadae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camelina sativa
Camelina sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryGerhard Nitter, Reutlingen. · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results of this study provide convincing evidence of the agronomic suitability of C. sativa to the Maritime Provinces of Canada”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1430–1557 · show in text ↑
t0

“Camelina sativa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–84 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · quality: oil · Camelina sativa (false flax)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 3 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

nitrogen · quality: protein · Camelina sativa (false flax)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Camelina sativa (false flax)Results agree

13 papers: 13 positive, 0 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.