Paper · 1978 · Agronomy Journal

Effects of Corn Stover, Manure, and Nitrogen on Soil Properties and Crop Yield1

J. W. Ketcheson; E. G. Beauchamp

15
claims
30
verbatim quotes
23
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Residues and farmyard manures are considered important in determining the N fertilizer requirement of crops. This relationship was studied in a 10‐year field experiment on a Typic Hapludalf soil (pH 7.8). Five levels of fertilizer N were applied annually with three management treatments which included 1) returning the stover produced by the preceding corn ( Zea mays L.) crop, 2) poultry manure equivalent to 112 kg N/ha/year and 3) no stover returned or manure applied. Dry matter yields and N in grain and stover were measured each year. In general, the manure treatment without N fertilizer gave yields comparable with any other treatment. Where fertilizer N was not applied, stover depressed yields; but where N was applied, stover resulted in slightly higher fields than where stover was removed. Stover returned to the soil did not increase fertilizer N requirements at nomal rates of application. Fertilizer N narrowed the C/N ratio of the stover residue, but this additional N was not reflected in the total N content of the grain or the soil. Regression equations for yields of grain and N on N applied indicated that a single term, the square root of N applied, would fit the response pattern for the majority of treatments, not including manure in most years. Treatments including manure required terms with the square and cube of applied fertilizer N levels to describe the response pattern. Yields from residual N were higher on plots where stover had not been applied than where applied and, at the highest level of applied N, equalled those from residual manure. Soil organic matter (OM) declined during the experiment, but stover residues and manure gave a smaller decline than without residues. Applied N did not help to conserve OM, but increased inorganic N (NO 3 ‐ + NH 4 + ) in the soil. The degree of water‐stable aggregation was increased by stover and manure treatments. It was concluded that corn stover residue did not affect the N fertilizer requirement of this soil for grain corn production. Annual applications of liquid poultry manure, containing N equivalent to 112 kg/ha, precluded a requirement for fertilizer N.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure without nitrogen fertilizer produced yields comparable with any other treatment.

Treatment
manure treatment without N fertilizere0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
comparablee0
Comparator
any other treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the manure treatment without N fertilizer gave yields comparable with any other treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–652 · show in text ↑
e1

“preceding corn ( Zea mays L.) crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–386 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Returned stover depressed yields when fertilizer nitrogen was absent.

Treatment
stovere0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
depressede0
Qualifier
Where fertilizer N was not appliede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Where fertilizer N was not applied, stover depressed yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–713 · show in text ↑
e1

“preceding corn ( Zea mays L.) crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–386 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With nitrogen fertilizer, returned stover slightly raised yields relative to removal.

Treatment
stovere0
Outcome
fieldse0
Direction
slightly highere0
Comparator
where stover was removede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“where N was applied, stover resulted in slightly higher fields than where stover was removed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–811 · show in text ↑
e1

“preceding corn ( Zea mays L.) crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–386 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Returning stover did not increase fertilizer nitrogen requirements at normal rates.

Treatment
Stover returned to the soile0
Outcome
fertilizer N requirementse0
Direction
did not increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Stover returned to the soil did not increase fertilizer N requirements at nomal rates of application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–913 · show in text ↑
e1

“preceding corn ( Zea mays L.) crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–386 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer nitrogen narrowed the stover residue carbon to nitrogen ratio.

Treatment
Fertilizer Ne0
Outcome
C/N ratio of the stover residuee0
Direction
narrowede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fertilizer N narrowed the C/N ratio of the stover residue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 915–972 · show in text ↑
e1

“preceding corn ( Zea mays L.) crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–386 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Additional nitrogen did not increase total nitrogen in grain or soil.

Treatment
additional Ne0
Outcome
total N content of the grain or the soile0
Direction
not reflectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this additional N was not reflected in the total N content of the grain or the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1061 · show in text ↑
e1

“preceding corn ( Zea mays L.) crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–386 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A square root term for applied nitrogen fit most grain and nitrogen yield responses, except most manure treatments.

Outcome
response patterne0
Comparator
majority of treatmentse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“a single term, the square root of N applied, would fit the response pattern for the majority of treatments, not including manure in most years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1138–1280 · show in text ↑
e1

“Regression equations for yields of grain and N on N applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1063–1122 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure treatments required square and cube terms for nitrogen response fits.

Outcome
response patterne0
Comparator
Treatments including manuree0

Verbatim

e0

“Treatments including manure required terms with the square and cube of applied fertilizer N levels to describe the response pattern”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1282–1413 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual nitrogen yielded more without stover than with stover.

Treatment
stover had not been appliede0
Outcome
Yields from residual Ne0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
where appliede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yields from residual N were higher on plots where stover had not been applied than where applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1415–1511 · show in text ↑
e1

“preceding corn ( Zea mays L.) crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–386 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil organic matter declined over the experiment.

Outcome
Soil organic matter (OM)e0
Direction
declinede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil organic matter (OM) declined during the experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1589–1644 · show in text ↑
e1

“preceding corn ( Zea mays L.) crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–386 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stover and manure reduced the decline in soil organic matter.

Treatment
stover residues and manuree0
Outcome
Soil organic matter (OM)e1
Direction
smaller declinee0
Comparator
without residuese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stover residues and manure gave a smaller decline than without residues”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1650–1721 · show in text ↑
e1

“Soil organic matter (OM) declined during the experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1589–1644 · show in text ↑
e2

“preceding corn ( Zea mays L.) crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–386 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applied nitrogen did not conserve soil organic matter.

Treatment
Applied Ne0
Outcome
OMe0
Direction
did not help to conservee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applied N did not help to conserve OM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1723–1760 · show in text ↑
e1

“preceding corn ( Zea mays L.) crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–386 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applied nitrogen increased soil inorganic nitrogen.

Treatment
Applied Ne0
Outcome
inorganic N (NO 3 ‐ + NH 4 + ) in the soile0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applied N did not help to conserve OM, but increased inorganic N (NO 3 ‐ + NH 4 + ) in the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1723–1818 · show in text ↑
e1

“preceding corn ( Zea mays L.) crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–386 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stover and manure increased water stable aggregation.

Treatment
stover and manure treatmentse0
Outcome
water‐stable aggregatione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The degree of water‐stable aggregation was increased by stover and manure treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1820–1904 · show in text ↑
e1

“preceding corn ( Zea mays L.) crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–386 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Annual liquid poultry manure at 112 kg/ha nitrogen removed the need for fertilizer nitrogen.

Treatment
Annual applications of liquid poultry manure, containing N equivalent to 112 kg/hae0
Outcome
precluded a requirement for fertilizer Ne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Annual applications of liquid poultry manure, containing N equivalent to 112 kg/ha, precluded a requirement for fertilizer N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2032–2156 · show in text ↑
e1

“preceding corn ( Zea mays L.) crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–386 · show in text ↑

fertilization · soil: physics · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

93 papers: 83 positive, 10 negative or no effect

82 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

89 papers more in this group

See all 93 papers →

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

339 papers: 303 positive, 36 negative or no effect

302 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

335 papers more in this group

See all 339 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.