Paper · 2001 · Canadian Journal of Plant Science

Variable fruit set in self-fertile sweet cherry

Cheol Choi,; Robert L. Andersen

8
claims
14
verbatim quotes
29
citations
5
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Fruit set on seven self-fertile (SF) sweet cherry genotypes from the Cornell Sweet Cherry Breeding Program was investigated. The S-alleles of all tested genotypes, based on controlled pollination and PCR-based S-allele typing analysis were determined to be: S 1 S 4 ’ for Lapins, and S 3 S 4 ’ for Stella, Starkrimson, NY 13688, NY 13696, NY 13788 and NY 13791. Higher fruit set of open-pollinated self-fertile genotypes indicated that the additional pollen donor was probably advantageous for fruit set in self-fertiles in the preliminary field study. However, no statistically significant differences were found between fully and self- (half compatible) pollination in caged trees in subsequent years’ studies. This inconsistency may have been due to shading by cages (for self-pollination only) or to differences in bee activity in caged trees as compared with open-pollinations made during preliminary studies. Additionally, the variation in fruit setting potential was dependent on genotype. Spring frost injury reduced fruit setting potential in self-fertile sweet cherries but pollen quality was not associated with variable fruit set. The results suggest that self-pollination would produce optimal fruit set in self-fertile sweet cherry cultivars regardless of partial pollen incompatibility. However, a more detailed study including fruit setting factors other than spring frost injury, and varying setting capacity depending on genotypes, would be required for a more complete determination of the commercial utility of growing self-fertile sweet cherries in solid blocks. Key words: Prunus avium L, sweet cherry, pollination, fruit set

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lapins had S 1 S 4 ’ alleles.

Taxon
sweet cherryPrunus aviumt0
Material
Lapinse0
Gene
S 1 S 4 ’e0
Outcome
S 1 S 4 ’e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“S 1 S 4 ’ for Lapins”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 258–278 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet cherry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–47 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Six other genotypes had S 3 S 4 ’ alleles.

Taxon
sweet cherryPrunus aviumt0
Gene
S 3 S 4 ’e0
Outcome
S 3 S 4 ’e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“S 3 S 4 ’ for Stella, Starkrimson, NY 13688, NY 13696, NY 13788 and NY 13791”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–360 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet cherry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Open pollination yielded higher fruit set in the preliminary field study.

Taxon
sweet cherryPrunus aviumt0
Treatment
open-pollinatede0
Outcome
fruit sete0
Direction
Highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher fruit set of open-pollinated self-fertile genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 362–420 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet cherry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fully and self-pollination did not differ significantly in caged trees.

Taxon
sweet cherryPrunus aviumt0
Treatment
fullye0
Outcome
pollinatione0
Comparator
self- (half compatible) pollinatione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no statistically significant differences were found between fully and self- (half compatible) pollination in caged trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 562–682 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet cherry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–47 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit-setting potential varied by genotype.

Taxon
sweet cherryPrunus aviumt0
Material
genotypee0
Outcome
fruit setting potentiale0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“variation in fruit setting potential was dependent on genotype”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–995 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet cherry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–47 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spring frost injury reduced fruit setting potential.

Taxon
sweet cherriesPrunus aviume0
Treatment
Spring frost injurye0
Outcome
fruit setting potentiale0
Direction
reducede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spring frost injury reduced fruit setting potential in self-fertile sweet cherries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1079 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pollen quality was not associated with variable fruit set.

Taxon
sweet cherryPrunus aviumt0
Organ / stage
pollene0
Outcome
variable fruit sete0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pollen quality was not associated with variable fruit set”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1084–1141 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet cherry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–47 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors suggest self-pollination could produce optimal fruit set despite partial incompatibility.

Taxon
sweet cherryPrunus aviume0
Outcome
self-pollination would produce optimal fruit sete0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“self-pollination would produce optimal fruit set in self-fertile sweet cherry cultivars regardless of partial pollen incompatibility”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1168–1300 · show in text ↑