Paper · 1927 · Annals of Applied Biology

THE INFLUENCE OF TILLETIA TRITICI (BJERK.) WINT. AND TILLETIA LAEVIS KÜHN ON THE GROWTH OF CERTAIN WHEAT VARIETIES

KATHLEEN SAMPSON; D. WALTERS DAVIES

16
claims
32
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Summary. Summarising the results of the experiments described in the present paper, it is evident that bunt has a distinct influence on vegetative organs of the plant in addition to the well‐known effect on the grain. Both species which cause bunt, Tilletia tritici and T. laevis , were included in one experiment only, from which it appears that the influence of the latter species, while tending hi the same direction, was distinctly weaker in its effect than T. tritici . This conclusion is in harmony with the results of other workers (4,10, 11). The following conclusions refer to T. tritici , with which speck the work was mainly carried out: Soil germination and establishment. The actual percentage of germination has not been found. to differ appreciably in bunt‐free and bunt‐contaminated samples, but in one experiment a considerable difference was manifest in the final establishment, the bunt‐free samples showing an increase of 25–37 per cent, when compared with those which were contaminated with spores before sowing (Table I). The greatest difference (37 per cent.) was shown by the variety Browick, which gave the lowest establishment figure and had presumably suffered most intensely from the unfavourable climatic conditions. Early growth. The first visible symptoms of a retarding influence on growth are not always manifest at the same stage of development in the wheat plant. Under one set of conditions (p. 92) the effect was clearly shown by plants in the seedling stage, since those derived from bunt‐contaminated seed differed from the control by 14–17 per cent. in height, and 16–20 per cent. in the dry weight of 100 shoots. In another experiment (p. 97) where a considerable reduction in height was evident at maturity the plants showed no appreciable effect during the first ten weeks of growth. Tillering. In the matter of tillering the influence of the fungus was in the opposite direction to that recorded for growth in height, bunted plants at the period of maximum tiller development producing in one experiment 16 per cent. more tillers than healthy plants grown under precisely the same conditions. At maturity in both cases the number of heads was considerably less than the total number of tillers produced, but bunted plants still showed an increase over those that were healthy (Experiments III and IV). A similar difference was noted in the case of plants grown in rows in the field 1 . Length of straw at maturity. A reduction in the length of straw appears to be one of the most constant results of the influence of the fungus on vegetative growth. It will no doubt be shown that the degree of reduction varies with the variety, the season and possibly with the origin of the spores used for contamination. In the experiments here described a reduction in height amounting to 16–19 per cent. in the case of Hen Gymro and 13 per cent, in the case of April Bearded was recorded. It was shown moreover that the reduction was considerably greater in the case of tillers carrying heads in which every grain was bunted than in the case of those bearing both healthy and bunted grain. Length of ripe ear. In the case of Hen Gymro wheat the fungus showed a slight retards effect on the length of the ear, while in the variety April Bearded the bunted ears were, if anything, slightly longer than the normal. More data are desirable on this point, since the influence on this organ is probably largely determined by the morphology of the ear in any particular variety. It appears to be generally recognised that ears of the compactum type are abnormally narrow and long when bearing bunted grain (6,15). Plate VII shows bunted and normal ears of T. vulgare var. Standard Red, which possesses normally relatively wide, dense ears. For comparison are shown healthy and diseased heads of Hen Gymro, which has ears characteristically lax. Root development. In one experiment where data were obtained on the dry weight per 100 plants of the roots at maturity a significant difference was apparent between bunted and healthy specimens, the former showing a decrease of 22 per cent. From the practical point of view, where the final yield of healthy grain is of primary consideration, the most important aspect of the question, apart from the effect on the grain itself, is probably the influence of the disease on establishment and early growth. It is of come recognised that any check which the plant receives in the early stages of growth will be exaggerated later in the case of plants placed in competition with healthy individuals, as must happen in a partially bunted field crop. The full extent of the retarding influence on growth was possibly not exhibited in certain of the experiments under review since the bunted plants were not seriously subject to competition. Since it has been shown that the presence of the parasite tends to increase tillering, the reduction in heads at harvest which was a striking feature of previous treatment experiments must be attributed either to the stimulating effect of the chemical used for treated lots, or to the depressing influence of bunt on establishment in the field. From the data here given the second alternative seems the more feasible, but since the Muence of bunt on establishment is, perhaps more than any other, reply to be affected by seasonal conditions and to differ with the variety and the origin of the seed, it is desirable to obtain further data on this of the problem, using a large number of seed samples and varieties and a wide range of environmental conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bunt-free samples had a 25–37 per cent higher final establishment than samples contaminated with spores before sowing.

Treatment
contaminated with spores before sowinge2
Outcome
final establishmente2
Direction
increasee2
Value
25–37 per cente2
Comparator
bunt‐free samplese2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CERTAIN WHEAT VARIETIES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–114 · show in text ↑
e2

“in one experiment a considerable difference was manifest in the final establishment, the bunt‐free samples showing an increase of 25–37 per cent, when compared with those which were contaminated with spores before sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–1032 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Browick showed the greatest establishment difference (37 per cent) between bunt-free and bunt-contaminated samples.

Material
Browicke3
Outcome
greatest differencee3
Value
37 per cent.e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CERTAIN WHEAT VARIETIES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–114 · show in text ↑
e3

“The greatest difference (37 per cent.) was shown by the variety Browick, which gave the lowest establishment figure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1044–1159 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At the seedling stage, plants from bunt-contaminated seed were 14–17 per cent shorter than the control.

Organ / stage
seedling stagee4
Treatment
bunt‐contaminated seede4
Outcome
heighte4
Direction
decreaseinferrede4
Value
14–17 per cent.e4
Comparator
the controle4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CERTAIN WHEAT VARIETIES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–114 · show in text ↑
e4

“the effect was clearly shown by plants in the seedling stage, since those derived from bunt‐contaminated seed differed from the control by 14–17 per cent. in height, and 16–20 per cent. in the dry weight of 100 shoots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1435–1652 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At the seedling stage, plants from bunt-contaminated seed had 16–20 per cent lower dry weight of 100 shoots than the control.

Organ / stage
shootse4
Treatment
bunt‐contaminated seede4
Outcome
dry weight of 100 shootse4
Direction
decreaseinferrede4
Value
16–20 per cent.e4
Comparator
the controle4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CERTAIN WHEAT VARIETIES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–114 · show in text ↑
e4

“the effect was clearly shown by plants in the seedling stage, since those derived from bunt‐contaminated seed differed from the control by 14–17 per cent. in height, and 16–20 per cent. in the dry weight of 100 shoots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1435–1652 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In one experiment, bunt reduced wheat height at maturity considerably.

Outcome
heighte7
Direction
reductione7
Qualifier
at maturitye7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CERTAIN WHEAT VARIETIES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–114 · show in text ↑
e7

“In another experiment (p. 97) where a considerable reduction in height was evident at maturity the plants showed no appreciable effect during the first ten weeks of growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1654–1825 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the same experiment, wheat plants showed no appreciable effect of bunt on growth during the first ten weeks.

Outcome
effect during the first ten weeks of growthe7
Direction
no appreciable effecte7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CERTAIN WHEAT VARIETIES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–114 · show in text ↑
e7

“In another experiment (p. 97) where a considerable reduction in height was evident at maturity the plants showed no appreciable effect during the first ten weeks of growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1654–1825 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bunted plants had 16 per cent more tillers than healthy plants at the period of maximum tiller development in one experiment.

Treatment
bunted plantse5
Outcome
tillerse5
Direction
moree5
Value
16 per cent.e5
Qualifier
period of maximum tiller developmente5
Comparator
healthy plantse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CERTAIN WHEAT VARIETIES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–114 · show in text ↑
e5

“bunted plants at the period of maximum tiller development producing in one experiment 16 per cent. more tillers than healthy plants grown under precisely the same conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1962–2135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At maturity, bunted plants showed more heads than healthy plants, although they had fewer heads than total tillers.

Treatment
bunted plantse6
Outcome
number of headse6
Direction
increasee6
Comparator
healthye6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CERTAIN WHEAT VARIETIES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–114 · show in text ↑
e6

“At maturity in both cases the number of heads was considerably less than the total number of tillers produced, but bunted plants still showed an increase over those that were healthy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2137–2319 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the experiments, bunt reduced the height of Hen Gymro wheat by 16–19 per cent.

Material
Hen Gymroe1
Outcome
heighte1
Direction
reductione1
Value
16–19 per cent.e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CERTAIN WHEAT VARIETIES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–114 · show in text ↑
e1

“In the experiments here described a reduction in height amounting to 16–19 per cent. in the case of Hen Gymro and 13 per cent, in the case of April Bearded was recorded”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2752–2920 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the experiments, bunt reduced the height of April Bearded wheat by 13 per cent.

Material
April Beardede1
Outcome
heighte1
Direction
reductione1
Value
13 per cente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CERTAIN WHEAT VARIETIES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–114 · show in text ↑
e1

“In the experiments here described a reduction in height amounting to 16–19 per cent. in the case of Hen Gymro and 13 per cent, in the case of April Bearded was recorded”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2752–2920 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The reduction in height was considerably greater for tillers whose every grain was bunted than for tillers with both healthy and bunted grain.

Treatment
every grain was buntede2
Outcome
the reductione2
Direction
greatere2
Qualifier
tillers carrying headse2
Comparator
both healthy and bunted graine2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CERTAIN WHEAT VARIETIES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–114 · show in text ↑
e2

“the reduction was considerably greater in the case of tillers carrying heads in which every grain was bunted than in the case of those bearing both healthy and bunted grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2949–3121 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bunt showed a slight retarding effect on the ear length of Hen Gymro wheat.

Material
Hen Gymroe3
Outcome
length of the eare3
Direction
retardse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CERTAIN WHEAT VARIETIES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–114 · show in text ↑
e3

“In the case of Hen Gymro wheat the fungus showed a slight retards effect on the length of the ear”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3143–3240 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In April Bearded wheat, bunted ears were, if anything, slightly longer than normal ears.

Material
April Beardede4
Outcome
bunted earse4
Direction
longere4
Qualifier
if anything, slightlye4
Comparator
the normale4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CERTAIN WHEAT VARIETIES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–114 · show in text ↑
e4

“in the variety April Bearded the bunted ears were, if anything, slightly longer than the normal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3248–3343 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bunted wheat had a significantly lower dry weight of roots (22 per cent) per 100 plants than healthy specimens at maturity.

Organ / stage
rootse5
Treatment
buntede5
Outcome
dry weight per 100 plants of the rootse5
Direction
decreasee5
Value
22 per cente5
Qualifier
at maturitye5
Comparator
healthy specimense5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CERTAIN WHEAT VARIETIES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–114 · show in text ↑
e5

“In one experiment where data were obtained on the dry weight per 100 plants of the roots at maturity a significant difference was apparent between bunted and healthy specimens, the former showing a decrease of 22 per cent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3889–4110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The influence of T. laevis on wheat was distinctly weaker than that of T. tritici.

Treatment
the latter speciese1
Interactor
T. laevisTilletia laevise1pathogen
Second interactor
T. triticiTilletia cariese1pathogen
Outcome
the influencee1
Direction
weakere1
Comparator
T. triticie1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tilletia caries
Tilletia caries · Second interactorAgronom · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CERTAIN WHEAT VARIETIES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–114 · show in text ↑
e1

“Both species which cause bunt, Tilletia tritici and T. laevis , were included in one experiment only, from which it appears that the influence of the latter species, while tending hi the same direction, was distinctly weaker in its effect than T. tritici”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 218–472 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bunt-contaminated and bunt-free samples did not differ appreciably in the percentage of germination.

Treatment
bunt‐contaminated samplese6
Outcome
percentage of germinatione6
Direction
no_changeinferrede6
Comparator
bunt‐freee6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CERTAIN WHEAT VARIETIES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–114 · show in text ↑
e6

“The actual percentage of germination has not been found. to differ appreciably in bunt‐free and bunt‐contaminated samples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 685–806 · show in text ↑