Paper · 2009 · Nigerian Journal of Horticultural Science

Effect of nitrogen fertiliser on the growth and calyx yield of two cultivars of roselle

GM Bala; JA Fagbayide

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field experiments were carried out during the 2000 and 2001 rainy seasons on the field of National Horticultural Research Institute at Bagauda (latitude 11o 33’ N and longitude 8o 23’E of the equator). The experiment was aimed at evaluating the response of roselle cultivars to different levels of N in combination with 50 kg P/ha and establishing anoptimum N fertilizer requirement by roselle. Five rates of nitrogen (0, 30, 60, 90 and 120 kg N ha-1) were combined with deep red and pure white cultivars of roselle in a randomized complete block design arrangement with three replications. Application of N significantly (p < 0.05) increased plant height, number of leaves, branches, pods, calyx and seed yieldso roselle. Application of 50 kg P/ha as basal dressing significantly (p < 0.05) influenced the production of calyces among the cultivars. In Nothern Guinea savanna, calyx yield of 2.38 t/ha fresh weight with a corresponding dry matter of 1.02 t/ha were significantly different (p < 0.05) when 30 kg N/ha was applied to deep red cultivar and second season (2001) was better than the first season (2000). Similarly, significantly differences (p

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen application significantly increased roselle plant height, leaf, branch and pod numbers, and calyx and seed yields.

Treatment
Application of Ne0
Outcome
plant height, number of leaves, branches, pods, calyx and seed yieldso rosellee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hibiscus sabdariffa
Hibiscus sabdariffa · TaxonInvertzoo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of N significantly (p < 0.05) increased plant height, number of leaves, branches, pods, calyx and seed yieldso roselle.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 591–722 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Basal phosphorus application significantly affected calyx production among roselle cultivars.

Treatment
50 kg P/ha as basal dressinge0
Outcome
production of calycese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hibiscus sabdariffa
Hibiscus sabdariffa · TaxonInvertzoo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 50 kg P/ha as basal dressing significantly (p < 0.05) influenced the production of calyces among the cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–849 · show in text ↑
t0

“roselle”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–87 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 30 kg N/ha, deep red roselle produced 2.38 t/ha fresh calyx yield in the Northern Guinea savanna.

Material
deep red cultivare0
Treatment
30 kg N/hae0
Outcome
calyx yielde0
Value
2.38 t/ha fresh weighte0
Setting
Nothern Guinea savannae0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hibiscus sabdariffa
Hibiscus sabdariffa · TaxonInvertzoo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In Nothern Guinea savanna, calyx yield of 2.38 t/ha fresh weight with a corresponding dry matter of 1.02 t/ha were significantly different (p < 0.05) when 30 kg N/ha was applied to deep red cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 850–1048 · show in text ↑
t0

“roselle”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–87 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 30 kg N/ha, deep red roselle had corresponding calyx dry matter of 1.02 t/ha.

Material
deep red cultivare0
Treatment
30 kg N/hae0
Outcome
dry mattere0
Value
1.02 t/hae0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hibiscus sabdariffa
Hibiscus sabdariffa · TaxonInvertzoo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“calyx yield of 2.38 t/ha fresh weight with a corresponding dry matter of 1.02 t/ha were significantly different (p < 0.05) when 30 kg N/ha was applied to deep red cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–1048 · show in text ↑
t0

“roselle”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–87 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 2001 roselle growing season performed better than 2000.

Outcome
bettere0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
first season (2000)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hibiscus sabdariffa
Hibiscus sabdariffa · TaxonInvertzoo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“second season (2001) was better than the first season (2000)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1053–1113 · show in text ↑
t0

“roselle”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–87 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · growth · Hibiscus sabdariffa (roselle)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.