Paper · 2012 · Journal of Sustainable Agriculture

Cover Crops in Mono- and Biculture for Accumulation of Biomass and Soil Organic Carbon

Qingren Wang; Yuncong Li; Ashok Alva

4
claims
7
verbatim quotes
18
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Plant biomass production associated with soil organic carbon (C) accumulation is a critical challenge for sustainable agriculture development because soil quality degradation and organic carbon pool depletion have become a concern under some circumstances. To elucidate cover crops and their synergetic effects in biomass production and soil organic C improvement, legume and non-legume winter/summer cover crops, in mono- and biculture (mixture of legume/non-legume) were evaluated in the field and controlled (growth chamber) conditions. Under field conditions, biculture of sunn hemp and sorghum sudangrass produced 24.1 Mg ha−1 in contrast to 20.1 and 2.9 Mg ha−1 for each one alone; and biculture of okra and cowpea reached as much as 11.5 Mg ha−1 in contrast to 2.0 and 5.3 Mg ha−1 for each one in monoculture. After the growth of winter followed by summer cover crops, the soil organic C content increased with substantial quantities of plant biomass returned to the soil. The results suggest that both summer and winter cover crops demonstrate a promising potential in biomass C accumulation, thereby, can play an important role in soil fertility improvement to benefit the sustainable development of agriculture when appropriate types and combinations are selected. Keywords: cover cropdecompositionlegumenon-legumeorganic carbonsoil fertilitybioculturemonoculture Acknowledgments This research was financially supported via a USDA-ARS collaboration research program. Authors thank Dr. Thomas Davenport, Mr. Robert Stubblefield, Jeorge Vergel, Jacob Hall, Ms. Guiqin Yu, and Laura Rosado at TREC, University of Florida for their supports with growth chamber and field facilities and/or help in sample collections and chemical analyses.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biculture of sunn hemp and sorghum sudangrass produced more biomass than either crop alone under field conditions.

Taxon
sunn hemp and sorghum sudangrasse2
Treatment
biculture of sunn hemp and sorghum sudangrasse2
Outcome
biomass productione0
Direction
higherinferrede2
Value
24.1 Mg ha−1e2
Qualifier
20.1 and 2.9 Mg ha−1e2
Comparator
for each one alonee2
Setting
Under field conditionse2

Verbatim

e0

“their synergetic effects in biomass production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–341 · show in text ↑
e2

“Under field conditions, biculture of sunn hemp and sorghum sudangrass produced 24.1 Mg ha−1 in contrast to 20.1 and 2.9 Mg ha−1 for each one alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 549–695 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biculture of okra and cowpea produced more biomass than either crop in monoculture under field conditions.

Treatment
biculture of okra and cowpeae3
Outcome
biomass productione0
Direction
higherinferrede3
Value
11.5 Mg ha−1e3
Qualifier
2.0 and 5.3 Mg ha−1e3
Comparator
for each one in monoculturee3
Setting
Under field conditionse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“their synergetic effects in biomass production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–341 · show in text ↑
e2

“Under field conditions, biculture of sunn hemp and sorghum sudangrass produced 24.1 Mg ha−1 in contrast to 20.1 and 2.9 Mg ha−1 for each one alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 549–695 · show in text ↑
e3

“biculture of okra and cowpea reached as much as 11.5 Mg ha−1 in contrast to 2.0 and 5.3 Mg ha−1 for each one in monoculture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–824 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growing winter followed by summer cover crops increased soil organic C content.

Taxon
cover cropse4
Treatment
growth of winter followed by summer cover cropse4
Outcome
soil organic C contente4
Direction
increasede4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e4

“After the growth of winter followed by summer cover crops, the soil organic C content increased with substantial quantities of plant biomass returned to the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 826–987 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Summer and winter cover crops show promising potential for biomass C accumulation when appropriate types and combinations are selected.

Taxon
cover cropse5
Treatment
appropriate types and combinationse5
Outcome
biomass C accumulatione5

Verbatim

e5

“The results suggest that both summer and winter cover crops demonstrate a promising potential in biomass C accumulation, thereby, can play an important role in soil fertility improvement to benefit the sustainable development of agriculture when appropriate types and combinations are selected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1282 · show in text ↑

Vigna unguiculata · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.