Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Cowpea intercropping increased okra-equivalent yield to a maximum of 34.98 tonnes/ha.

A claim from Production potential and economics of vegetables intercropped with rainfed okra · 1993

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea intercropping increased okra-equivalent yield to a maximum of 34.98 tonnes/ha.

Treatment
Intercropping of cowpeae1
Outcome
okra-equivalent yielde2
Direction
increasede2
Value
34.98 tonnes/hae2
Qualifier
16.31 tonnes/hae2
Comparator
pure crop of okrae2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Intercropping of cowpea gave 60 per cent reduced yield of okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 208–270
e2

“the okra-equivalent yield increased to a maximum of 34.98 tonnes/ha raising the productivity by 31–53 per cent compared with other intercropping combinations as well as pure crop of okra (16.31 tonnes/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 276–480

Title

Production potential and economics of vegetables intercropped with rainfed okra

Ranjana Singh Indian Journal of Horticulture 1993

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-dd9fd71e3dcbf934eb61e9328e3b9a1e19ab879af416c90346dc32106ef19210 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

Vigna unguiculata · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 10 papers →

intercropping · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

46 papers: 25 positive, 21 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this claim · 21 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

37 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.