Paper · 2012 · International Journal of Food Science & Technology

Quality response of table grapes (Vitis vinifera L.) during cold storage to postharvest cap stem excision and hot water treatments

Ferhan K. Sabir; Ali Sabir

12
claims
28
verbatim quotes
30
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Summary Berry quality, total phenol, sensory characteristics and decay incidence of grapes ( V. vinifera cvs . Müşküle and Red Globe) as affected by prestorage hot water immersion with or without cap stem excision treatments were investigated with 7‐day interval during storage at 1 °C for 21 days. Weight loss occurred mainly up to the second week and was more pronounced for the untreated control samples subjected to the stem excision. In Müşküle, the least weight loss value was obtained from hot water–treated grapes (0.62%), while the highest loss occurred in control grapes of stem‐excised berries (0.96%). Immersion of stem‐retained grapes in hot water was the best applications for maintenance of overall storage quality for both cultivars. According to panellist scores, it is evident that hot water has positive effect on maintaining the minimally processed table grapes without altering the flavour and taste of the commodity. Stem‐retained berries of hot water treatment had the highest score for both Müşküle and Red Globe, with their values 3.8 and 4.2, respectively, while the least values were obtained from stem‐excised berries of untreated control group of both the cultivars (1.9 and 3.0, respectively). At the end of three‐week storage, the least decay rates were determined in stem‐retained berries that received hot water treatment (5.3% for Müşküle and 1.1% for Red Globe). Attenuate influence of brief high temperature exposure on ripening parameters (SSC, TA, MI, pH ) was also observed. Postharvest hot water treatment may be used as a nonchemical means to extent storage life of minimally processed grapes with its alleviating effect on physiological disorders. Cap stem retaining in minimal processing can be recommended to maintain the quality of grapes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In Müşküle, hot water treatment gave the least weight loss (0.62%).

Taxon
table grapest0
Material
Müşkülee1
Treatment
hot watere1
Outcome
weight losse1
Direction
leaste1
Value
0.62%e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“table grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–32 · show in text ↑
e1

“In Müşküle, the least weight loss value was obtained from hot water–treated grapes (0.62%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–529 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control grapes of stem-excised berries had the highest weight loss (0.96%).

Taxon
table grapest0
Treatment
stem excisione3
Outcome
losse2
Direction
higheste2
Value
0.96%e2
Comparator
control grapese2

Verbatim

t0

“table grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–32 · show in text ↑
e2

“while the highest loss occurred in control grapes of stem‐excised berries (0.96%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–612 · show in text ↑
e3

“Weight loss occurred mainly up to the second week and was more pronounced for the untreated control samples subjected to the stem excision”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 299–437 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Immersion in hot water was the best treatment for maintaining overall storage quality of table grapes.

Taxon
table grapest0
Treatment
hot watere4
Outcome
overall storage qualitye4
Direction
beste4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“table grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–32 · show in text ↑
e4

“in hot water was the best applications for maintenance of overall storage quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–729 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem-retained berries given hot water treatment had the highest sensory score for Müşküle and Red Globe (3.8 and 4.2).

Taxon
table grapest0
Material
Müşküle and Red Globee5
Treatment
hot water treatmente6
Outcome
scoree5
Direction
higheste5
Value
3.8 and 4.2e5

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“table grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–32 · show in text ↑
e5

“treatment had the highest score for both Müşküle and Red Globe, with their values 3.8 and 4.2, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1081 · show in text ↑
e6

“berries of hot water treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–983 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem-excised berries of the untreated control group had the lowest panellist scores (1.9 and 3.0).

Taxon
table grapest0
Treatment
stem excisione3
Outcome
panellist scorese7
Direction
leaste6
Value
1.9 and 3.0e6
Comparator
untreated control groupe6

Verbatim

t0

“table grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–32 · show in text ↑
e3

“Weight loss occurred mainly up to the second week and was more pronounced for the untreated control samples subjected to the stem excision”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 299–437 · show in text ↑
e6

“the least values were obtained from stem‐excised berries of untreated control group of both the cultivars (1.9 and 3.0, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1089–1222 · show in text ↑
e7

“According to panellist scores, it is evident that hot water has positive effect on maintaining the minimally processed table grapes without altering the flavour and taste of the commodity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 750–937 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hot water treatment gave the least decay rate in Müşküle (5.3%).

Taxon
table grapest0
Material
Müşkülee1
Treatment
hot water treatmente1
Outcome
decay ratese2
Direction
leaste2
Value
5.3%e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“table grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–32 · show in text ↑
e1

“received hot water treatment (5.3% for Müşküle and 1.1% for Red Globe)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1326–1396 · show in text ↑
e2

“the least decay rates were determined”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1258–1295 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hot water treatment gave the least decay rate in Red Globe (1.1%).

Taxon
table grapest0
Material
Red Globee1
Treatment
hot water treatmente1
Outcome
decay ratese2
Direction
leaste2
Value
1.1%e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“table grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–32 · show in text ↑
e1

“received hot water treatment (5.3% for Müşküle and 1.1% for Red Globe)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1326–1396 · show in text ↑
e2

“the least decay rates were determined”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1258–1295 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Brief high temperature exposure attenuated its influence on ripening parameters.

Taxon
table grapest0
Treatment
brief high temperature exposuree1
Outcome
ripening parameterse1
Direction
Attenuatee1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“table grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–32 · show in text ↑
e1

“Attenuate influence of brief high temperature exposure on ripening parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1398–1475 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem excision increased weight loss compared with untreated controls, mainly up to the second week.

Taxon
table grapest0
Treatment
stem excisione3
Outcome
Weight losse3
Direction
more pronouncede3
Comparator
untreated control samplese3

Verbatim

t0

“table grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–32 · show in text ↑
e3

“Weight loss occurred mainly up to the second week and was more pronounced for the untreated control samples subjected to the stem excision”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 299–437 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hot water treatment did not alter the flavour and taste of minimally processed table grapes.

Taxon
table grapest0
Treatment
hot watere7
Outcome
flavour and tastee7

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

t0

“table grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–32 · show in text ↑
e7

“According to panellist scores, it is evident that hot water has positive effect on maintaining the minimally processed table grapes without altering the flavour and taste of the commodity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 750–937 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Postharvest hot water treatment may be used as a nonchemical means to extend storage life of grapes.

Taxon
grapese1
Outcome
storage lifee1

Verbatim

e1

“to extent storage life of minimally processed grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1581–1633 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Cap stem retaining is recommended to maintain the quality of grapes in minimal processing.

Taxon
grapese1
Outcome
quality of grapese1

Verbatim

e1

“Cap stem retaining in minimal processing can be recommended to maintain the quality of grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1690–1783 · show in text ↑

heat · quality: postharvest · VitisPositive and negative results

8 papers: 4 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

heat · disease · VitisPositive and negative results

17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

heat · quality: general · VitisResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.