Paper · 2004 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Application of Organic and Inorganic Fertilizer for Sustainable Maize and Cowpea Yields in Nigeria

J. A. Adediran; L. B. Taiwo; M. O. Akande; et al.

11
claims
20
verbatim quotes
171
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract A pot experiment evaluating the influence of five rates each of compost, inorganic fertilizer (MFert), and combination of both fertilizers (OBF) on maize (Zea mays L.), performance was conducted in the greenhouse using three cropping cycle. This was followed by a field trial lasting four cropping seasons at Ilora in the derived savanna and at Ibadan in the forest zones of Nigeria. Maize followed by cowpea was used as test crops on the field. Application of the fertilizers led to increases in maize and cowpea grain yields and improved the nutrient element concentrations in maize leaf tissue. Agronomic effectiveness of compost and OBF on maize relative to MFert was 88 and 118%, at Ilora and 81 and 97% at Ibadan. There was an increase of 56 and 89% Relative Agronomic Effectiveness (RAE), for compost and OBF over MFert in the residual study on cowpea. Also, the soil macro and micro nutrient status was highly improved in comparison with the MFert at postharvest period. The optimum rates of the organic fertilizers for sustainable maize and cowpea yield were between 5 and 10 t ha−1. The agronomic effectiveness of the residual organic fertilizers was higher than that of MFert. Optimum rate of OBF was 5 t ha−1. Application of compost significantly increased total microbial biomass in the soil. Also, compost and OBF application led to a fairly high population of Azotobacter (N-fixing bacteria) and thus its biomass. The MFert, however caused a sharp reduction in microbial biomass in the soil. The organic fertilizer improved aggregate stability index and permeability of the soil. On the whole, the positive effects obtained from OBF and compost in this study favor the recycling of farm wastes for sustainable crop production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer application increased maize grain yield

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Application of the fertilizerse1
Outcome
grain yieldse1
Direction
increasese1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the influence of five rates each of compost, inorganic fertilizer (MFert), and combination of both fertilizers (OBF) on maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 37–176 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of the fertilizers led to increases in maize and cowpea grain yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 455–535 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer application increased cowpea grain yield

Treatment
Application of the fertilizerse1
Outcome
grain yieldse1
Direction
increasese1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the influence of five rates each of compost, inorganic fertilizer (MFert), and combination of both fertilizers (OBF) on maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 37–176 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of the fertilizers led to increases in maize and cowpea grain yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 455–535 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost and OBF had 88 and 118% agronomic effectiveness on maize relative to MFert at Ilora

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Outcome
Agronomic effectivenesse2
Value
88 and 118%e2
Comparator
MFerte2
Setting
Ilorae2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the influence of five rates each of compost, inorganic fertilizer (MFert), and combination of both fertilizers (OBF) on maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 37–176 · show in text ↑
e2

“Agronomic effectiveness of compost and OBF on maize relative to MFert was 88 and 118%, at Ilora and 81 and 97% at Ibadan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 607–727 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost and OBF increased cowpea relative agronomic effectiveness by 56 and 89% over MFert in the residual study

Outcome
Relative Agronomic Effectiveness (RAE)e3
Direction
increasee3
Value
56 and 89%e3
Comparator
MFerte3
Setting
residual studye3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“There was an increase of 56 and 89% Relative Agronomic Effectiveness (RAE), for compost and OBF over MFert in the residual study on cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 729–867 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Optimum rates of organic fertilizers for sustainable maize and cowpea yield are between 5 and 10 t ha-1

Taxon
maize and cowpeaVigna unguiculataZea mayse4
Outcome
The optimum rates of the organic fertilizerse4
Value
5 and 10 t ha−1e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“The optimum rates of the organic fertilizers for sustainable maize and cowpea yield were between 5 and 10 t ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 988–1100 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Optimum rate of OBF for sustainable maize and cowpea yield is 5 t ha-1

Taxon
maize and cowpeaVigna unguiculataZea mayse4
Outcome
Optimum rate of OBFe5
Value
5 t ha−1e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“The optimum rates of the organic fertilizers for sustainable maize and cowpea yield were between 5 and 10 t ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 988–1100 · show in text ↑
e5

“Optimum rate of OBF was 5 t ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1197–1229 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of compost increased total microbial biomass in the soil

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Application of composte6
Outcome
total microbial biomasse6
Direction
increasede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the influence of five rates each of compost, inorganic fertilizer (MFert), and combination of both fertilizers (OBF) on maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 37–176 · show in text ↑
e6

“Application of compost significantly increased total microbial biomass in the soil. Also, compost and OBF application led to a fairly high population of Azotobacter (N-fixing bacteria) and thus its biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1231–1436 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MFert sharply reduced soil microbial biomass

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
MFerte7
Outcome
microbial biomasse7
Direction
reductione7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the influence of five rates each of compost, inorganic fertilizer (MFert), and combination of both fertilizers (OBF) on maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 37–176 · show in text ↑
e7

“The MFert, however caused a sharp reduction in microbial biomass in the soil. The organic fertilizer improved aggregate stability index and permeability of the soil. On the whole, the positive effects obtained from OBF and compost in this study favor the recycling of farm wastes for sustainable crop production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1438–1749 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost and OBF application led to a fairly high population of Azotobacter in the soil

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
compost and OBF applicatione6
Outcome
population of Azotobactere6
Direction
increaseinferrede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the influence of five rates each of compost, inorganic fertilizer (MFert), and combination of both fertilizers (OBF) on maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 37–176 · show in text ↑
e6

“Application of compost significantly increased total microbial biomass in the soil. Also, compost and OBF application led to a fairly high population of Azotobacter (N-fixing bacteria) and thus its biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1231–1436 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic fertilizer improved soil aggregate stability index and permeability

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
organic fertilizere7
Outcome
aggregate stability index and permeability of the soile7
Direction
improvede7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the influence of five rates each of compost, inorganic fertilizer (MFert), and combination of both fertilizers (OBF) on maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 37–176 · show in text ↑
e7

“The MFert, however caused a sharp reduction in microbial biomass in the soil. The organic fertilizer improved aggregate stability index and permeability of the soil. On the whole, the positive effects obtained from OBF and compost in this study favor the recycling of farm wastes for sustainable crop production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1438–1749 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Recycling of farm wastes is favored for sustainable crop production

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Outcome
recycling of farm wastes for sustainable crop productione7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the influence of five rates each of compost, inorganic fertilizer (MFert), and combination of both fertilizers (OBF) on maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 37–176 · show in text ↑
e7

“The MFert, however caused a sharp reduction in microbial biomass in the soil. The organic fertilizer improved aggregate stability index and permeability of the soil. On the whole, the positive effects obtained from OBF and compost in this study favor the recycling of farm wastes for sustainable crop production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1438–1749 · show in text ↑

fertilization · pest · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

64 papers: 42 positive, 22 negative or no effect

41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

60 papers more in this group

See all 64 papers →

fertilization · soil: biology · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

90 papers: 73 positive, 17 negative or no effect

72 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

86 papers more in this group

See all 90 papers →

fertilization · soil: physics · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

93 papers: 83 positive, 10 negative or no effect

82 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

89 papers more in this group

See all 93 papers →

fertilization · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

292 papers: 275 positive, 17 negative or no effect

274 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

288 papers more in this group

See all 292 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.