Paper · 1988 · Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science

Untersuchungen zum Wurzelwachstum von Jungpflanzen alter und neuer Winterweizensorten sowie eines Spelzweizens bei variierter N‐Versorgung

B. Feil; G. Geisler

14
claims
28
verbatim quotes
9
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Root growth of seedlings of old and new winter wheat cultivars and a spelt wheat at varying levels of nitrogen Root growth of five old (time period 1882–1920) and five new (time period 1975–1982) winter wheal cultivars and a spelt winter wheat cultivar was investigated in two greenhouse trials. Nitrogen (NH 4 NO 3 ) was supplied at six (Exp. I) and two (Exp. II) levels (sub‐ to supraoptimal for shoot growth). The seedlings were grown in sand‐filled polyethylene tubes of 4.5 cm diameter and 50 cm length at 20 o C. The plants were harvested 11 (Exp. I) and 12 (Exp. II) days after emergence. At this early stage of development root growth o: old and new cultivars differed only slightly. The old T. aestivum cultivars had more seminal roots. The longest roots of the modern cultivars penetrated into deeper layers of the substrate. For some traits, cultivar: seemed to respond specifically to the varying N‐supply. However, there were no significant difference: between old and new cultivars. Neither were old cultivars better adapted to low N‐fertilization nor were modern cultivars superior in tolerating toxic concentrations of NH 4 NO 3 . Increasing N supply changes root growth as follows: decline in root dry matter, increase in shoot/root ratio of dry weight, decrease in number of seminal roots, shortening of axes and more laterals, increase in diameter of the laterals and less significantly of the main roots, increase in density of laterals, decline in root surface area. The number of apices was affected only to a very small degree.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Root growth did not differ significantly between old and new winter wheat cultivars.

Taxon
T. aestivume2
Material
old and new cultivarse1
Outcome
significant differencee1
Direction
no significant differencee1

Verbatim

e1

“However, there were no significant difference: between old and new cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–1004 · show in text ↑
e2

“The old T. aestivum cultivars had more seminal roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–753 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Old wheat cultivars had more seminal roots.

Taxon
T. aestivume1
Material
old T. aestivum cultivarse1
Outcome
seminal rootse1
Direction
moree1

Verbatim

e1

“The old T. aestivum cultivars had more seminal roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–753 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The longest roots of modern wheat cultivars penetrated into deeper layers of the substrate.

Taxon
T. aestivume2
Material
modern cultivarse1
Outcome
longest rootse1
Direction
penetrated into deeper layerse1

Verbatim

e1

“The longest roots of the modern cultivars penetrated into deeper layers of the substrate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–843 · show in text ↑
e2

“The old T. aestivum cultivars had more seminal roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–753 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing N supply declined root dry matter.

Taxon
T. aestivume2
Treatment
Increasing N supplye1
Outcome
root dry mattere1
Direction
declinee1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“Increasing N supply changes root growth as follows: decline in root dry matter, increase in shoot/root ratio of dry weight, decrease in number of seminal roots, shortening of axes and more laterals, increase in diameter of the laterals and less significantly of the main roots, increase in density of laterals, decline in root surface area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1495 · show in text ↑
e2

“The old T. aestivum cultivars had more seminal roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–753 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing N supply increased the shoot/root ratio of dry weight.

Taxon
T. aestivume2
Treatment
Increasing N supplye1
Outcome
shoot/root ratio of dry weighte1
Direction
increasee1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“Increasing N supply changes root growth as follows: decline in root dry matter, increase in shoot/root ratio of dry weight, decrease in number of seminal roots, shortening of axes and more laterals, increase in diameter of the laterals and less significantly of the main roots, increase in density of laterals, decline in root surface area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1495 · show in text ↑
e2

“The old T. aestivum cultivars had more seminal roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–753 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing N supply decreased the number of seminal roots.

Taxon
T. aestivume2
Treatment
Increasing N supplye1
Outcome
number of seminal rootse1
Direction
decreasee1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“Increasing N supply changes root growth as follows: decline in root dry matter, increase in shoot/root ratio of dry weight, decrease in number of seminal roots, shortening of axes and more laterals, increase in diameter of the laterals and less significantly of the main roots, increase in density of laterals, decline in root surface area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1495 · show in text ↑
e2

“The old T. aestivum cultivars had more seminal roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–753 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing N supply shortened the axes of wheat roots.

Taxon
T. aestivume2
Treatment
Increasing N supplye1
Outcome
axese1
Direction
shorteninge1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“Increasing N supply changes root growth as follows: decline in root dry matter, increase in shoot/root ratio of dry weight, decrease in number of seminal roots, shortening of axes and more laterals, increase in diameter of the laterals and less significantly of the main roots, increase in density of laterals, decline in root surface area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1495 · show in text ↑
e2

“The old T. aestivum cultivars had more seminal roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–753 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing N supply produced more laterals.

Taxon
T. aestivume2
Treatment
Increasing N supplye1
Outcome
lateralse1
Direction
moree1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“Increasing N supply changes root growth as follows: decline in root dry matter, increase in shoot/root ratio of dry weight, decrease in number of seminal roots, shortening of axes and more laterals, increase in diameter of the laterals and less significantly of the main roots, increase in density of laterals, decline in root surface area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1495 · show in text ↑
e2

“The old T. aestivum cultivars had more seminal roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–753 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing N supply increased the diameter of the laterals.

Taxon
T. aestivume2
Treatment
Increasing N supplye1
Outcome
diameter of the lateralse1
Direction
increasee1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“Increasing N supply changes root growth as follows: decline in root dry matter, increase in shoot/root ratio of dry weight, decrease in number of seminal roots, shortening of axes and more laterals, increase in diameter of the laterals and less significantly of the main roots, increase in density of laterals, decline in root surface area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1495 · show in text ↑
e2

“The old T. aestivum cultivars had more seminal roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–753 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing N supply increased the density of laterals.

Taxon
T. aestivume2
Treatment
Increasing N supplye1
Outcome
density of lateralse1
Direction
increasee1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“Increasing N supply changes root growth as follows: decline in root dry matter, increase in shoot/root ratio of dry weight, decrease in number of seminal roots, shortening of axes and more laterals, increase in diameter of the laterals and less significantly of the main roots, increase in density of laterals, decline in root surface area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1495 · show in text ↑
e2

“The old T. aestivum cultivars had more seminal roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–753 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing N supply declined the root surface area.

Taxon
T. aestivume2
Treatment
Increasing N supplye1
Outcome
root surface areae1
Direction
declinee1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“Increasing N supply changes root growth as follows: decline in root dry matter, increase in shoot/root ratio of dry weight, decrease in number of seminal roots, shortening of axes and more laterals, increase in diameter of the laterals and less significantly of the main roots, increase in density of laterals, decline in root surface area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1495 · show in text ↑
e2

“The old T. aestivum cultivars had more seminal roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–753 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing N supply affected the number of root apices only to a very small degree.

Taxon
T. aestivume3
Treatment
Increasing N supplye2
Outcome
number of apicese1
Direction
affected only to a very small degreee1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“The number of apices was affected only to a very small degree”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1497–1558 · show in text ↑
e2

“Increasing N supply changes root growth as follows: decline in root dry matter, increase in shoot/root ratio of dry weight, decrease in number of seminal roots, shortening of axes and more laterals, increase in diameter of the laterals and less significantly of the main roots, increase in density of laterals, decline in root surface area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1495 · show in text ↑
e3

“The old T. aestivum cultivars had more seminal roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–753 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Modern wheat cultivars were not superior to old cultivars in tolerating toxic concentrations of NH 4 NO 3.

Taxon
T. aestivume2
Material
modern cultivarse1
Treatment
toxic concentrations of NH 4 NO 3e1
Outcome
toleratinge1
Direction
superiore1
Comparator
old cultivarse1

Verbatim

e1

“Neither were old cultivars better adapted to low N‐fertilization nor were modern cultivars superior in tolerating toxic concentrations of NH 4 NO 3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1006–1153 · show in text ↑
e2

“The old T. aestivum cultivars had more seminal roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–753 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Old wheat cultivars were not better adapted to low N fertilization.

Taxon
T. aestivume2
Material
old cultivarse1
Treatment
low N‐fertilizatione1
Outcome
adapted to low N‐fertilizatione1
Direction
bettere1

Verbatim

e1

“Neither were old cultivars better adapted to low N‐fertilization nor were modern cultivars superior in tolerating toxic concentrations of NH 4 NO 3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1006–1153 · show in text ↑
e2

“The old T. aestivum cultivars had more seminal roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–753 · show in text ↑