Paper · 2001 · Silva Fennica

Growth and phenology of hybrid aspen clones (Populus tremula L. x Populus tremuloides Michx.)

Qibin Yu; P. Tigerstedt; Matti Haapanen

8
claims
13
verbatim quotes
94
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

<ja:p>Height, basal diameter, diameter at breast height, bud burst, and leaf development were recorded in a 5-year-old hybrid aspen clonal trial. The field trial consisted of four aspen hybrid clones (Populus tremula x Populus tremuloides) and one local P. tremula seedling source. Phenological traits were observed in the 3rd year. Growth patterns were recorded during the 3rd and 4th years. Phenological traits were explored in relation to hybrid vigor expressed as growth traits. Differences were observed for phenological and growth traits among hybrid clones and P. tremula. The growth period varied from 143–158 days for the four hybrid clones, and was 112 days for P. tremula. The correlation between growth period and yield was highly significant. The annual growth rate of height for the hybrids was 4.2 cm per 7 days (2.4 for P. tremula) in the 3rd year and 6.4 cm per 7 days (2.9 for P. tremula) in the 4th year. After 5 years, mean estimated stem volume of the hybrids was 3.9 times that of P. tremula. Significant clone by year interaction was observed for height, diameter, and volume growth. The hybrid vigor seems to be mainly attributable to a longer growth period.</ja:p>

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phenological and growth traits differed among hybrid clones and P. tremula.

Taxon
P. tremulaPopulus tremulae0
Material
hybrid clonese0
Outcome
phenological and growth traitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus tremula
Populus tremula · TaxonØyvind Holmstad · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Differences were observed for phenological and growth traits among hybrid clones and P. tremula”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 483–578 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The growth period was 143–158 days for hybrid clones versus 112 days for P. tremula.

Taxon
P. tremulaPopulus tremulae0
Material
four hybrid clonese0
Outcome
growth periode0
Direction
variede0
Value
143–158 dayse0
Qualifier
112 dayse0
Comparator
P. tremulae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus tremula
Populus tremula · TaxonØyvind Holmstad · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The growth period varied from 143–158 days for the four hybrid clones, and was 112 days for P. tremula”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–682 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth period and yield were highly significantly correlated.

Taxon
hybrid aspent0
Organ / stage
growth periode0
Outcome
yielde0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The correlation between growth period and yield was highly significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–754 · show in text ↑
t0

“hybrid aspen clones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–43 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hybrid height grew 4.2 cm per 7 days in year three versus 2.4 for P. tremula.

Taxon
P. tremulaPopulus tremulae0
Material
hybridse0
Outcome
annual growth rate of heighte0
Value
4.2 cm per 7 dayse0
Qualifier
2.4 for P. tremulae0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus tremula
Populus tremula · TaxonØyvind Holmstad · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The annual growth rate of height for the hybrids was 4.2 cm per 7 days (2.4 for P. tremula) in the 3rd year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–863 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hybrid height grew 6.4 cm per 7 days in year four versus 2.9 for P. tremula.

Taxon
P. tremulaPopulus tremulae0
Material
hybrid aspen clonest0
Outcome
heighte1
Value
6.4 cm per 7 dayse0
Qualifier
2.9 for P. tremulae0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus tremula
Populus tremula · TaxonØyvind Holmstad · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“6.4 cm per 7 days (2.9 for P. tremula) in the 4th year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–922 · show in text ↑
t0

“Growth and phenology of hybrid aspen clones (Populus tremula L. x Populus tremuloides Michx.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–93 · show in text ↑
e1

“The annual growth rate of height for the hybrids was 4.2 cm per 7 days (2.4 for P. tremula) in the 3rd year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–863 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After five years, mean estimated hybrid stem volume was 3.9 times that of P. tremula.

Taxon
P. tremulaPopulus tremulae0
Material
hybridse0
Outcome
mean estimated stem volumee0
Value
3.9 timese0
Comparator
P. tremulae0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus tremula
Populus tremula · TaxonØyvind Holmstad · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After 5 years, mean estimated stem volume of the hybrids was 3.9 times that of P. tremula”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 924–1013 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Clone-by-year interaction was significant for height, diameter and volume growth.

Taxon
hybrid aspent0
Material
clonee0
Outcome
height, diameter, and volume growthe0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Significant clone by year interaction was observed for height, diameter, and volume growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1105 · show in text ↑
t0

“hybrid aspen clones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–43 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attribute hybrid vigor mainly to a longer growth period.

Taxon
hybrid aspent0
Outcome
hybrid vigore0
Qualifier
a longer growth periode0

Verbatim

e0

“The hybrid vigor seems to be mainly attributable to a longer growth period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1107–1181 · show in text ↑
t0

“hybrid aspen clones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–43 · show in text ↑