Paper · 2006 · Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata

Assessment of cotton aphids, Aphis gossypii, and their natural enemies on aphid‐resistant and aphid‐susceptible wheat varieties in a wheat–cotton relay intercropping system

Xiao Mu Ma; Xiao Xia Liu; Qing Wen Zhang; et al.

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
64
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The cotton aphid, Aphis gossypii Glover (Homoptera: Aphididae), is an important cotton pest in northern China, especially in the seedling stage of cotton. After large scale commercial use of transgenic Bt cotton, cotton aphids became one of the most important cotton pests. A 2‐year study was conducted to evaluate the role of four winter wheat varieties that were resistant or susceptible to wheat aphid, Sitobion avenae Fabricius (Homoptera: Aphididae), in conserving arthropod natural enemies and suppressing cotton aphids in a wheat–cotton relay intercropping system in northern China. The results indicated that wheat–cotton intercropping preserved and augmented natural enemies more than a monoculture of cotton. The density of natural enemies in cotton was significantly different among relay‐intercropping fields with different wheat varieties. The highest density of natural enemies and low cotton aphid populations were found in the treatment of cotton in relay intercropped with the wheat variety Lovrin10, which is susceptible to wheat aphid. The lowest density of predators and parasitoids associated with high cotton aphid populations were found with the wheat variety KOK1679, which is resistant to wheat aphid. The results showed that wheat varieties that are susceptible or moderately resistant to wheat aphid might reduce cotton aphids more effectively than an aphid‐resistant variety in the intercropping system by enhancing predators to suppress cotton aphids during the cotton seedling stage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat–cotton intercropping preserved and augmented natural enemies more than a monoculture of cotton.

Treatment
wheat–cotton intercroppinge1
Interactor
natural enemiese1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
natural enemiese1
Direction
augmentede1
Comparator
a monoculture of cottone1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton aphids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–27 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat–cotton intercropping preserved and augmented natural enemies more than a monoculture of cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–726 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Density of natural enemies in cotton differed significantly among relay-intercropping fields with different wheat varieties.

Treatment
different wheat varietiese3
Interactor
natural enemiese2biocontrol_agent
Outcome
density of natural enemiese2
Direction
significantly differente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton aphids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–27 · show in text ↑
e2

“The density of natural enemies in cotton was significantly different”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–796 · show in text ↑
e3

“with different wheat varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 830–860 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest natural enemy density in cotton occurred with the wheat variety Lovrin10 relay intercropped.

Material
Lovrin10e4
Treatment
relay intercropped with the wheat variety Lovrin10e4
Interactor
natural enemiese4biocontrol_agent
Outcome
density of natural enemiese4
Direction
higheste4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton aphids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–27 · show in text ↑
e4

“The highest density of natural enemies and low cotton aphid populations were found in the treatment of cotton in relay intercropped with the wheat variety Lovrin10, which is susceptible to wheat aphid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 862–1062 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton aphid populations were low in cotton relay intercropped with the wheat variety Lovrin10.

Treatment
relay intercropped with the wheat variety Lovrin10e4
Interactor
cotton aphidAphis gossypiie4pest
Outcome
cotton aphid populationse4
Direction
lowe4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aphis gossypii
Aphis gossypii · InteractorDr Lewis Wilson, CSIRO · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton aphids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–27 · show in text ↑
e4

“The highest density of natural enemies and low cotton aphid populations were found in the treatment of cotton in relay intercropped with the wheat variety Lovrin10, which is susceptible to wheat aphid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 862–1062 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The lowest density of predators and parasitoids occurred with the wheat variety KOK1679.

Treatment
the wheat variety KOK1679e5
Interactor
predators and parasitoidse5biocontrol_agent
Outcome
density of predators and parasitoidse5
Direction
loweste5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton aphids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–27 · show in text ↑
e5

“The lowest density of predators and parasitoids associated with high cotton aphid populations were found with the wheat variety KOK1679, which is resistant to wheat aphid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1234 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton aphid populations were high with the wheat variety KOK1679.

Treatment
the wheat variety KOK1679e5
Interactor
cotton aphidAphis gossypiie5pest
Outcome
cotton aphid populationse5
Direction
highe5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aphis gossypii
Aphis gossypii · InteractorDr Lewis Wilson, CSIRO · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton aphids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–27 · show in text ↑
e5

“The lowest density of predators and parasitoids associated with high cotton aphid populations were found with the wheat variety KOK1679, which is resistant to wheat aphid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1234 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat varieties susceptible or moderately resistant to wheat aphid might reduce cotton aphids more effectively than an aphid-resistant variety, by enhancing predators.

Treatment
wheat varieties that are susceptible or moderately resistant to wheat aphide6
Outcome
cotton aphidse6
Direction
reducee6
Qualifier
by enhancing predatorse6
Comparator
an aphid‐resistant varietye6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton aphids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–27 · show in text ↑
e6

“wheat varieties that are susceptible or moderately resistant to wheat aphid might reduce cotton aphids more effectively than an aphid‐resistant variety in the intercropping system by enhancing predators”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1260–1462 · show in text ↑

Triticum aestivum · ecology: diversity · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Triticum aestivum · Aphis gossypii · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

intercropping · ecology: diversity · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

intercropping · Aphis gossypii · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.