Paper · 2012 · International Journal of Phytoremediation

Effects of Cadmium on Enzymatic and Non-Enzymatic Antioxidative Defences of Rice (Oryza SativaL.)

Fangming Yu; Kehui Liu; Mingshun Li; et al.

9
claims
27
verbatim quotes
76
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effects of 60-d cadmium (Cd) exposure on enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidative system of Oryza sativa L. seedlings at tillering stage were studied using soil culture experiment. Research findings showed that chlorophyll content of Oryza sativa L. declined with the increase in soil metal concentration. Cd pollution induced the antioxidant stress by inducing O2(-1) and H2O2, which increased in plants; at the same time, MDA as the final product of peroxidation of membrane lipids, accumulated in plant. The antioxidant enzyme system was initiated under the Cd exposure, i.e. almost all the activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase, catalase, glutathione peroxidase, and ascorbate peroxidase were elevated both in leaves and roots. The non-protein thiols including phytochelatins and glutathione to scavenge toxic free radicals caused by Cd stress was also studied. The contents of phytochelatins and glutathione were about 3.12-6.65-fold and 3.27-10.73-fold in leaves, against control; and the corresponding values were about 3.53-9.37-fold and 1.41-5.11-fold in roots, accordingly.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice chlorophyll declined as soil cadmium concentration increased.

Taxon
Oryza sativa L.Oryza sativae0
Treatment
cadmium (Cd) exposuree1
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
declinede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chlorophyll content of Oryza sativa L. declined with the increase in soil metal concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 216–309 · show in text ↑
e1

“cadmium (Cd) exposure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cadmium increased superoxide and hydrogen peroxide in rice plants.

Taxon
Oryza sativa L.Oryza sativae1
Treatment
Cd pollutione0
Outcome
O2(-1) and H2O2e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cd pollution induced the antioxidant stress by inducing O2(-1) and H2O2, which increased in plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 311–409 · show in text ↑
e1

“Oryza sativa L. seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 97–122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cadmium exposure caused MDA accumulation in rice.

Taxon
Oryza sativa L.Oryza sativae2
Treatment
Cd pollutione1
Outcome
MDAe0
Direction
accumulatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“MDA as the final product of peroxidation of membrane lipids, accumulated in plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–510 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cd pollution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 311–323 · show in text ↑
e2

“Oryza sativa L. seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 97–122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cadmium elevated SOD, peroxidase and catalase activities in rice leaves and roots.

Taxon
Oryza sativa L.Oryza sativae2
Organ / stage
leaves and rootse0
Treatment
Cd exposuree1
Outcome
activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase, catalasee0
Direction
elevatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase, catalase, glutathione peroxidase, and ascorbate peroxidase were elevated both in leaves and roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–750 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cd exposure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 566–577 · show in text ↑
e2

“Oryza sativa L. seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 97–122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cadmium elevated glutathione peroxidase and ascorbate peroxidase in rice leaves and roots.

Taxon
Oryza sativa L.Oryza sativae2
Organ / stage
leaves and rootse0
Treatment
Cd exposuree1
Outcome
glutathione peroxidase, and ascorbate peroxidasee0
Direction
elevatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase, catalase, glutathione peroxidase, and ascorbate peroxidase were elevated both in leaves and roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–750 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cd exposure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 566–577 · show in text ↑
e2

“Oryza sativa L. seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 97–122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf phytochelatins reached 3.12–6.65-fold control under cadmium.

Taxon
Oryza sativa L.Oryza sativae2
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
Cd stresse1
Outcome
contents of phytochelatinse0
Value
3.12-6.65-folde0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“contents of phytochelatins and glutathione were about 3.12-6.65-fold and 3.27-10.73-fold in leaves, against control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–1005 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cd stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–867 · show in text ↑
e2

“Oryza sativa L. seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 97–122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf glutathione reached 3.27–10.73-fold control under cadmium.

Taxon
Oryza sativa L.Oryza sativae2
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
Cd stresse1
Outcome
glutathionee0
Value
3.27-10.73-folde0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“contents of phytochelatins and glutathione were about 3.12-6.65-fold and 3.27-10.73-fold in leaves, against control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–1005 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cd stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–867 · show in text ↑
e2

“Oryza sativa L. seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 97–122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root phytochelatins reached 3.53–9.37-fold control under cadmium.

Taxon
Oryza sativa L.Oryza sativae2
Organ / stage
rootse0
Treatment
Cd stresse3
Outcome
phytochelatinse1
Value
3.53-9.37-folde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the corresponding values were about 3.53-9.37-fold and 1.41-5.11-fold in roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1011–1089 · show in text ↑
e1

“contents of phytochelatins and glutathione”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–932 · show in text ↑
e2

“Oryza sativa L. seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 97–122 · show in text ↑
e3

“Cd stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–867 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root glutathione reached 1.41–5.11-fold control under cadmium.

Taxon
Oryza sativa L.Oryza sativae2
Organ / stage
rootse0
Treatment
Cd stresse3
Outcome
glutathionee1
Value
1.41-5.11-folde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the corresponding values were about 3.53-9.37-fold and 1.41-5.11-fold in roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1011–1089 · show in text ↑
e1

“contents of phytochelatins and glutathione”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–932 · show in text ↑
e2

“Oryza sativa L. seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 97–122 · show in text ↑
e3

“Cd stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–867 · show in text ↑

cadmium atom · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

19 papers: 6 positive, 13 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

cadmium atom · molecular: metabolites · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

26 papers: 9 positive, 17 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

cadmium atom · physiology: oxidative · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 5 positive, 32 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

heavy metal · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

20 papers: 9 positive, 11 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

heavy metal · molecular: metabolites · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 7 positive, 14 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

pollution · physiology: oxidative · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.