Paper · 2011 · Genetika

Mode of inheritance of dry matter content in onion (Allium cepa L.) bulb

Nenad Pavlovic; Dejan Cvikic; Jasmina Zdravkovic; et al.

9
claims
19
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Onion dry matter content is very important in terms of processing. The study was undertaken in order to investigate dry matter content inheritance pattern in fresh onion bulb. Five divergent onion genotypes, originating from different geographical areas, have been crossed. Full diallel crossing method (without reciprocals) was applied in order to obtain F1 and F2 generation offspring. Field trial including parents and F1 and F2 hybrids was performed at the Institute for Vegetable Crops experimental plot, Smederevska Palanka. The trial was conducted in randomized blocks, with five replications. Intermediate inheritance pattern prevailed for both F1 and F2 generation. Additive genetic component value was higher than dominant for both F1 and F2 generation, which implies additive effect of genes. Hybrid combination PR x BB was characterized by the highest heterosis value (11.85%). Better general combining abilities were confirmed for three lines in comparison with other lines, whereas special combining abilities were significant for one F1 hybrid. Neither general nor special combining abilities were significant for F2 generation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intermediate inheritance of onion bulb dry matter content prevailed in F1.

Taxon
onion (Allium cepa L.)Allium cepat0
Material
F1e0
Organ / stage
bulbt0
Outcome
Intermediate inheritance patterne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Intermediate inheritance pattern prevailed for both F1 and F2 generation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–673 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion (Allium cepa L.) bulb”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–72 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intermediate inheritance of onion bulb dry matter content prevailed in F2.

Taxon
onion (Allium cepa L.)Allium cepat0
Material
F2e0
Organ / stage
bulbt0
Outcome
Intermediate inheritance patterne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Intermediate inheritance pattern prevailed for both F1 and F2 generation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–673 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion (Allium cepa L.) bulb”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–72 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The additive genetic component exceeded the dominant component in F1 onion progeny.

Taxon
onion (Allium cepa L.)Allium cepat0
Material
F1e0
Outcome
Additive genetic component valuee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
dominante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Additive genetic component value was higher than dominant for both F1 and F2 generation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–762 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–67 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The additive genetic component exceeded the dominant component in F2 onion progeny.

Taxon
onion (Allium cepa L.)Allium cepat0
Material
F2e0
Outcome
Additive genetic component valuee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
dominante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Additive genetic component value was higher than dominant for both F1 and F2 generation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–762 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–67 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Onion hybrid PR x BB had the highest heterosis, 11.85%.

Taxon
onion (Allium cepa L.)Allium cepat0
Material
PR x BBe0
Outcome
heterosise0
Direction
higheste0
Value
11.85%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Hybrid combination PR x BB was characterized by the highest heterosis value (11.85%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–888 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–67 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three onion lines had better general combining abilities than other lines.

Taxon
onion (Allium cepa L.)Allium cepat0
Material
three linese0
Outcome
general combining abilitiese0
Direction
Bettere0
Comparator
other linese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Better general combining abilities were confirmed for three lines in comparison with other lines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–986 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–67 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Special combining ability was significant for one F1 onion hybrid.

Taxon
onion (Allium cepa L.)Allium cepat0
Material
one F1 hybride0
Outcome
special combining abilitiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“special combining abilities were significant for one F1 hybrid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1058 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–67 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

General combining ability was not significant in the F2 onion generation.

Taxon
onion (Allium cepa L.)Allium cepat0
Material
F2 generatione0
Outcome
general combining abilitiese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Neither general nor special combining abilities were significant for F2 generation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1142 · show in text ↑
e1

“Better general combining abilities were confirmed for three lines in comparison with other lines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–986 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–67 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Special combining ability was not significant in the F2 onion generation.

Taxon
onion (Allium cepa L.)Allium cepat0
Material
F2 generatione0
Outcome
special combining abilitiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Neither general nor special combining abilities were significant for F2 generation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1142 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–67 · show in text ↑