Paper · 2010 · BMC Plant Biology

Expression profiling and integrative analysis of the CESA/CSL superfamily in rice

Lingqiang Wang; Kai Guo; Yu Li; et al.

12
claims
12
verbatim quotes
289
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The cellulose synthase and cellulose synthase-like gene superfamily (CESA/CSL) is proposed to encode enzymes for cellulose and non-cellulosic matrix polysaccharide synthesis in plants. Although the rice (Oryza sativa L.) genome has been sequenced for a few years, the global expression profiling patterns and functions of the OsCESA/CSL superfamily remain largely unknown. RESULTS: A total of 45 identified members of OsCESA/CSL were classified into two clusters based on phylogeny and motif constitution. Duplication events contributed largely to the expansion of this superfamily, with Cluster I and II mainly attributed to tandem and segmental duplication, respectively. With microarray data of 33 tissue samples covering the entire life cycle of rice, fairly high OsCESA gene expression and rather variable OsCSL expression were observed. While some members from each CSL family (A1, C9, D2, E1, F6 and H1) were expressed in all tissues examined, many of OsCSL genes were expressed in specific tissues (stamen and radicles). The expression pattern of OsCESA/CSL and OsBC1L which extensively co-expressed with OsCESA/CSL can be divided into three major groups with ten subgroups, each showing a distinct co-expression in tissues representing typically distinct cell wall constitutions. In particular, OsCESA1, -3 & -8 and OsCESA4, -7 & -9 were strongly co-expressed in tissues typical of primary and secondary cell walls, suggesting that they form as a cellulose synthase complex; these results are similar to the findings in Arabidopsis. OsCESA5/OsCESA6 is likely partially redundant with OsCESA3 for OsCESA complex organization in the specific tissues (plumule and radicle). Moreover, the phylogenetic comparison in rice, Arabidopsis and other species can provide clues for the prediction of orthologous gene expression patterns. CONCLUSIONS: The study characterized the CESA/CSL of rice using an integrated approach comprised of phylogeny, transcriptional profiling and co-expression analyses. These investigations revealed very useful clues on the major roles of CESA/CSL, their potentially functional complement and their associations for appropriate cell wall synthesis in higher plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Forty-five OsCESA/CSL members formed two clusters.

Gene
OsCESA/CSLe0
Outcome
classified into two clusterse0
Value
45 identified memberse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“A total of 45 identified members of OsCESA/CSL were classified into two clusters based on phylogeny and motif constitution.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 394–517 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Duplication events largely expanded the superfamily.

Outcome
expansion of this superfamilye0
Qualifier
Duplication eventse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Duplication events contributed largely to the expansion of this superfamily”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 518–593 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cluster I was mainly attributed to tandem duplication.

Outcome
Cluster Ie0
Qualifier
tandeme0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Cluster I and II mainly attributed to tandem and segmental duplication, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–685 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cluster II was mainly attributed to segmental duplication.

Outcome
IIe0
Qualifier
segmental duplicatione0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Cluster I and II mainly attributed to tandem and segmental duplication, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–685 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

OsCESA expression was fairly high.

Gene
OsCESAe0
Outcome
OsCESA gene expressione0
Direction
fairly highe0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“fairly high OsCESA gene expression and rather variable OsCSL expression were observed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–854 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

OsCSL expression varied considerably.

Gene
OsCSLe0
Outcome
OsCSL expressione0
Direction
rather variablee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“fairly high OsCESA gene expression and rather variable OsCSL expression were observed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–854 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Some CSL family members were expressed in all examined tissues.

Gene
CSLe0
Outcome
expressed in all tissues examinede0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“some members from each CSL family (A1, C9, D2, E1, F6 and H1) were expressed in all tissues examined”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–961 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Many OsCSL genes were tissue-specific in stamen and radicles.

Organ / stage
stamen and radiclese0
Gene
OsCSLe0
Outcome
expressed in specific tissuese0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“many of OsCSL genes were expressed in specific tissues (stamen and radicles).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 963–1040 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

OsCESA/CSL and OsBC1L expression separated into three major groups and ten subgroups.

Gene
OsCESA/CSLe0
Outcome
three major groups with ten subgroupse0
Value
ten subgroupse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The expression pattern of OsCESA/CSL and OsBC1L which extensively co-expressed with OsCESA/CSL can be divided into three major groups with ten subgroups”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1041–1193 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

OsCESA1, -3 and -8 were strongly coexpressed in primary-wall tissues.

Organ / stage
primarye0
Gene
OsCESA1e0
Outcome
strongly co-expressede0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“OsCESA1, -3 & -8 and OsCESA4, -7 & -9 were strongly co-expressed in tissues typical of primary and secondary cell walls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1316–1435 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

OsCESA4, -7 and -9 were strongly coexpressed in secondary-wall tissues.

Organ / stage
secondary cell wallse0
Gene
OsCESA4e0
Outcome
strongly co-expressede0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“OsCESA1, -3 & -8 and OsCESA4, -7 & -9 were strongly co-expressed in tissues typical of primary and secondary cell walls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1316–1435 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

OsCESA5/OsCESA6 likely partially overlaps OsCESA3 function in plumule and radicle.

Organ / stage
plumule and radiclee0
Gene
OsCESA5/OsCESA6e0
Outcome
partially redundant with OsCESA3e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“OsCESA5/OsCESA6 is likely partially redundant with OsCESA3 for OsCESA complex organization in the specific tissues (plumule and radicle).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1554–1691 · show in text ↑