Paper · 2013 · International Journal of Biodiversity and Conservation

Among and within population variation in growth dynamics and floral sex ratios in Inula racemosa; a critically endangered medicinal herb of N. W. Himalayas

Peerzada Arshid Shabir; Irshad A. Nawchoo; Aijaz A. Wani

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to determine the extent to which different morphological and reproductive characteristics of a critically endangered, Himalayan herb (Inula racemosa) varied along an altitudinal gradient. To this end, seven populations growing at different altitudes (1595 - 2800 m asl) across the Kashmir Himalaya were assessed. ANOVA expressed significant differences (P=0.05) in all growth parameters as a function of altitude. The highest difference between the populations was apparent in the stem height and in all populations patterns in the foliar and floral number and dimensions closely followed those in plant height. In four out of the seven populations, significant variation in floret number per head was detected among plants within all seven populations. Only 19-34% of variation was found within plants and in contrast 38-72% variation was found among plants. As compared to total ovule number per capitulum the species show low percentage of reproductive success (59-72% seed set). However, increasing altitude resulted in a decrease in relative and absolute allocation of biomass to reproductive structures in the form of decreasing dry weight of individual capitula as well as in the form of absolute declining of total number of capitula produced. There was also a trend for increased relative allocation to below-ground rhizome with increasing altitude, even though altitude did not affect absolute allocation to below-ground and vegetative structures. Key words: Altitude, floral sex ratio, growth, Inula racemosa, phenotypic variability, reproductive success.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth parameters differed significantly with altitude.

Taxon
Inula racemosaInula racemosat0
Outcome
all growth parameterse0
Setting
altitudee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Inula racemosa
Inula racemosa · TaxonHume Douglas · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ANOVA expressed significant differences (P=0.05) in all growth parameters as a function of altitude.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–450 · show in text ↑
t0

“Inula racemosa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–96 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem height showed the largest difference among populations.

Taxon
Inula racemosaInula racemosat0
Outcome
stem heighte0
Direction
highest differencee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Inula racemosa
Inula racemosa · TaxonHume Douglas · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest difference between the populations was apparent in the stem height”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 451–529 · show in text ↑
t0

“Inula racemosa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–96 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar and floral numbers and dimensions followed plant height patterns.

Taxon
Inula racemosaInula racemosat0
Outcome
foliar and floral number and dimensionse0
Comparator
plant heighte0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Inula racemosa
Inula racemosa · TaxonHume Douglas · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in all populations patterns in the foliar and floral number and dimensions closely followed those in plant height.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–648 · show in text ↑
t0

“Inula racemosa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–96 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Floret number varied significantly among plants in four populations.

Taxon
Inula racemosaInula racemosat0
Outcome
floret number per heade0
Value
four out of the seven populationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Inula racemosa
Inula racemosa · TaxonHume Douglas · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In four out of the seven populations, significant variation in floret number per head was detected among plants within all seven populations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–790 · show in text ↑
t0

“Inula racemosa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–96 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Within-plant variation was 19–34%.

Taxon
Inula racemosaInula racemosat0
Outcome
variatione0
Value
19-34%e0
Qualifier
within plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Inula racemosa
Inula racemosa · TaxonHume Douglas · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Only 19-34% of variation was found within plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–839 · show in text ↑
t0

“Inula racemosa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–96 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Among-plant variation was 38–72%.

Taxon
Inula racemosaInula racemosat0
Outcome
variatione0
Value
38-72%e0
Qualifier
among plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Inula racemosa
Inula racemosa · TaxonHume Douglas · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“38-72% variation was found among plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–895 · show in text ↑
t0

“Inula racemosa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–96 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed set was 59–72% of ovules per capitulum.

Taxon
Inula racemosaInula racemosat0
Outcome
seed sete0
Value
59-72%e0
Comparator
total ovule number per capitulume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Inula racemosa
Inula racemosa · TaxonHume Douglas · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“As compared to total ovule number per capitulum the species show low percentage of reproductive success (59-72% seed set).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–1019 · show in text ↑
t0

“Inula racemosa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–96 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Individual capitulum dry weight decreased with increasing altitude.

Taxon
Inula racemosaInula racemosat0
Outcome
dry weight of individual capitulae0
Direction
decreasinge0
Setting
altitudee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Inula racemosa
Inula racemosa · TaxonHume Douglas · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing altitude resulted in a decrease in relative and absolute allocation of biomass to reproductive structures in the form of decreasing dry weight of individual capitula”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1029–1205 · show in text ↑
t0

“Inula racemosa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–96 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total capitula number declined with increasing altitude.

Taxon
Inula racemosaInula racemosat0
Outcome
total number of capitula producede0
Direction
declininge0
Setting
altitudee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Inula racemosa
Inula racemosa · TaxonHume Douglas · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing altitude resulted in a decrease in relative and absolute allocation of biomass to reproductive structures in the form of decreasing dry weight of individual capitula as well as in the form of absolute declining of total number of capitula produced.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1029–1288 · show in text ↑
t0

“Inula racemosa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–96 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative allocation to rhizomes tended to increase with altitude.

Taxon
Inula racemosaInula racemosat0
Outcome
relative allocation to below-ground rhizomee0
Direction
increasede0
Setting
altitudee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Inula racemosa
Inula racemosa · TaxonHume Douglas · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was also a trend for increased relative allocation to below-ground rhizome with increasing altitude”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1289–1394 · show in text ↑
t0

“Inula racemosa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–96 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Altitude did not affect absolute allocation to below-ground and vegetative structures.

Taxon
Inula racemosaInula racemosat0
Outcome
absolute allocation to below-ground and vegetative structurese0
Direction
did not affecte0
Setting
altitudee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Inula racemosa
Inula racemosa · TaxonHume Douglas · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“altitude did not affect absolute allocation to below-ground and vegetative structures.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1408–1494 · show in text ↑
t0

“Inula racemosa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–96 · show in text ↑