Paper · 1976 · Annals of Applied Biology

Effect of temperature, light and host on prepenetration development of Puccinia graminis avenae and Puccinia coronata avenae

J. K. KOCHMAN; J. F. BROWN

11
claims
20
verbatim quotes
27
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SUMMARY The influence of temperature and light on prepenetration development of single and mixed isolates of Puccinia graminis avenae and Puccinia coronata avenae was studied on 0–2% water agar and on leaves of three oat cultivars and on three non‐cultivated species of Avena. Germination of uredospores of P. graminis avenae and P. coronata avenae occurred best at 10–30 o C and at 20 o C respectively. The optimum temperature for germ‐tube growth and for appressorial formation was 20 o C for both rusts. An inverse relationship was observed between light intensity and prepenetration development with maximal germination of uredospores, germ‐tube growth and appressorial formation occurring in darkness. Under optimum conditions maximum percentage germination and appressorium formation of both rusts was attained within 4 and 12 h after inoculation respectively. The proportion of germinated uredospores of crown rust which gave rise to appressoria was about twice that observed for stem rust. No significant differences were observed in prepenetration development between the single and mixed race inocula of the two rusts. Although germination of uredospores was significantly greater on water agar than on oat leaves, there were no significant differences in prepenetration development of the rusts on the various oat cultivars and species examined. Consequently, the data failed to indicate the presence of resistance mechanisms operating during the prepenetration phase of the infection process on the cultivars and species examined.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Puccinia graminis avenae uredospores germinated best at 10–30 o C.

Interactor
P. graminis avenaePuccinia graminise0pathogen
Outcome
Germination of uredospores of P. graminis avenaee0
Direction
beste0
Value
10–30 o Ce0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Puccinia graminis
Puccinia graminis · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Germination of uredospores of P. graminis avenae and P. coronata avenae occurred best at 10–30 o C and at 20 o C respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 277–402 · show in text ↑
t0

“leaves of three oat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 201–230 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Puccinia coronata avenae uredospores germinated best at 20 o C.

Interactor
P. coronata avenaePuccinia coronatae0pathogen
Outcome
Germination of uredospores of P. graminis avenae and P. coronata avenaee0
Direction
beste0
Value
20 o Ce0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Puccinia coronata
Puccinia coronata · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAlan Rockefeller · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Germination of uredospores of P. graminis avenae and P. coronata avenae occurred best at 10–30 o C and at 20 o C respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 277–402 · show in text ↑
t0

“leaves of three oat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 201–230 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both rusts had optimal germ-tube growth and appressorial formation at 20 o C.

Outcome
germ‐tube growth and for appressorial formatione0
Direction
optimume0
Value
20 o Ce0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The optimum temperature for germ‐tube growth and for appressorial formation was 20 o C for both rusts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 404–505 · show in text ↑
t0

“leaves of three oat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 201–230 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing light intensity was inversely related to prepenetration development, with maximal germination, germ-tube growth and appressorial formation in darkness.

Outcome
prepenetration developmente0
Direction
inversee0
Setting
darknesse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An inverse relationship was observed between light intensity and prepenetration development with maximal germination of uredospores, germ‐tube growth and appressorial formation occurring in darkness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 507–705 · show in text ↑
t0

“leaves of three oat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 201–230 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under optimum conditions, both rusts reached maximum uredospore germination within 4 h after inoculation.

Outcome
maximum percentage germinatione0
Direction
maximume0
Qualifier
within 4 and 12 h after inoculation respectivelye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under optimum conditions maximum percentage germination and appressorium formation of both rusts was attained within 4 and 12 h after inoculation respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–865 · show in text ↑
t0

“leaves of three oat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 201–230 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under optimum conditions, both rusts reached maximum appressorium formation within 12 h after inoculation.

Outcome
appressorium formatione0
Direction
maximume0
Qualifier
within 4 and 12 h after inoculation respectivelye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under optimum conditions maximum percentage germination and appressorium formation of both rusts was attained within 4 and 12 h after inoculation respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–865 · show in text ↑
t0

“leaves of three oat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 201–230 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The proportion of germinated crown-rust uredospores producing appressoria was about twice that for stem rust.

Outcome
proportion of germinated uredospores of crown rust which gave rise to appressoriae0
Direction
twicee0
Comparator
stem ruste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The proportion of germinated uredospores of crown rust which gave rise to appressoria was about twice that observed for stem rust”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 867–996 · show in text ↑
t0

“leaves of three oat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 201–230 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Single and mixed race inocula did not differ significantly in prepenetration development.

Treatment
mixed race inoculae0
Outcome
prepenetration developmente0
Direction
No significant differencese0
Comparator
singlee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No significant differences were observed in prepenetration development between the single and mixed race inocula of the two rusts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 998–1127 · show in text ↑
t0

“leaves of three oat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 201–230 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rust uredospore germination was significantly greater on water agar than oat leaves.

Outcome
germination of uredosporese0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
oat leavese0
Setting
water agare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“germination of uredospores was significantly greater on water agar than on oat leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1138–1223 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rust prepenetration development did not differ significantly among the examined oat cultivars and species.

Outcome
prepenetration development of the rustse0
Direction
no significant differencese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there were no significant differences in prepenetration development of the rusts on the various oat cultivars and species examined”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1225–1355 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The data did not indicate prepenetration resistance mechanisms in the oat cultivars or species examined.

Outcome
resistance mechanisms operating during the prepenetration phase of the infection processe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the data failed to indicate the presence of resistance mechanisms operating during the prepenetration phase of the infection process on the cultivars and species examined”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1371–1541 · show in text ↑
t0

“leaves of three oat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 201–230 · show in text ↑

inoculation · growth · Avena sativa (oats)Results differ

33 papers: 30 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.