Paper · 2015 · Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences

Dry matter yield and forage quality traits of oat ( Avena sativa L.) under integrative use of microbial and synthetic source of nitrogen

M. Bilal; M. Ayub; M. Tariq; et al.

18
claims
37
verbatim quotes
34
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

The natural microbes are potential contributor to build up soil nitrogen through transformation of molecular nitrogen to plant available forms. Therefore, in the present study, we investigated the contribution of biofertilizer to reduce the synthetic nitrogen application without deteriorating the yield and forage quality . The supplementary nitrogen rates included 0, 40, 80 and 120 kg ha −1 and the seed inoculation was carried out with the mixture of Azospirillum + Azotobacter spp. The experiment was laid out in randomized complete block design with factorial arrangement. The results indicated that organic matter contents and ether extractable fat were negatively associated with both nitrogen and inoculation factors. The inoculation produced 6.58%, 9.58%, 2.51%, 16.94%, 10.26%, 17.59%, 14.02%, 33.81% and 66.18% more No. tillers , plant height, leaf to stem ratio, dry matter yield, mineral matter contents, crude fibre, crude protein, crude protein yield and total digestible crude protein yield, respectively over uninoculation. The interactive effects indicated that inoculation alone without nitrogen application produced 19.16% and 6.87% more dry matter yield and crude protein (%), respectively. The beneficiary effects of biofertilizers on growth and dry matter of oat were more pronounced at intermediate level of inorganic nitrogen which was gradually decreased at higher nitrogen levels. The CP, CPY and DCPY achieved with inoculation alone were statistically equivalent to plots fertilized with 0 and 40 kg N ha −1 . It is clear that plots sown with inoculated seeds must be fertilized with 80 kg N to produce higher dry matter and economic returns. However, the highest protein contents in dry matter were recorded with highest fertilization level along with inoculation. By giving due attention to stimulatory effects of bacterial species in the present study, it is therefore, recommended to integrate the use of biofertilizers with supplemental dose of synthetic nitrogen source to sustain crop production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic matter content was negatively associated with nitrogen and inoculation.

Treatment
nitrogen and inoculation factorse0
Outcome
organic matter contentse0
Direction
negativelye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“organic matter contents and ether extractable fat were negatively associated with both nitrogen and inoculation factors”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 606–725 · show in text ↑
t0

“oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–49 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ether extractable fat was negatively associated with nitrogen and inoculation.

Treatment
nitrogen and inoculation factorse0
Outcome
ether extractable fate0
Direction
negativelye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“organic matter contents and ether extractable fat were negatively associated with both nitrogen and inoculation factors”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 606–725 · show in text ↑
t0

“oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation increased tiller number by 6.58%.

Treatment
inoculatione0
Interactor
Azospirillum + Azotobacter spp.e1symbiont
Outcome
No. tillerse0
Direction
moree0
Value
6.58%e0
Comparator
uninoculatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The inoculation produced 6.58%, 9.58%, 2.51%, 16.94%, 10.26%, 17.59%, 14.02%, 33.81% and 66.18% more No. tillers , plant height, leaf to stem ratio, dry matter yield, mineral matter contents, crude fibre, crude protein, crude protein yield and total digestible crude protein yield, respectively over uninoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–1040 · show in text ↑
e1

“Azospirillum + Azotobacter spp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 455–486 · show in text ↑
t0

“oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation increased plant height by 9.58%.

Treatment
inoculatione0
Interactor
Azospirillum + Azotobacter spp.e1symbiont
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
moree0
Value
9.58%e0
Comparator
uninoculatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The inoculation produced 6.58%, 9.58%, 2.51%, 16.94%, 10.26%, 17.59%, 14.02%, 33.81% and 66.18% more No. tillers , plant height, leaf to stem ratio, dry matter yield, mineral matter contents, crude fibre, crude protein, crude protein yield and total digestible crude protein yield, respectively over uninoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–1040 · show in text ↑
e1

“Azospirillum + Azotobacter spp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 455–486 · show in text ↑
t0

“oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation increased leaf-to-stem ratio by 2.51%.

Treatment
inoculatione0
Outcome
leaf to stem ratioe0
Direction
moree0
Value
2.51%e0
Comparator
uninoculatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The inoculation produced 6.58%, 9.58%, 2.51%, 16.94%, 10.26%, 17.59%, 14.02%, 33.81% and 66.18% more No. tillers , plant height, leaf to stem ratio, dry matter yield, mineral matter contents, crude fibre, crude protein, crude protein yield and total digestible crude protein yield, respectively over uninoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–1040 · show in text ↑
t0

“oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation increased dry matter yield by 16.94%.

Treatment
inoculatione0
Outcome
dry matter yielde0
Direction
moree0
Value
16.94%e0
Comparator
uninoculatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The inoculation produced 6.58%, 9.58%, 2.51%, 16.94%, 10.26%, 17.59%, 14.02%, 33.81% and 66.18% more No. tillers , plant height, leaf to stem ratio, dry matter yield, mineral matter contents, crude fibre, crude protein, crude protein yield and total digestible crude protein yield, respectively over uninoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–1040 · show in text ↑
t0

“oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation increased mineral matter content by 10.26%.

Treatment
inoculatione0
Outcome
mineral matter contentse0
Direction
moree0
Value
10.26%e0
Comparator
uninoculatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The inoculation produced 6.58%, 9.58%, 2.51%, 16.94%, 10.26%, 17.59%, 14.02%, 33.81% and 66.18% more No. tillers , plant height, leaf to stem ratio, dry matter yield, mineral matter contents, crude fibre, crude protein, crude protein yield and total digestible crude protein yield, respectively over uninoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–1040 · show in text ↑
t0

“oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation increased crude fibre by 17.59%.

Treatment
inoculatione0
Outcome
crude fibree0
Direction
moree0
Value
17.59%e0
Comparator
uninoculatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The inoculation produced 6.58%, 9.58%, 2.51%, 16.94%, 10.26%, 17.59%, 14.02%, 33.81% and 66.18% more No. tillers , plant height, leaf to stem ratio, dry matter yield, mineral matter contents, crude fibre, crude protein, crude protein yield and total digestible crude protein yield, respectively over uninoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–1040 · show in text ↑
t0

“oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation increased crude protein by 14.02%.

Treatment
inoculatione0
Outcome
crude proteine0
Direction
moree0
Value
14.02%e0
Comparator
uninoculatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The inoculation produced 6.58%, 9.58%, 2.51%, 16.94%, 10.26%, 17.59%, 14.02%, 33.81% and 66.18% more No. tillers , plant height, leaf to stem ratio, dry matter yield, mineral matter contents, crude fibre, crude protein, crude protein yield and total digestible crude protein yield, respectively over uninoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–1040 · show in text ↑
t0

“oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation increased crude protein yield by 33.81%.

Treatment
inoculatione0
Outcome
crude protein yielde0
Direction
moree0
Value
33.81%e0
Comparator
uninoculatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The inoculation produced 6.58%, 9.58%, 2.51%, 16.94%, 10.26%, 17.59%, 14.02%, 33.81% and 66.18% more No. tillers , plant height, leaf to stem ratio, dry matter yield, mineral matter contents, crude fibre, crude protein, crude protein yield and total digestible crude protein yield, respectively over uninoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–1040 · show in text ↑
t0

“oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation increased total digestible crude protein yield by 66.18%.

Treatment
inoculatione0
Outcome
total digestible crude protein yielde0
Direction
moree0
Value
66.18%e0
Comparator
uninoculatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The inoculation produced 6.58%, 9.58%, 2.51%, 16.94%, 10.26%, 17.59%, 14.02%, 33.81% and 66.18% more No. tillers , plant height, leaf to stem ratio, dry matter yield, mineral matter contents, crude fibre, crude protein, crude protein yield and total digestible crude protein yield, respectively over uninoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–1040 · show in text ↑
t0

“oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation without nitrogen increased dry matter yield by 19.16%.

Treatment
inoculation alone without nitrogen applicatione0
Outcome
dry matter yielde0
Direction
moree0
Value
19.16%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculation alone without nitrogen application produced 19.16% and 6.87% more dry matter yield and crude protein (%), respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1081–1211 · show in text ↑
t0

“oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation without nitrogen increased crude protein by 6.87%.

Treatment
inoculation alone without nitrogen applicatione0
Outcome
crude protein (%)e0
Direction
moree0
Value
6.87%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculation alone without nitrogen application produced 19.16% and 6.87% more dry matter yield and crude protein (%), respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1081–1211 · show in text ↑
t0

“oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–49 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofertilizer effects on growth and dry matter were strongest at intermediate nitrogen and declined at higher nitrogen.

Treatment
biofertilizerse0
Outcome
growth and dry matter of oate0
Direction
more pronouncede0
Qualifier
intermediate level of inorganic nitrogene0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“beneficiary effects of biofertilizers on growth and dry matter of oat were more pronounced at intermediate level of inorganic nitrogen which was gradually decreased at higher nitrogen levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1217–1407 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Crude protein, crude protein yield and digestible crude protein yield from inoculation alone were statistically equivalent to fertilized plots at 0 and 40 kg N ha−1.

Treatment
inoculation alonee0
Outcome
CP, CPY and DCPYe0
Direction
statistically equivalente0
Comparator
plots fertilized with 0 and 40 kg N ha −1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The CP, CPY and DCPY achieved with inoculation alone were statistically equivalent to plots fertilized with 0 and 40 kg N ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1409–1536 · show in text ↑
t0

“oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–49 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that inoculated oat should receive 80 kg N for higher dry matter and economic returns.

Treatment
80 kg Ne0
Outcome
fertilized with 80 kg Ne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plots sown with inoculated seeds must be fertilized with 80 kg N to produce higher dry matter and economic returns”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1556–1670 · show in text ↑
t0

“oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–49 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest protein content in dry matter occurred with the highest fertilization level plus inoculation.

Treatment
highest fertilization level along with inoculatione0
Outcome
protein contents in dry mattere0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest protein contents in dry matter were recorded with highest fertilization level along with inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1681–1793 · show in text ↑
t0

“oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–49 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend combining biofertilizers with supplemental synthetic nitrogen to sustain crop production.

Outcome
integrate the use of biofertilizers with supplemental dose of synthetic nitrogen sourcee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“recommended to integrate the use of biofertilizers with supplemental dose of synthetic nitrogen source to sustain crop production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1902–2031 · show in text ↑
t0

“oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–49 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · quality: protein · Avena sativa (oats)Results differ

26 papers: 24 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction

This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

inoculation · growth · Avena sativa (oats)Results differ

33 papers: 30 positive, 3 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

inoculation · quality: protein · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

inoculation · quality: grain · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

inoculation · yield · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

35 papers: 26 positive, 9 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

116 papers: 105 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 105 in the opposite direction

This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

112 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.