Abstract
This study aimed to determine the effects of the addition of different doses of Lactobacillus brevis to oat silage on the physical and chemical properties, aerobic stability, in vitro organic matter digestibility, and energy value of the silage. In the study, the treatment groups were oat control (OC), 1x106 (Lb6), 1x108 (Lb8) and 1x109 cfu/kg dry matter (Lb9) L. brevis inoculated oats. Inoculation of L. brevis into oat silage increased the number of lactic acid bacteria and decreased the pH of the silage at the time of opening. This inoculation decreased the organic matter, acid detergent fiber and neutral detergent fiber contents of the silages at opening compared to those of OC, while increasing the dry matter and crude protein contents. The L. brevis inoculation into oat silage decreased the pH values and yeast counts on the fifth day after opening the silages compared to OC, without affecting the amount of CO2 production and mold count. The inoculation did not affect the in vitro organic matter digestibility and metabolizable energy value of silage; but increased the net energy lactation value compared to OC. When the L. brevis doses are evaluated independently, it can be said that 1*108 and 1*109 cfu/kg DM doses contributed more effectively to oat silage, so any of these doses can be preferred.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
L. brevis inoculation increased the number of lactic acid bacteria in oat silage compared with the oat control.
- Taxon
- oat
Avena sativae0 - Treatment
- Inoculation of L. brevis into oat silagee1
- Outcome
- number of lactic acid bacteriae1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Comparator
- OCe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the treatment groups were oat control (OC), 1x106 (Lb6), 1x108 (Lb8) and 1x109 cfu/kg dry matter (Lb9) L. brevis inoculated oats”
e1“Inoculation of L. brevis into oat silage increased the number of lactic acid bacteria and decreased the pH of the silage at the time of opening”
Claim · model-written summary
L. brevis inoculation decreased the pH of the oat silage at the time of opening compared with the oat control.
- Taxon
- oatAvena sativae0
- Treatment
- Inoculation of L. brevis into oat silagee1
- Outcome
- pH of the silage at the time of openinge1
- Direction
- decreasede1
- Comparator
- OCe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the treatment groups were oat control (OC), 1x106 (Lb6), 1x108 (Lb8) and 1x109 cfu/kg dry matter (Lb9) L. brevis inoculated oats”
e1“Inoculation of L. brevis into oat silage increased the number of lactic acid bacteria and decreased the pH of the silage at the time of opening”
Claim · model-written summary
Inoculation decreased the organic matter, acid detergent fiber and neutral detergent fiber contents of oat silage at opening compared with OC.
- Taxon
- oatAvena sativae0
- Treatment
- inoculatione2
- Outcome
- organic matter, acid detergent fiber and neutral detergent fiber contentse2
- Direction
- decreasede2
- Comparator
- OCe2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the treatment groups were oat control (OC), 1x106 (Lb6), 1x108 (Lb8) and 1x109 cfu/kg dry matter (Lb9) L. brevis inoculated oats”
e2“This inoculation decreased the organic matter, acid detergent fiber and neutral detergent fiber contents of the silages at opening compared to those of OC, while increasing the dry matter and crude protein contents”
Claim · model-written summary
Inoculation increased the dry matter and crude protein contents of oat silage at opening compared with OC.
- Taxon
- oatAvena sativae0
- Treatment
- inoculatione2
- Outcome
- dry matter and crude protein contentse2
- Direction
- increasinge2
- Comparator
- OCe2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the treatment groups were oat control (OC), 1x106 (Lb6), 1x108 (Lb8) and 1x109 cfu/kg dry matter (Lb9) L. brevis inoculated oats”
e2“This inoculation decreased the organic matter, acid detergent fiber and neutral detergent fiber contents of the silages at opening compared to those of OC, while increasing the dry matter and crude protein contents”
Claim · model-written summary
L. brevis inoculation decreased the pH values and yeast counts of oat silage on the fifth day after opening compared with OC.
- Taxon
- oatAvena sativae0
- Treatment
- L. brevis inoculatione3
- Outcome
- pH values and yeast countse3
- Direction
- decreasede3
- Qualifier
- on the fifth day after openinge3
- Comparator
- OCe3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the treatment groups were oat control (OC), 1x106 (Lb6), 1x108 (Lb8) and 1x109 cfu/kg dry matter (Lb9) L. brevis inoculated oats”
e3“The L. brevis inoculation into oat silage decreased the pH values and yeast counts on the fifth day after opening the silages compared to OC”
Claim · model-written summary
L. brevis inoculation did not affect CO2 production or mold count of oat silage.
- Taxon
- oatAvena sativae0
- Treatment
- L. brevis inoculatione3
- Outcome
- amount of CO2 production and mold counte4
- Direction
- without affectinge4
- Comparator
- OCe3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the treatment groups were oat control (OC), 1x106 (Lb6), 1x108 (Lb8) and 1x109 cfu/kg dry matter (Lb9) L. brevis inoculated oats”
e3“The L. brevis inoculation into oat silage decreased the pH values and yeast counts on the fifth day after opening the silages compared to OC”
e4“without affecting the amount of CO2 production and mold count”
Claim · model-written summary
L. brevis inoculation did not affect the in vitro organic matter digestibility or metabolizable energy value of oat silage.
- Taxon
- oatAvena sativae0
- Treatment
- inoculatione5
- Outcome
- in vitro organic matter digestibility and metabolizable energy valuee5
- Direction
- did not affecte5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the treatment groups were oat control (OC), 1x106 (Lb6), 1x108 (Lb8) and 1x109 cfu/kg dry matter (Lb9) L. brevis inoculated oats”
e5“The inoculation did not affect the in vitro organic matter digestibility and metabolizable energy value of silage”
Claim · model-written summary
L. brevis inoculation increased the net energy lactation value of oat silage compared with OC.
- Taxon
- oatAvena sativae0
- Treatment
- inoculatione5
- Outcome
- net energy lactation valuee6
- Direction
- increasede6
- Comparator
- OCe6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the treatment groups were oat control (OC), 1x106 (Lb6), 1x108 (Lb8) and 1x109 cfu/kg dry matter (Lb9) L. brevis inoculated oats”
e5“The inoculation did not affect the in vitro organic matter digestibility and metabolizable energy value of silage”
e6“but increased the net energy lactation value compared to OC”
Claim · model-written summary
The 1*10(8) and 1*10(9) cfu/kg DM L. brevis doses contributed more effectively to oat silage than the other doses when evaluated independently.
- Taxon
- oatAvena sativae0
- Treatment
- 1*108 and 1*109 cfu/kg DMe7
- Outcome
- oat silagee7
- Direction
- more effectivelye7
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the treatment groups were oat control (OC), 1x106 (Lb6), 1x108 (Lb8) and 1x109 cfu/kg dry matter (Lb9) L. brevis inoculated oats”
e7“When the L. brevis doses are evaluated independently, it can be said that 1*108 and 1*109 cfu/kg DM doses contributed more effectively to oat silage, so any of these doses can be preferred”
Claim · model-written summary
Any of the 1*10(8) or 1*10(9) cfu/kg DM L. brevis doses can be preferred for oat silage.
- Taxon
- oatAvena sativae0
- Outcome
- any of these dosese7
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the treatment groups were oat control (OC), 1x106 (Lb6), 1x108 (Lb8) and 1x109 cfu/kg dry matter (Lb9) L. brevis inoculated oats”
e7“When the L. brevis doses are evaluated independently, it can be said that 1*108 and 1*109 cfu/kg DM doses contributed more effectively to oat silage, so any of these doses can be preferred”
The same questions in other papers
inoculation · quality: protein · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
inoculation · quality: grain · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →inoculation · molecular: metabolites · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →inoculation · soil: chemistry · Avena sativa (oats)Results agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →processing · molecular: metabolites · Avena sativa (oats)Results agree
6 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.