Intervention effectmodel-written summary

L. brevis inoculation decreased the pH of the oat silage at the time of opening compared with the oat control.

A claim from Effects of Different Doses of Lactobacillus brevis Addition to Oat (Avena sativa L.) Silage on Physical and Chemical Properties, Aerobic Stability, in Vitro Organic Matter Digestibility and Energy Value of Silage · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

L. brevis inoculation decreased the pH of the oat silage at the time of opening compared with the oat control.

Treatment
Inoculation of L. brevis into oat silagee1
Outcome
pH of the silage at the time of openinge1
Direction
decreasede1
Comparator
OCe0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the treatment groups were oat control (OC), 1x106 (Lb6), 1x108 (Lb8) and 1x109 cfu/kg dry matter (Lb9) L. brevis inoculated oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–388
e1

“Inoculation of L. brevis into oat silage increased the number of lactic acid bacteria and decreased the pH of the silage at the time of opening”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–533

Title

Effects of Different Doses of Lactobacillus brevis Addition to Oat (Avena sativa L.) Silage on Physical and Chemical Properties, Aerobic Stability, in Vitro Organic Matter Digestibility and Energy Value of Silage

Hayrettin Çayıroğlu Turkish Journal of Agriculture - Food Science and Technology 2025. doi:10.24925/turjaf.v13i4.1008-1014.7428

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-c5ae8e8e4bc71fc2fcd824a7f9c3e361aee3881dbbd23770b9e1372a90fbefac · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

inoculation · soil: chemistry · Avena sativa (oats)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.