Paper · 2001 · Indian Journal of Agronomy

Integrated nitrogen management in fodder oats (Avena sativa) in hot arid ecosystem of Rajasthan

K.C. SHARMA

15
claims
30
verbatim quotes
7
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during rabi of 2006-07 and 2007-08 at Bikaner to find out the effect of dif- ferent levels of nitrogen (0, 50, 100 and 150 kglha), biofertilizer (uninoculated and inoculated with Azotobacter) and sheep manure (0 and 10 Vha) on performance of fodder oats (Avena sativa L). Results revealed that 150 kg Nlha significantly increased the growth attributes leading to higher dry matter (11 .I3 Vha) and crude protein yields (988.7 kglha). Seed inoculation with Azotobacter increased the dry matter and crude protein yields by 5.93 and 7.00% over uninoculated control. Sheep manure @ 10 Vha significantly increased the green fodder, dry mat- ter, and crude protein yields to the extent of 21, 22.1 and 26.0% respectively over no sheep manure. Interaction effect of nitrogen and sheep manure was significant and dry matter yields recorded at 100 kg Nlha alongwith 10 t sheep manurelha and 150 kg Nlha alone were at par. Highest values of net returns (Rs 23,285/ha), net B:C ratio (1.00), N, P and K uptake, energy responsiveness (8.32 MJIRe) were recorded at 150 kg Nlha. .However, maxi- mum values of energy ratio (8.26) and energy productivity (458.9 g1MJ) were obtained with 100 kg Nlha, whereas, highest values of agronomic N-use efficiency (43.9 kg dmlkg-N applied) and physiological N-use effi- ciency (68.7 kg dmlkg N uptake) were recorded with 50 kg Nlha. Application of Azotobacter inoculation and sheep manure registered higher values of above traits than their respective control except agronomic and physi- ological N-use efficiencies, where control treatment recorded greater values. The residual soil organic carbon and available N contents were significantly influenced with application of nitrogen and sheep manure. The re- sults show that nitrogen @ 100 kglha alongwith Azotobacter inoculation and sheep manure @ 10 Vha may be applied for higher and quality fodder of oats.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

150 kg N per ha significantly increased oat growth attributes.

Taxon
Avena sativa LAvena sativae1
Treatment
150 kg Nlhae0
Outcome
growth attributese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results revealed that 150 kg Nlha significantly increased the growth attributes leading to higher dry matter (11 .I3 Vha) and crude protein yields (988.7 kglha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 305–465 · show in text ↑
e1

“performance of fodder oats (Avena sativa L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–303 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

150 kg N per ha gave higher dry matter yield (11 .I3 Vha).

Taxon
Avena sativa LAvena sativae1
Treatment
150 kg Nlhae0
Outcome
dry mattere0
Direction
highere0
Value
11 .I3 Vhae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results revealed that 150 kg Nlha significantly increased the growth attributes leading to higher dry matter (11 .I3 Vha) and crude protein yields (988.7 kglha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 305–465 · show in text ↑
e1

“performance of fodder oats (Avena sativa L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–303 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

150 kg N per ha gave higher crude protein yield (988.7 kg/ha).

Taxon
Avena sativa LAvena sativae1
Treatment
150 kg Nlhae0
Outcome
crude protein yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Value
988.7 kglhae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results revealed that 150 kg Nlha significantly increased the growth attributes leading to higher dry matter (11 .I3 Vha) and crude protein yields (988.7 kglha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 305–465 · show in text ↑
e1

“performance of fodder oats (Avena sativa L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–303 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed inoculation with Azotobacter increased dry matter yield by 5.93% over uninoculated control.

Taxon
Avena sativa LAvena sativae1
Treatment
Seed inoculation with Azotobactere3
Interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere3symbiont
Outcome
dry mattere3
Direction
increasede3
Value
5.93e3
Comparator
uninoculated controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Seed inoculation with Azotobacter increased the dry matter and crude protein yields by 5.93 and 7.00% over uninoculated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 467–594 · show in text ↑
e1

“performance of fodder oats (Avena sativa L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–303 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed inoculation with Azotobacter increased crude protein yield by 7.00% over uninoculated control.

Taxon
Avena sativa LAvena sativae1
Treatment
Seed inoculation with Azotobactere3
Interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere3symbiont
Outcome
crude protein yieldse3
Direction
increasede3
Value
7.00%e3
Comparator
uninoculated controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Seed inoculation with Azotobacter increased the dry matter and crude protein yields by 5.93 and 7.00% over uninoculated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 467–594 · show in text ↑
e1

“performance of fodder oats (Avena sativa L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–303 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sheep manure at 10 t/ha significantly increased green fodder yield by 21% over no sheep manure.

Taxon
Avena sativa LAvena sativae1
Treatment
Sheep manure @ 10 Vhae4
Outcome
green foddere4
Direction
increasede4
Value
21e4
Comparator
no sheep manuree4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Sheep manure @ 10 Vha significantly increased the green fodder, dry mat- ter, and crude protein yields to the extent of 21, 22.1 and 26.0% respectively over no sheep manure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–768 · show in text ↑
e1

“performance of fodder oats (Avena sativa L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–303 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sheep manure at 10 t/ha significantly increased dry matter yield by 22.1% over no sheep manure.

Taxon
Avena sativa LAvena sativae1
Treatment
Sheep manure @ 10 Vhae4
Outcome
dry mat- tere4
Direction
increasede4
Value
22.1e4
Comparator
no sheep manuree4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Sheep manure @ 10 Vha significantly increased the green fodder, dry mat- ter, and crude protein yields to the extent of 21, 22.1 and 26.0% respectively over no sheep manure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–768 · show in text ↑
e1

“performance of fodder oats (Avena sativa L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–303 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sheep manure at 10 t/ha significantly increased crude protein yield by 26.0% over no sheep manure.

Taxon
Avena sativa LAvena sativae1
Treatment
Sheep manure @ 10 Vhae4
Outcome
crude protein yieldse4
Direction
increasede4
Value
26.0%e4
Comparator
no sheep manuree4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Sheep manure @ 10 Vha significantly increased the green fodder, dry mat- ter, and crude protein yields to the extent of 21, 22.1 and 26.0% respectively over no sheep manure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–768 · show in text ↑
e1

“performance of fodder oats (Avena sativa L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–303 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry matter yields at 100 kg N with 10 t sheep manure per ha and at 150 kg N alone were at par.

Taxon
Avena sativa LAvena sativae1
Treatment
100 kg Nlha alongwith 10 t sheep manurelhae5
Outcome
dry matter yieldse5
Qualifier
Interaction effect of nitrogen and sheep manure was significante5
Comparator
150 kg Nlha alonee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Interaction effect of nitrogen and sheep manure was significant and dry matter yields recorded at 100 kg Nlha alongwith 10 t sheep manurelha and 150 kg Nlha alone were at par”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–944 · show in text ↑
e1

“performance of fodder oats (Avena sativa L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–303 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Net returns were highest at 150 kg N per ha.

Taxon
Avena sativa LAvena sativae1
Treatment
150 kg Nlhae6
Outcome
net returnse6
Direction
Higheste6
Value
Rs 23,285/hae6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Highest values of net returns (Rs 23,285/ha), net B:C ratio (1.00), N, P and K uptake, energy responsiveness (8.32 MJIRe) were recorded at 150 kg Nlha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1096 · show in text ↑
e1

“performance of fodder oats (Avena sativa L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–303 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Net B:C ratio was highest at 150 kg N per ha.

Taxon
Avena sativa LAvena sativae1
Treatment
150 kg Nlhae6
Outcome
net B:C ratioe6
Direction
Higheste6
Value
1.00e6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Highest values of net returns (Rs 23,285/ha), net B:C ratio (1.00), N, P and K uptake, energy responsiveness (8.32 MJIRe) were recorded at 150 kg Nlha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1096 · show in text ↑
e1

“performance of fodder oats (Avena sativa L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–303 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Energy responsiveness was highest at 150 kg N per ha.

Taxon
Avena sativa LAvena sativae1
Treatment
150 kg Nlhae6
Outcome
energy responsivenesse6
Direction
Higheste6
Value
8.32 MJIRee6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Highest values of net returns (Rs 23,285/ha), net B:C ratio (1.00), N, P and K uptake, energy responsiveness (8.32 MJIRe) were recorded at 150 kg Nlha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1096 · show in text ↑
e1

“performance of fodder oats (Avena sativa L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–303 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N, P and K uptake were highest at 150 kg N per ha.

Taxon
Avena sativa LAvena sativae1
Treatment
150 kg Nlhae6
Outcome
N, P and K uptakee6
Direction
Higheste6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Highest values of net returns (Rs 23,285/ha), net B:C ratio (1.00), N, P and K uptake, energy responsiveness (8.32 MJIRe) were recorded at 150 kg Nlha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1096 · show in text ↑
e1

“performance of fodder oats (Avena sativa L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–303 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual soil organic carbon and available N contents were significantly influenced by nitrogen and sheep manure application.

Taxon
Avena sativa LAvena sativae1
Treatment
application of nitrogen and sheep manuree2
Outcome
residual soil organic carbon and available N contentse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“The residual soil organic carbon and available N contents were significantly influenced with application of nitrogen and sheep manure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1623–1756 · show in text ↑
e1

“performance of fodder oats (Avena sativa L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–303 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen at 100 kg/ha with Azotobacter inoculation and sheep manure at 10 t/ha is recommended for higher and quality fodder of oats.

Outcome
higher and quality foddere2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“may be applied for higher and quality fodder of oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1863–1915 · show in text ↑
e1

“performance of fodder oats (Avena sativa L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–303 · show in text ↑

Azotobacter · quality: protein · Avena sativa (oats)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Azotobacter · growth · Avena sativa (oats)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

fertilization · quality: protein · Avena sativa (oats)Results differ

28 papers: 25 positive, 3 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

inoculation · growth · Avena sativa (oats)Results differ

33 papers: 30 positive, 3 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

inoculation · quality: protein · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.