Abstract
A field experiment was conducted during rabi of 2006-07 and 2007-08 at Bikaner to find out the effect of dif- ferent levels of nitrogen (0, 50, 100 and 150 kglha), biofertilizer (uninoculated and inoculated with Azotobacter) and sheep manure (0 and 10 Vha) on performance of fodder oats (Avena sativa L). Results revealed that 150 kg Nlha significantly increased the growth attributes leading to higher dry matter (11 .I3 Vha) and crude protein yields (988.7 kglha). Seed inoculation with Azotobacter increased the dry matter and crude protein yields by 5.93 and 7.00% over uninoculated control. Sheep manure @ 10 Vha significantly increased the green fodder, dry mat- ter, and crude protein yields to the extent of 21, 22.1 and 26.0% respectively over no sheep manure. Interaction effect of nitrogen and sheep manure was significant and dry matter yields recorded at 100 kg Nlha alongwith 10 t sheep manurelha and 150 kg Nlha alone were at par. Highest values of net returns (Rs 23,285/ha), net B:C ratio (1.00), N, P and K uptake, energy responsiveness (8.32 MJIRe) were recorded at 150 kg Nlha. .However, maxi- mum values of energy ratio (8.26) and energy productivity (458.9 g1MJ) were obtained with 100 kg Nlha, whereas, highest values of agronomic N-use efficiency (43.9 kg dmlkg-N applied) and physiological N-use effi- ciency (68.7 kg dmlkg N uptake) were recorded with 50 kg Nlha. Application of Azotobacter inoculation and sheep manure registered higher values of above traits than their respective control except agronomic and physi- ological N-use efficiencies, where control treatment recorded greater values. The residual soil organic carbon and available N contents were significantly influenced with application of nitrogen and sheep manure. The re- sults show that nitrogen @ 100 kglha alongwith Azotobacter inoculation and sheep manure @ 10 Vha may be applied for higher and quality fodder of oats.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 15
Claim · model-written summary
150 kg N per ha significantly increased oat growth attributes.
- Taxon
- Avena sativa L
Avena sativae1 - Treatment
- 150 kg Nlhae0
- Outcome
- growth attributese0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Results revealed that 150 kg Nlha significantly increased the growth attributes leading to higher dry matter (11 .I3 Vha) and crude protein yields (988.7 kglha)”
e1“performance of fodder oats (Avena sativa L)”
Claim · model-written summary
150 kg N per ha gave higher dry matter yield (11 .I3 Vha).
- Taxon
- Avena sativa L
Avena sativae1 - Treatment
- 150 kg Nlhae0
- Outcome
- dry mattere0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 11 .I3 Vhae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Results revealed that 150 kg Nlha significantly increased the growth attributes leading to higher dry matter (11 .I3 Vha) and crude protein yields (988.7 kglha)”
e1“performance of fodder oats (Avena sativa L)”
Claim · model-written summary
150 kg N per ha gave higher crude protein yield (988.7 kg/ha).
- Taxon
- Avena sativa L
Avena sativae1 - Treatment
- 150 kg Nlhae0
- Outcome
- crude protein yieldse0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 988.7 kglhae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Results revealed that 150 kg Nlha significantly increased the growth attributes leading to higher dry matter (11 .I3 Vha) and crude protein yields (988.7 kglha)”
e1“performance of fodder oats (Avena sativa L)”
Claim · model-written summary
Seed inoculation with Azotobacter increased dry matter yield by 5.93% over uninoculated control.
- Taxon
- Avena sativa L
Avena sativae1 - Treatment
- Seed inoculation with Azotobactere3
- Interactor
- Azotobacter
Azotobactere3symbiont - Outcome
- dry mattere3
- Direction
- increasede3
- Value
- 5.93e3
- Comparator
- uninoculated controle3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e3“Seed inoculation with Azotobacter increased the dry matter and crude protein yields by 5.93 and 7.00% over uninoculated control”
e1“performance of fodder oats (Avena sativa L)”
Claim · model-written summary
Seed inoculation with Azotobacter increased crude protein yield by 7.00% over uninoculated control.
- Taxon
- Avena sativa L
Avena sativae1 - Treatment
- Seed inoculation with Azotobactere3
- Interactor
- Azotobacter
Azotobactere3symbiont - Outcome
- crude protein yieldse3
- Direction
- increasede3
- Value
- 7.00%e3
- Comparator
- uninoculated controle3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e3“Seed inoculation with Azotobacter increased the dry matter and crude protein yields by 5.93 and 7.00% over uninoculated control”
e1“performance of fodder oats (Avena sativa L)”
Claim · model-written summary
Sheep manure at 10 t/ha significantly increased green fodder yield by 21% over no sheep manure.
- Taxon
- Avena sativa L
Avena sativae1 - Treatment
- Sheep manure @ 10 Vhae4
- Outcome
- green foddere4
- Direction
- increasede4
- Value
- 21e4
- Comparator
- no sheep manuree4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e4“Sheep manure @ 10 Vha significantly increased the green fodder, dry mat- ter, and crude protein yields to the extent of 21, 22.1 and 26.0% respectively over no sheep manure”
e1“performance of fodder oats (Avena sativa L)”
Claim · model-written summary
Sheep manure at 10 t/ha significantly increased dry matter yield by 22.1% over no sheep manure.
- Taxon
- Avena sativa L
Avena sativae1 - Treatment
- Sheep manure @ 10 Vhae4
- Outcome
- dry mat- tere4
- Direction
- increasede4
- Value
- 22.1e4
- Comparator
- no sheep manuree4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e4“Sheep manure @ 10 Vha significantly increased the green fodder, dry mat- ter, and crude protein yields to the extent of 21, 22.1 and 26.0% respectively over no sheep manure”
e1“performance of fodder oats (Avena sativa L)”
Claim · model-written summary
Sheep manure at 10 t/ha significantly increased crude protein yield by 26.0% over no sheep manure.
- Taxon
- Avena sativa L
Avena sativae1 - Treatment
- Sheep manure @ 10 Vhae4
- Outcome
- crude protein yieldse4
- Direction
- increasede4
- Value
- 26.0%e4
- Comparator
- no sheep manuree4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e4“Sheep manure @ 10 Vha significantly increased the green fodder, dry mat- ter, and crude protein yields to the extent of 21, 22.1 and 26.0% respectively over no sheep manure”
e1“performance of fodder oats (Avena sativa L)”
Claim · model-written summary
Dry matter yields at 100 kg N with 10 t sheep manure per ha and at 150 kg N alone were at par.
- Taxon
- Avena sativa L
Avena sativae1 - Treatment
- 100 kg Nlha alongwith 10 t sheep manurelhae5
- Outcome
- dry matter yieldse5
- Qualifier
- Interaction effect of nitrogen and sheep manure was significante5
- Comparator
- 150 kg Nlha alonee5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e5“Interaction effect of nitrogen and sheep manure was significant and dry matter yields recorded at 100 kg Nlha alongwith 10 t sheep manurelha and 150 kg Nlha alone were at par”
e1“performance of fodder oats (Avena sativa L)”
Claim · model-written summary
Net returns were highest at 150 kg N per ha.
- Taxon
- Avena sativa L
Avena sativae1 - Treatment
- 150 kg Nlhae6
- Outcome
- net returnse6
- Direction
- Higheste6
- Value
- Rs 23,285/hae6
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e6“Highest values of net returns (Rs 23,285/ha), net B:C ratio (1.00), N, P and K uptake, energy responsiveness (8.32 MJIRe) were recorded at 150 kg Nlha”
e1“performance of fodder oats (Avena sativa L)”
Claim · model-written summary
Net B:C ratio was highest at 150 kg N per ha.
- Taxon
- Avena sativa L
Avena sativae1 - Treatment
- 150 kg Nlhae6
- Outcome
- net B:C ratioe6
- Direction
- Higheste6
- Value
- 1.00e6
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e6“Highest values of net returns (Rs 23,285/ha), net B:C ratio (1.00), N, P and K uptake, energy responsiveness (8.32 MJIRe) were recorded at 150 kg Nlha”
e1“performance of fodder oats (Avena sativa L)”
Claim · model-written summary
Energy responsiveness was highest at 150 kg N per ha.
- Taxon
- Avena sativa L
Avena sativae1 - Treatment
- 150 kg Nlhae6
- Outcome
- energy responsivenesse6
- Direction
- Higheste6
- Value
- 8.32 MJIRee6
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e6“Highest values of net returns (Rs 23,285/ha), net B:C ratio (1.00), N, P and K uptake, energy responsiveness (8.32 MJIRe) were recorded at 150 kg Nlha”
e1“performance of fodder oats (Avena sativa L)”
Claim · model-written summary
N, P and K uptake were highest at 150 kg N per ha.
- Taxon
- Avena sativa L
Avena sativae1 - Treatment
- 150 kg Nlhae6
- Outcome
- N, P and K uptakee6
- Direction
- Higheste6
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e6“Highest values of net returns (Rs 23,285/ha), net B:C ratio (1.00), N, P and K uptake, energy responsiveness (8.32 MJIRe) were recorded at 150 kg Nlha”
e1“performance of fodder oats (Avena sativa L)”
Claim · model-written summary
Residual soil organic carbon and available N contents were significantly influenced by nitrogen and sheep manure application.
- Taxon
- Avena sativa L
Avena sativae1 - Treatment
- application of nitrogen and sheep manuree2
- Outcome
- residual soil organic carbon and available N contentse2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e2“The residual soil organic carbon and available N contents were significantly influenced with application of nitrogen and sheep manure”
e1“performance of fodder oats (Avena sativa L)”
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen at 100 kg/ha with Azotobacter inoculation and sheep manure at 10 t/ha is recommended for higher and quality fodder of oats.
- Taxon
- oats
Avena sativae2 - Outcome
- higher and quality foddere2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e2“may be applied for higher and quality fodder of oats”
e1“performance of fodder oats (Avena sativa L)”
The same questions in other papers
Azotobacter · quality: protein · Avena sativa (oats)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
Azotobacter · growth · Avena sativa (oats)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
fertilization · quality: protein · Avena sativa (oats)Results differ
24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
24 papers more in this group
See all 28 papers →inoculation · growth · Avena sativa (oats)Results differ
29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
29 papers more in this group
See all 33 papers →inoculation · quality: protein · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.