Abstract
Based on different substrates(charcoal,peat,cultivate soil,organic compost,mushroom residue)as carrier material,three phosphate solubilizing bacteria(Bacillus sp.,Pseudomonas sp.and Azotobacter sp.)strains and one associate fixation bacteria isolated from rhizosphere of alfalfa and wheat were used to produce PGPR inoculants.A randomized block experiments was carried out to determine the effect of different inoculants on hay yield and grain yield of oat.The results showed that except No.4 inoculants,the viable bacteria of other treatments accorded with the quality criterion of agricultural microbial fertilizer of China(NY227-94),and No.1 inoculants and No.2 inoculants had higher viable bacteria.The field experiments indicated that PGPR inoculants had obvious promotion on height,hay yield and grain yield of oat while no significant difference on height.Meanwhile,the effect of PGPR inoculants on hay yeild has a significant relation with phenological period of the oats.No.1inoculants was the best for filling stage while No.5 inoculants was better for mature period.Compares to control,the hay yield and grain yield of No.1 inoculant increased by 20.4%and 10.8%,respectively.In conclusion,No.1 inoculant was the best compound carrier formulation to produce PGPR inoculants.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
PGPR inoculants promoted hay yield and grain yield of oat.
- Taxon
- oat
Avena sativae1 - Treatment
- PGPR inoculantse1
- Interactor
- PGPRe1symbiont
- Outcome
- hay yield and grain yielde1
- Direction
- promotione1
- Comparator
- controle2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“PGPR inoculants had obvious promotion on height,hay yield and grain yield of oat while no significant difference on height”
e2“Compares to control,the hay yield and grain yield of No.1 inoculant increased by 20.4%and 10.8%,respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
PGPR inoculants had no significant difference on the height of oat.
- Taxon
- oatAvena sativae1
- Treatment
- PGPR inoculantse1
- Interactor
- PGPRe1symbiont
- Outcome
- heighte1
- Direction
- no significant differencee1
- Comparator
- controle2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“PGPR inoculants had obvious promotion on height,hay yield and grain yield of oat while no significant difference on height”
e2“Compares to control,the hay yield and grain yield of No.1 inoculant increased by 20.4%and 10.8%,respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
The effect of PGPR inoculants on oat hay yield has a significant relation with the phenological period of the oats.
- Taxon
- oatsAvena sativae3
- Organ / stage
- phenological periode3
- Treatment
- PGPR inoculantse3
- Interactor
- PGPRe3symbiont
- Outcome
- effect of PGPR inoculants on hay yeilde3
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e3“the effect of PGPR inoculants on hay yeild has a significant relation with phenological period of the oats”
Claim · model-written summary
No.1 inoculant was the best for the filling stage of oat.
- Taxon
- oatAvena sativae1
- Organ / stage
- filling stagee4
- Treatment
- No.1inoculantse4
- Outcome
- best for filling stagee4
- Direction
- beste4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“PGPR inoculants had obvious promotion on height,hay yield and grain yield of oat while no significant difference on height”
e4“No.1inoculants was the best for filling stage while No.5 inoculants was better for mature period”
Claim · model-written summary
No.5 inoculant was better for the mature period of oat.
- Taxon
- oatAvena sativae1
- Organ / stage
- mature periode4
- Treatment
- No.5 inoculantse4
- Outcome
- better for mature periode4
- Direction
- bettere4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“PGPR inoculants had obvious promotion on height,hay yield and grain yield of oat while no significant difference on height”
e4“No.1inoculants was the best for filling stage while No.5 inoculants was better for mature period”
Claim · model-written summary
No.1 inoculant increased oat hay yield by 20.4% compared with control.
- Taxon
- oatAvena sativae1
- Treatment
- No.1 inoculante2
- Outcome
- hay yielde2
- Direction
- increasede2
- Value
- 20.4%e2
- Comparator
- controle2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“PGPR inoculants had obvious promotion on height,hay yield and grain yield of oat while no significant difference on height”
e2“Compares to control,the hay yield and grain yield of No.1 inoculant increased by 20.4%and 10.8%,respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
No.1 inoculant increased oat grain yield by 10.8% compared with control.
- Taxon
- oatAvena sativae1
- Treatment
- No.1 inoculante2
- Outcome
- grain yielde2
- Direction
- increasede2
- Value
- 10.8%e2
- Comparator
- controle2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“PGPR inoculants had obvious promotion on height,hay yield and grain yield of oat while no significant difference on height”
e2“Compares to control,the hay yield and grain yield of No.1 inoculant increased by 20.4%and 10.8%,respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
No.1 and No.2 inoculants had higher viable bacteria than the other inoculants.
- Taxon
- oatAvena sativae1
- Treatment
- No.1inoculantse5
- Outcome
- viable bacteriae5
- Direction
- highere5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“PGPR inoculants had obvious promotion on height,hay yield and grain yield of oat while no significant difference on height”
e5“The results showed that except No.4 inoculants,the viable bacteria of other treatments accorded with the quality criterion of agricultural microbial fertilizer of China(NY227-94),and No.1 inoculants and No.2 inoculants had higher viable bacteria”
Claim · model-written summary
Viable bacteria of the inoculants other than No.4 accorded with the national quality criterion for agricultural microbial fertilizer.
- Taxon
- oatAvena sativae1
- Treatment
- other treatmentse5
- Outcome
- viable bacteriae5
- Qualifier
- accorded with the quality criterion of agricultural microbial fertilizer of China(NY227-94)e5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“PGPR inoculants had obvious promotion on height,hay yield and grain yield of oat while no significant difference on height”
e5“The results showed that except No.4 inoculants,the viable bacteria of other treatments accorded with the quality criterion of agricultural microbial fertilizer of China(NY227-94),and No.1 inoculants and No.2 inoculants had higher viable bacteria”
Claim · model-written summary
No.1 inoculant is recommended as the best compound carrier formulation for producing PGPR inoculants.
- Taxon
- oatAvena sativae1
- Treatment
- No.1 inoculante6
- Outcome
- compound carrier formulatione6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“PGPR inoculants had obvious promotion on height,hay yield and grain yield of oat while no significant difference on height”
e6“In conclusion,No.1 inoculant was the best compound carrier formulation to produce PGPR inoculants”
The same questions in other papers
inoculation · growth · Avena sativa (oats)Results differ
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
29 papers more in this group
See all 33 papers →inoculation · yield · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results
25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
31 papers more in this group
See all 35 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.