Azotobacter 3,977 claims

genus · family Pseudomonadaceae · bacterium · NCBI Taxonomy ↗

Also written in claims: 溶磷菌 DHS5 — NCBI synonyms: Azotomonas · Parachromatium

22 spellings

Azotobacter · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

3,977 claims

Open in search (filters, sorting) →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RDN through FYM or vermicompost with Azotobacter and Pseudomonas were the best treatments in increasing plant height, plant spread and stem girth.

Taxon: sweet orangeCitrus sinensise1
Treatment: application of RDN through FYM + Azotobacter sp. + Pseudomonas sp. and application of RDN through Vermicompost + Azotobacter sp. + Pseudomonas sp.e3
Interactor: Azotobacter sp.Azotobactere3symbiont
Second interactor: Pseudomonas sp.Pseudomonase3symbiont
Outcome: plant height (cm), plant spread (cm), stem girth (cm)e4
Direction: increasinge4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1
“the effect of manures and bio fertilizers on growth, yield and quality of three years old sweet orange cv. Hamlin”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 43–156

e3
“application of RDN through FYM + Azotobacter sp. + Pseudomonas sp. and application of RDN through Vermicompost + Azotobacter sp. + Pseudomonas sp.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 729–875

e4
“increasing the plant height (cm), plant spread (cm), stem girth (cm)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 912–980

Title

Effect of Manures and Bio Fertilizers on Growth, Yield and Quality of Sweet Orange cv. Hamlin

Suresh Kumar; Rajesh Lathar; Narender Yadav; et al. International Journal of Plant & Soil Science 2026. doi:10.9734/ijpss/2026/v38i25989

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect Manures and bio fertilizers significantly increased growth, yield and quality of sweet orange fruit crop.
Intervention effect The same best treatments increased fruit length, fruit breadth and average fruit weight.
Intervention effect The same best treatments increased number of fruits per plant and yield per plant.
Intervention effect The same best treatments increased TSS.
Intervention effect The same best treatments decreased acidity.
Intervention effect The same best treatments were best for TSS:Acid ratio.
Intervention effect The same best treatments were best for soil pH, EC and SOC.
Intervention effect The same best treatments were best for available N, P and K.
Intervention effect The same best treatments were best for bacterial count and fungal count.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same best treatments increased fruit length, fruit breadth and average fruit weight.

Taxon: sweet orangeCitrus sinensise1
Treatment: application of RDN through FYM + Azotobacter sp. + Pseudomonas sp. and application of RDN through Vermicompost + Azotobacter sp. + Pseudomonas sp.e3
Interactor: Azotobacter sp.Azotobactere3symbiont
Second interactor: Pseudomonas sp.Pseudomonase3symbiont
Outcome: fruit length (mm), fruit breadth (mm), average fruit weight (g)e4
Direction: increaseinferrede4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1
“the effect of manures and bio fertilizers on growth, yield and quality of three years old sweet orange cv. Hamlin”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 43–156

e3
“application of RDN through FYM + Azotobacter sp. + Pseudomonas sp. and application of RDN through Vermicompost + Azotobacter sp. + Pseudomonas sp.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 729–875

e4
“fruit length (mm), fruit breadth (mm), average fruit weight (g)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1045

Title

Effect of Manures and Bio Fertilizers on Growth, Yield and Quality of Sweet Orange cv. Hamlin

Suresh Kumar; Rajesh Lathar; Narender Yadav; et al. International Journal of Plant & Soil Science 2026. doi:10.9734/ijpss/2026/v38i25989

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect Manures and bio fertilizers significantly increased growth, yield and quality of sweet orange fruit crop.
Intervention effect RDN through FYM or vermicompost with Azotobacter and Pseudomonas were the best treatments in increasing plant height, plant spread and stem girth.
Intervention effect The same best treatments increased number of fruits per plant and yield per plant.
Intervention effect The same best treatments increased TSS.
Intervention effect The same best treatments decreased acidity.
Intervention effect The same best treatments were best for TSS:Acid ratio.
Intervention effect The same best treatments were best for soil pH, EC and SOC.
Intervention effect The same best treatments were best for available N, P and K.
Intervention effect The same best treatments were best for bacterial count and fungal count.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same best treatments increased number of fruits per plant and yield per plant.

Taxon: sweet orangeCitrus sinensise1
Treatment: application of RDN through FYM + Azotobacter sp. + Pseudomonas sp. and application of RDN through Vermicompost + Azotobacter sp. + Pseudomonas sp.e3
Interactor: Azotobacter sp.Azotobactere3symbiont
Second interactor: Pseudomonas sp.Pseudomonase3symbiont
Outcome: number of fruits per plant, yield (kg/plant)e4
Direction: increaseinferrede4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1
“the effect of manures and bio fertilizers on growth, yield and quality of three years old sweet orange cv. Hamlin”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 43–156

e3
“application of RDN through FYM + Azotobacter sp. + Pseudomonas sp. and application of RDN through Vermicompost + Azotobacter sp. + Pseudomonas sp.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 729–875

e4
“number of fruits per plant, yield (kg/plant)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1091

Title

Effect of Manures and Bio Fertilizers on Growth, Yield and Quality of Sweet Orange cv. Hamlin

Suresh Kumar; Rajesh Lathar; Narender Yadav; et al. International Journal of Plant & Soil Science 2026. doi:10.9734/ijpss/2026/v38i25989

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect Manures and bio fertilizers significantly increased growth, yield and quality of sweet orange fruit crop.
Intervention effect RDN through FYM or vermicompost with Azotobacter and Pseudomonas were the best treatments in increasing plant height, plant spread and stem girth.
Intervention effect The same best treatments increased fruit length, fruit breadth and average fruit weight.
Intervention effect The same best treatments increased TSS.
Intervention effect The same best treatments decreased acidity.
Intervention effect The same best treatments were best for TSS:Acid ratio.
Intervention effect The same best treatments were best for soil pH, EC and SOC.
Intervention effect The same best treatments were best for available N, P and K.
Intervention effect The same best treatments were best for bacterial count and fungal count.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same best treatments increased TSS.

Taxon: sweet orangeCitrus sinensise1
Treatment: application of RDN through FYM + Azotobacter sp. + Pseudomonas sp. and application of RDN through Vermicompost + Azotobacter sp. + Pseudomonas sp.e3
Interactor: Azotobacter sp.Azotobactere3symbiont
Second interactor: Pseudomonas sp.Pseudomonase3symbiont
Outcome: TSS (°Brix)e4
Direction: increaseinferrede4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1
“the effect of manures and bio fertilizers on growth, yield and quality of three years old sweet orange cv. Hamlin”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 43–156

e3
“application of RDN through FYM + Azotobacter sp. + Pseudomonas sp. and application of RDN through Vermicompost + Azotobacter sp. + Pseudomonas sp.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 729–875

e4
“TSS (°Brix)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1093–1104

Title

Effect of Manures and Bio Fertilizers on Growth, Yield and Quality of Sweet Orange cv. Hamlin

Suresh Kumar; Rajesh Lathar; Narender Yadav; et al. International Journal of Plant & Soil Science 2026. doi:10.9734/ijpss/2026/v38i25989

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect Manures and bio fertilizers significantly increased growth, yield and quality of sweet orange fruit crop.
Intervention effect RDN through FYM or vermicompost with Azotobacter and Pseudomonas were the best treatments in increasing plant height, plant spread and stem girth.
Intervention effect The same best treatments increased fruit length, fruit breadth and average fruit weight.
Intervention effect The same best treatments increased number of fruits per plant and yield per plant.
Intervention effect The same best treatments decreased acidity.
Intervention effect The same best treatments were best for TSS:Acid ratio.
Intervention effect The same best treatments were best for soil pH, EC and SOC.
Intervention effect The same best treatments were best for available N, P and K.
Intervention effect The same best treatments were best for bacterial count and fungal count.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same best treatments decreased acidity.

Taxon: sweet orangeCitrus sinensise1
Treatment: application of RDN through FYM + Azotobacter sp. + Pseudomonas sp. and application of RDN through Vermicompost + Azotobacter sp. + Pseudomonas sp.e3
Interactor: Azotobacter sp.Azotobactere3symbiont
Second interactor: Pseudomonas sp.Pseudomonase3symbiont
Outcome: acidity (%)e4
Direction: decreasinge4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1
“the effect of manures and bio fertilizers on growth, yield and quality of three years old sweet orange cv. Hamlin”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 43–156

e3
“application of RDN through FYM + Azotobacter sp. + Pseudomonas sp. and application of RDN through Vermicompost + Azotobacter sp. + Pseudomonas sp.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 729–875

e4
“decreasing acidity (%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1128

Title

Effect of Manures and Bio Fertilizers on Growth, Yield and Quality of Sweet Orange cv. Hamlin

Suresh Kumar; Rajesh Lathar; Narender Yadav; et al. International Journal of Plant & Soil Science 2026. doi:10.9734/ijpss/2026/v38i25989

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect Manures and bio fertilizers significantly increased growth, yield and quality of sweet orange fruit crop.
Intervention effect RDN through FYM or vermicompost with Azotobacter and Pseudomonas were the best treatments in increasing plant height, plant spread and stem girth.
Intervention effect The same best treatments increased fruit length, fruit breadth and average fruit weight.
Intervention effect The same best treatments increased number of fruits per plant and yield per plant.
Intervention effect The same best treatments increased TSS.
Intervention effect The same best treatments were best for TSS:Acid ratio.
Intervention effect The same best treatments were best for soil pH, EC and SOC.
Intervention effect The same best treatments were best for available N, P and K.
Intervention effect The same best treatments were best for bacterial count and fungal count.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same best treatments were best for TSS:Acid ratio.

Taxon: sweet orangeCitrus sinensise1
Treatment: application of RDN through FYM + Azotobacter sp. + Pseudomonas sp. and application of RDN through Vermicompost + Azotobacter sp. + Pseudomonas sp.e3
Interactor: Azotobacter sp.Azotobactere3symbiont
Second interactor: Pseudomonas sp.Pseudomonase3symbiont
Outcome: TSS:Acide4

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e1
“the effect of manures and bio fertilizers on growth, yield and quality of three years old sweet orange cv. Hamlin”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 43–156

e3
“application of RDN through FYM + Azotobacter sp. + Pseudomonas sp. and application of RDN through Vermicompost + Azotobacter sp. + Pseudomonas sp.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 729–875

e4
“TSS:Acid”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1130–1138

Title

Effect of Manures and Bio Fertilizers on Growth, Yield and Quality of Sweet Orange cv. Hamlin

Suresh Kumar; Rajesh Lathar; Narender Yadav; et al. International Journal of Plant & Soil Science 2026. doi:10.9734/ijpss/2026/v38i25989

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect Manures and bio fertilizers significantly increased growth, yield and quality of sweet orange fruit crop.
Intervention effect RDN through FYM or vermicompost with Azotobacter and Pseudomonas were the best treatments in increasing plant height, plant spread and stem girth.
Intervention effect The same best treatments increased fruit length, fruit breadth and average fruit weight.
Intervention effect The same best treatments increased number of fruits per plant and yield per plant.
Intervention effect The same best treatments increased TSS.
Intervention effect The same best treatments decreased acidity.
Intervention effect The same best treatments were best for soil pH, EC and SOC.
Intervention effect The same best treatments were best for available N, P and K.
Intervention effect The same best treatments were best for bacterial count and fungal count.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same best treatments were best for soil pH, EC and SOC.

Taxon: sweet orangeCitrus sinensise1
Treatment: application of RDN through FYM + Azotobacter sp. + Pseudomonas sp. and application of RDN through Vermicompost + Azotobacter sp. + Pseudomonas sp.e3
Interactor: Azotobacter sp.Azotobactere3symbiont
Second interactor: Pseudomonas sp.Pseudomonase3symbiont
Outcome: Initial soil pH, EC (dS/m), SOC (%)e4

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e1
“the effect of manures and bio fertilizers on growth, yield and quality of three years old sweet orange cv. Hamlin”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 43–156

e3
“application of RDN through FYM + Azotobacter sp. + Pseudomonas sp. and application of RDN through Vermicompost + Azotobacter sp. + Pseudomonas sp.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 729–875

e4
“Initial soil pH, EC (dS/m), SOC (%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1140–1175

Title

Effect of Manures and Bio Fertilizers on Growth, Yield and Quality of Sweet Orange cv. Hamlin

Suresh Kumar; Rajesh Lathar; Narender Yadav; et al. International Journal of Plant & Soil Science 2026. doi:10.9734/ijpss/2026/v38i25989

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect Manures and bio fertilizers significantly increased growth, yield and quality of sweet orange fruit crop.
Intervention effect RDN through FYM or vermicompost with Azotobacter and Pseudomonas were the best treatments in increasing plant height, plant spread and stem girth.
Intervention effect The same best treatments increased fruit length, fruit breadth and average fruit weight.
Intervention effect The same best treatments increased number of fruits per plant and yield per plant.
Intervention effect The same best treatments increased TSS.
Intervention effect The same best treatments decreased acidity.
Intervention effect The same best treatments were best for TSS:Acid ratio.
Intervention effect The same best treatments were best for available N, P and K.
Intervention effect The same best treatments were best for bacterial count and fungal count.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same best treatments were best for available N, P and K.

Taxon: sweet orangeCitrus sinensise1
Treatment: application of RDN through FYM + Azotobacter sp. + Pseudomonas sp. and application of RDN through Vermicompost + Azotobacter sp. + Pseudomonas sp.e3
Interactor: Azotobacter sp.Azotobactere3symbiont
Second interactor: Pseudomonas sp.Pseudomonase3symbiont
Outcome: Available N (kg/ha), P (kg/ha), K (kg/ha)e4

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e1
“the effect of manures and bio fertilizers on growth, yield and quality of three years old sweet orange cv. Hamlin”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 43–156

e3
“application of RDN through FYM + Azotobacter sp. + Pseudomonas sp. and application of RDN through Vermicompost + Azotobacter sp. + Pseudomonas sp.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 729–875

e4
“Available N (kg/ha), P (kg/ha), K (kg/ha)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1177–1218

Title

Effect of Manures and Bio Fertilizers on Growth, Yield and Quality of Sweet Orange cv. Hamlin

Suresh Kumar; Rajesh Lathar; Narender Yadav; et al. International Journal of Plant & Soil Science 2026. doi:10.9734/ijpss/2026/v38i25989

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect Manures and bio fertilizers significantly increased growth, yield and quality of sweet orange fruit crop.
Intervention effect RDN through FYM or vermicompost with Azotobacter and Pseudomonas were the best treatments in increasing plant height, plant spread and stem girth.
Intervention effect The same best treatments increased fruit length, fruit breadth and average fruit weight.
Intervention effect The same best treatments increased number of fruits per plant and yield per plant.
Intervention effect The same best treatments increased TSS.
Intervention effect The same best treatments decreased acidity.
Intervention effect The same best treatments were best for TSS:Acid ratio.
Intervention effect The same best treatments were best for soil pH, EC and SOC.
Intervention effect The same best treatments were best for bacterial count and fungal count.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same best treatments were best for bacterial count and fungal count.

Taxon: sweet orangeCitrus sinensise1
Treatment: application of RDN through FYM + Azotobacter sp. + Pseudomonas sp. and application of RDN through Vermicompost + Azotobacter sp. + Pseudomonas sp.e3
Interactor: Azotobacter sp.Azotobactere3symbiont
Second interactor: Pseudomonas sp.Pseudomonase3symbiont
Outcome: bacterial count and fungal counte4

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e1
“the effect of manures and bio fertilizers on growth, yield and quality of three years old sweet orange cv. Hamlin”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 43–156

e3
“application of RDN through FYM + Azotobacter sp. + Pseudomonas sp. and application of RDN through Vermicompost + Azotobacter sp. + Pseudomonas sp.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 729–875

e4
“bacterial count and fungal count”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1220–1252

Title

Effect of Manures and Bio Fertilizers on Growth, Yield and Quality of Sweet Orange cv. Hamlin

Suresh Kumar; Rajesh Lathar; Narender Yadav; et al. International Journal of Plant & Soil Science 2026. doi:10.9734/ijpss/2026/v38i25989

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect Manures and bio fertilizers significantly increased growth, yield and quality of sweet orange fruit crop.
Intervention effect RDN through FYM or vermicompost with Azotobacter and Pseudomonas were the best treatments in increasing plant height, plant spread and stem girth.
Intervention effect The same best treatments increased fruit length, fruit breadth and average fruit weight.
Intervention effect The same best treatments increased number of fruits per plant and yield per plant.
Intervention effect The same best treatments increased TSS.
Intervention effect The same best treatments decreased acidity.
Intervention effect The same best treatments were best for TSS:Acid ratio.
Intervention effect The same best treatments were best for soil pH, EC and SOC.
Intervention effect The same best treatments were best for available N, P and K.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment T9 (FYM, VC, Azotobacter and PSB) recorded 5.41 and 5.68 days taken to bulb sprouting in Lilium.

Taxon: LiliumLiliume1
Treatment: FYM @ 5.0 t/ha + VC @ 2.5 t/ha + Azotobacter + PSB (T9)e2
Interactor: AzotobacterAzotobactere2symbiont
Second interactor: PSBe2symbiont
Outcome: days taken to bulb sproutinge2
Value: 5.41 & 5.68 dayse2
Setting: Agri-tourism Centre, CCS HAU, Hisar (Haryana)e1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e1
“The present experiment on the effect of organic manures and biofertilizers on growth characters of Lilium growing under different cultivation practices was carried out during 2021-22 and 2022-23 at Agri-tourism Centre, CCS HAU, Hisar (Haryana)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–243

e2
“the treatment applied with FYM @ 5.0 t/ha + VC @ 2.5 t/ha + Azotobacter + PSB (T9) recorded days taken to bulb sprouting (5.41 & 5.68 days), plant height (102.54 & 105.31 cm), number of leaves per plant (70.86 & 72.91), leaf length (9.25 & 9.70 cm), leaf width (2.59 & 2.75 cm)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 403–680

Title

Effect of Organic Manures and Biofertilizers on Growth Characters of Lilium Growing Under Different Cultivation Practices

Man Mohan; Rohan Tomar; Swati Rawat Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) 2026. doi:10.5281/zenodo.20846371

Other claims from this paper (5)

Intervention effect Treatment T9 recorded plant height of 102.54 and 105.31 cm in Lilium.
Intervention effect Treatment T9 recorded 70.86 and 72.91 leaves per Lilium plant.
Intervention effect Treatment T9 recorded leaf length of 9.25 and 9.70 cm in Lilium.
Intervention effect Treatment T9 recorded leaf width of 2.59 and 2.75 cm in Lilium.
Intervention effect Organic manure could increase vegetative growth of Lilium in combination with biofertilizers.