Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The same best treatments increased fruit length, fruit breadth and average fruit weight.

A claim from Effect of Manures and Bio Fertilizers on Growth, Yield and Quality of Sweet Orange cv. Hamlin · 2026

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same best treatments increased fruit length, fruit breadth and average fruit weight.

Taxon
sweet orangeCitrus sinensise1
Treatment
application of RDN through FYM + Azotobacter sp. + Pseudomonas sp. and application of RDN through Vermicompost + Azotobacter sp. + Pseudomonas sp.e3
Interactor
Azotobacter sp.Azotobactere3symbiont
Second interactor
Pseudomonas sp.Pseudomonase3symbiont
Outcome
fruit length (mm), fruit breadth (mm), average fruit weight (g)e4
Direction
increaseinferrede4

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas
Pseudomonas · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)CDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the effect of manures and bio fertilizers on growth, yield and quality of three years old sweet orange cv. Hamlin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 43–156
e3

“application of RDN through FYM + Azotobacter sp. + Pseudomonas sp. and application of RDN through Vermicompost + Azotobacter sp. + Pseudomonas sp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 729–875
e4

“fruit length (mm), fruit breadth (mm), average fruit weight (g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1045

Title

Effect of Manures and Bio Fertilizers on Growth, Yield and Quality of Sweet Orange cv. Hamlin

Suresh Kumar; Rajesh Lathar; Narender Yadav; et al. International Journal of Plant & Soil Science 2026. doi:10.9734/ijpss/2026/v38i25989

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-3049fb243df2db503318814ffabb4f7015db9b39c903d2a5d95f93c2d8bffdab · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

Pseudomonas · yield · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Azotobacter · yield · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

fertilization · yield · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Positive and negative results

56 papers: 54 positive, 2 negative or no effect

53 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

47 papers more in this group

See all 56 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.