Azotobacter 16 claims

genus · family Pseudomonadaceae · bacterium · NCBI Taxonomy ↗

NCBI synonyms: Azotomonas · Parachromatium

4 spellings

Azotobacter · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

16 claims

Open in search (filters, sorting) →

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 produced the peak Azotobacter count of 30.38 × 104 cfu/g.

Taxon: AzotobacterAzotobactere0
Treatment: Azotobacter with 50% N through FYM and 50% through vermicomposte1
Outcome: Azotobacter countse0
Direction: peake0
Value: 30.38 × 104 cfu/ge0

Verbatim

e0
“Microbial assessments revealed peak Azotobacter counts in T4 (30.38 × 104 cfu/g)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1538–1618

e1
“The treatment combining Azotobacter with 50% N through FYM and 50% through vermicompost (T4)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 931–1023

Title

Integrated application of organic manures and azotobacter enhances growth, yield, soil fertility, and microbial activity in red dragon fruit ( Hylocereus costaricensis )

Sumit Bura; Amit Jasrotia; Arti Sharma; et al. Journal of Plant Nutrition 2026. doi:10.1080/01904167.2026.2635405

Other claims from this paper (13)

Intervention effect T4 enhanced stem diameter to 0.59 cm.
Intervention effect T4 enhanced plant height to 29.13 cm.
Intervention effect T4 enhanced canopy volume to 1.48 m³.
Intervention effect T4 enhanced branch number to 15.67.
Intervention effect T4 produced the highest thorn number, 59.67.
Intervention effect T4 produced the highest flower number, 18.83.
Intervention effect T4 produced the highest fruit number, 15.33 per plant.
Intervention effect T4 produced the highest yield, 4.54 kg per plant.
Observation T5 soil nitrogen was superior at 241.31 kg/ha.
Observation T5 soil phosphorus was superior at 14.37 kg/ha.
Observation T5 soil potassium was superior at 128.4 kg/ha.
Observation T7 had peak bacterial counts of 27.85 × 106 cfu/g.
Observation T8 had peak fungal counts of 27.8 × 105 cfu/g.

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strains of Terrabacter, Azotobacter, Agromyces, Prescottella and Leifsonia tolerate high concentrations of tequila vinasse.

Taxon: Terrabacter, Azotobacter, Agromyces, Prescottella, and LeifsoniaAzotobacterAgromycesTerrabacterLeifsoniaRhodococcus (subgen. Prescottella)e0
Outcome: tolerate high concentrations of tequila vinassee0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0
“strains of Terrabacter, Azotobacter, Agromyces, Prescottella, and Leifsonia tolerate high concentrations of tequila vinasse and promote maize seedling growth in the presence of tequila vinasse”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–751

Title

Plant Growth-Promoting and Tequila Vinasse-Resistant Bacterial Strains

Alberto J. Valencia-Botín; Ismael F. Chávez-Díaz; Florentina Zurita-Martínez; et al. Microbiology Research 2024. doi:10.3390/microbiolres15030077

Other claims from this paper (5)

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azotobacter populations were lower in immature than mature coffee plantings.

Taxon: AzotobacterAzotobactere0
Material: IPe0
Outcome: population of NFB Azotobactere0
Direction: lowere0
Comparator: MPe0

Verbatim

e0
“The population of NFB Azotobacter in IP was lower than in MP”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–998

Title

Abundance of Beneficial Soil Microbes in the Rhiosphere of Coffee Plants Infected by Pratylenchus coffeae

Reginawanti Hindersah; Iis Nur Asyiah Biosaintifika Journal of Biology & Biology Education 2022. doi:10.15294/biosaintifika.v15i2.43085

Other claims from this paper (8)

Observation Immature and mature arabica coffee plantations were attacked by P. coffeae.
Observation Immature and mature robusta coffee plantations were attacked by P. coffeae.
Observation NFB and PSM were isolated from coffee rhizospheres in both plantation types.
Association PSM populations did not differ between immature and mature coffee plantings.
Observation Three Azotobacter isolates were obtained.
Observation Six P solubilizing bacterial species were obtained.
Observation Six phosphate solubilizing fungal species were obtained.
Recommendation Further work was recommended to test microbes as fertilizers and bioprotectants for coffee.

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three Azotobacter isolates were obtained.

Taxon: AzotobacterAzotobactere0
Outcome: isolates of Azotobacter bacteriae0
Value: three isolatese0

Verbatim

e0
“three isolates of Azotobacter bacteria, six species of P- solubilizing bacteria (PSB) and six species of phosphate-solubilizing fungi (PSF) were obtained”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1133–1286

Title

Abundance of Beneficial Soil Microbes in the Rhiosphere of Coffee Plants Infected by Pratylenchus coffeae

Reginawanti Hindersah; Iis Nur Asyiah Biosaintifika Journal of Biology & Biology Education 2022. doi:10.15294/biosaintifika.v15i2.43085

Other claims from this paper (8)

Observation Immature and mature arabica coffee plantations were attacked by P. coffeae.
Observation Immature and mature robusta coffee plantations were attacked by P. coffeae.
Observation NFB and PSM were isolated from coffee rhizospheres in both plantation types.
Association Azotobacter populations were lower in immature than mature coffee plantings.
Association PSM populations did not differ between immature and mature coffee plantings.
Observation Six P solubilizing bacterial species were obtained.
Observation Six phosphate solubilizing fungal species were obtained.
Recommendation Further work was recommended to test microbes as fertilizers and bioprotectants for coffee.

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T12 with April planting gave an azotobacter soil count of 31.22 x 10-5 cfu/g of soil.

Taxon: azotobacterAzotobactere0
Treatment: T12 i.e. 70% NPK + Vermicompost + Biofertilizer with April plantinge0
Outcome: azotobacter counte0
Value: 31.22 x 10-5 cfu/g of soile0

Verbatim

e0
“azotobacter count (31.22 x 10-5 cfu/g of soil) and Arbuscular Mycorrhizae (AM) spore count (206.60 spore count per 50 gram) was observed with T12 i.e. 70% NPK + Vermicompost + Biofertilizer with April planting”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1942–2151

Title

Studies on Integrated Nutrient Management and Planting Dates in China Aster for Loose Flower Production

Amita Abrol; S. V. S. Chaudhary; S. R. Dhiman; et al. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 2019. doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2019.812.214

Other claims from this paper (5)

Intervention effect T12 with April planting produced maximum plant height of 72.70 cm.
Intervention effect T12 with April planting produced maximum plant spread of 29.77 cm.
Intervention effect T12 with April planting yielded early blooming at 75.97 days.
Intervention effect T12 with April planting produced 471.20 flowers per square meter.
Observation T12 with April planting gave an AM soil spore count of 206.60 per 50 gram.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All sustainable schemes appeared to favor azotobacter populations relative to control.

Taxon: azotobactersAzotobactere0
Treatment: all sustainable schemese0
Outcome: populations of azotobacterse0
Direction: favore0
Qualifier: seemede0
Comparator: controle0

Verbatim

e0
“all sustainable schemes seemed to favor the populations of azotobacters and actinomycetes, as compared to the control”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1503–1620

Title

Effect of different sustainable orchard management strategies on soil properties, nutrient uptake and soil microbiological aspects in an olive orchard

B Elias; Georgios Doupis; Adriano Sofo; et al. CINECA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Basilicata) 2017

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect ALL significantly increased soil organic matter relative to single-factor treatments.
Intervention effect Soil organic matter differentiation between single-factor treatments and control remained unclear.
Intervention effect COMP increased nitrate-N availability.
Intervention effect ALL increased nitrate-N availability.
Intervention effect PRUN alone appeared to negatively affect N availability relative to control.
Intervention effect COMP increased phosphorus availability.
Intervention effect ALL increased phosphorus availability.
Intervention effect ALL increased N and P content in olive leaves.
Intervention effect ALL positively affected mycorrhizal colonization in olive.
Intervention effect All sustainable schemes appeared to favor actinomycete populations relative to control.
Recommendation The authors conclude that adopting these sustainable schemes could provide long-term benefits for stakeholders and ecosystems.

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azotobacter N1 and Bacillus B1 strains were isolated from soil and purified.

Taxon: AzotobacterAzotobactere0
Material: strain N1e0
Outcome: isolated from the soil and purifiede0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0
“Two bacteria strains (Azotobacter strain N1, Bacillus strains B1) were isolated from the soil and purified.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–107

Title

Effect of Inoculation Exogenous Microorganisms on Ophiopogon activities

Qiong Fang Li; Zheng Qing Ma; Qi Yan Li; et al. Advanced materials research 2012. doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.610-613.220

Other claims from this paper (4)

Observation Bacillus B1 was isolated from soil and purified.
Intervention effect Exogenous microorganism inoculation significantly increased both enzyme activities and chlorophyll content in Ophiopogon.
Intervention effect The increases in enzyme activities and chlorophyll content were enhanced with addition of microbial biomass.
Intervention effect Mixed bacterial cultures increased enzyme activities and chlorophyll content more than single cultures.

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azotobacter transformants tolerated saline water.

Taxon: AzotobacterAzotobactere0
Outcome: high tolerance against saline watere0

Verbatim

e0
“some transformants of Azotobacter showed high tolerance against saline water (0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1.oo, 1.25, 1.50, 1.75, and 2.00 g/ 100 ml w/v)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 198–341

Title

NEW AZOTOBACTER TRANSFORMANTS TO IMPROVE GROWTH OF SQUASH PLANTS UNDER SALINITY STREESS.

E. Hassan; O. Dakhly Journal of Plant Production 2008. doi:10.21608/jpp.2008.170398

Other claims from this paper (6)

Observation Wild Azotobacter was sensitive to 1.5–2.0% NaCl compared with Bacillus donor.
Intervention effect Two-hour incubation yielded fewer Azotobacter transformants than 24-hour incubation.
Intervention effect Adding Azotobacter transformants reduced salinity symptoms on squash.
Observation Azotobacter transformants differed in effects on squash growth under salinity.
Intervention effect Azotobacter transformant T2 had the best effect on squash growth.
Intervention effect Azotobacter transformant T4 had the best effect on squash growth.

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wild Azotobacter was sensitive to 1.5–2.0% NaCl compared with Bacillus donor.

Taxon: AzotobacterAzotobactere0
Outcome: sensitive to 1.5-2.0% NaCle0
Comparator: Bacillus sppe0

Verbatim

e0
“The wild type strain of Azotobacter was sensitive to 1.5-2.0% NaCl as recipient comparison to the Bacillus spp < /em>.which resistant to 30%NaCl as donor”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–814

Title

NEW AZOTOBACTER TRANSFORMANTS TO IMPROVE GROWTH OF SQUASH PLANTS UNDER SALINITY STREESS.

E. Hassan; O. Dakhly Journal of Plant Production 2008. doi:10.21608/jpp.2008.170398

Other claims from this paper (6)

Observation Azotobacter transformants tolerated saline water.
Intervention effect Two-hour incubation yielded fewer Azotobacter transformants than 24-hour incubation.
Intervention effect Adding Azotobacter transformants reduced salinity symptoms on squash.
Observation Azotobacter transformants differed in effects on squash growth under salinity.
Intervention effect Azotobacter transformant T2 had the best effect on squash growth.
Intervention effect Azotobacter transformant T4 had the best effect on squash growth.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two-hour incubation yielded fewer Azotobacter transformants than 24-hour incubation.

Taxon: AzotobacterAzotobactere0
Treatment: two hours incubatione0
Outcome: frequenciese0
Direction: lesse0
Comparator: 24 hours incubatione0

Verbatim

e0
“The transformants of Azotobacter were obtained after two hours incubation were less in their frequencies than those were obtained after 24 hours incubation with DNA of Bacillus sp.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 819–999

Title

NEW AZOTOBACTER TRANSFORMANTS TO IMPROVE GROWTH OF SQUASH PLANTS UNDER SALINITY STREESS.

E. Hassan; O. Dakhly Journal of Plant Production 2008. doi:10.21608/jpp.2008.170398

Other claims from this paper (6)

Observation Azotobacter transformants tolerated saline water.
Observation Wild Azotobacter was sensitive to 1.5–2.0% NaCl compared with Bacillus donor.
Intervention effect Adding Azotobacter transformants reduced salinity symptoms on squash.
Observation Azotobacter transformants differed in effects on squash growth under salinity.
Intervention effect Azotobacter transformant T2 had the best effect on squash growth.
Intervention effect Azotobacter transformant T4 had the best effect on squash growth.