Paper · 2017 · CINECA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Basilicata)

Effect of different sustainable orchard management strategies on soil properties, nutrient uptake and soil microbiological aspects in an olive orchard

B Elias; Georgios Doupis; Adriano Sofo; et al.

12
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

The short-term (three years) effects of four sustainable orchard management schemes were evaluated in an experimental olive orchard in Crete, Greece, in terms of mineral content of soil and trees, soil microbial populations and mycorrhizal colonization. The study was performed between 2013 and 2015 in a forty-year-old olive plantation (Olea europaea L., cv. Kalamata). The orchard management schemes included: a) compost application (COMP), b) recycling of pruning material (PRUN), c) a mixed (legumes and Avena sativa) cover crop (COVER), d) combination of a, b and c (ALL), and e) control (CON), with no application of organic material and maintenance of weed-free orchard. Although alteration of basic soil properties including increase of organic matter and water and nutrient holding capacity are slow processes that require several years to be achieved, some positive effects were recorded during the first 3 years of application. Soil organic matter, was significantly increased in ALL treatment as compared to single-factor treatments, where differentiation from control was still not clear. Nitrate-N availability was higher in COMP and ALL treatments, while sole application of PRUN treatment seemed to act negatively in N availability as compared to control. Phosphorus availability was also increased in COMP and ALL treatments, while ALL treatment resulted in higher N and P content in olive tree leaves. A positive effect on mycorrhizal colonization was recorded in ALL treatment, while all sustainable schemes seemed to favor the populations of azotobacters and actinomycetes, as compared to the control. The adoption of the sustainable management schemes applied during this study, is in complete agreement with the European policy on the transition from a linear to a circular economy and could provide significant benefits for rural stakeholders and ecosystems in the long term.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

ALL significantly increased soil organic matter relative to single-factor treatments.

Treatment
ALL treatmente0
Outcome
Soil organic mattere0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
single-factor treatmentse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Soil organic matter, was significantly increased in ALL treatment as compared to single-factor treatments, where differentiation from control was still not clear”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 939–1100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil organic matter differentiation between single-factor treatments and control remained unclear.

Treatment
single-factor treatmentse0
Outcome
Soil organic mattere0
Qualifier
still not cleare0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Soil organic matter, was significantly increased in ALL treatment as compared to single-factor treatments, where differentiation from control was still not clear”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 939–1100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

COMP increased nitrate-N availability.

Treatment
COMPe0
Outcome
Nitrate-N availabilitye0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrate-N availability was higher in COMP and ALL treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1162 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ALL increased nitrate-N availability.

Treatment
ALLe0
Outcome
Nitrate-N availabilitye0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrate-N availability was higher in COMP and ALL treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1162 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PRUN alone appeared to negatively affect N availability relative to control.

Treatment
sole application of PRUN treatmente0
Outcome
N availabilitye0
Direction
negativelye0
Qualifier
seemede0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“sole application of PRUN treatment seemed to act negatively in N availability as compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1170–1270 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

COMP increased phosphorus availability.

Treatment
COMPe0
Outcome
Phosphorus availabilitye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Phosphorus availability was also increased in COMP and ALL treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1272–1341 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ALL increased phosphorus availability.

Treatment
ALLe0
Outcome
Phosphorus availabilitye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Phosphorus availability was also increased in COMP and ALL treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1272–1341 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ALL increased N and P content in olive leaves.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
ALL treatmente0
Outcome
N and P contente0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ALL treatment resulted in higher N and P content in olive tree leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1349–1418 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ALL positively affected mycorrhizal colonization in olive.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeat0
Treatment
ALL treatmente0
Outcome
mycorrhizal colonizatione0
Direction
positive effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A positive effect on mycorrhizal colonization was recorded in ALL treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1420–1495 · show in text ↑
t0

“olive”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 137–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All sustainable schemes appeared to favor azotobacter populations relative to control.

Taxon
azotobactersAzotobactere0
Treatment
all sustainable schemese0
Outcome
populations of azotobacterse0
Direction
favore0
Qualifier
seemede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all sustainable schemes seemed to favor the populations of azotobacters and actinomycetes, as compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1503–1620 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All sustainable schemes appeared to favor actinomycete populations relative to control.

Taxon
actinomycetesActinomycetese0
Treatment
all sustainable schemese0
Outcome
populationse0
Direction
favore0
Qualifier
seemede0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“all sustainable schemes seemed to favor the populations of azotobacters and actinomycetes, as compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1503–1620 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that adopting these sustainable schemes could provide long-term benefits for stakeholders and ecosystems.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeat0
Outcome
adoption of the sustainable management schemese0
Qualifier
could provide significant benefits for rural stakeholders and ecosystems in the long terme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The adoption of the sustainable management schemes applied during this study, is in complete agreement with the European policy on the transition from a linear to a circular economy and could provide significant benefits for rural stakeholders and ecosystems in the long term”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1622–1897 · show in text ↑
t0

“olive”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 137–142 · show in text ↑

fertilization · nutrient: content · Olea europaea (common olive)Positive and negative results

35 papers: 28 positive, 7 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.